There are some funny posters here and knowledge is endless with the smart heads put together
Topic: i just thought something about campaign (Read 618 times)
I like this forum to post here even without a campaign but I would not mind to be in one
There are some funny posters here and knowledge is endless with the smart heads put together
There are some funny posters here and knowledge is endless with the smart heads put together
Hopefully one day we will have a system where we can build a reputation for ourselves based on the experience we have and we get paid according to a formula. Think of it like a profile you can "level up" or "rank"
but the ranks are about quality no quantity.
It will be much easier for managers to see regular members then dead beats. Regulars will be around a long time and active and have a decent score since it will naturally be acquired. As things are it is difficult to tell a user who is truly interested then users who are just posting to reach the quota. It will make it much faster since managers just don't have the time to do this. It will also be a more unbias approach.
but the ranks are about quality no quantity.
It will be much easier for managers to see regular members then dead beats. Regulars will be around a long time and active and have a decent score since it will naturally be acquired. As things are it is difficult to tell a user who is truly interested then users who are just posting to reach the quota. It will make it much faster since managers just don't have the time to do this. It will also be a more unbias approach.
Somehow this holds true. If you take a look on Altcoin Discussions, you can see a lot of Heroes or Legends spam all around.
Not all members achieved their rank by 'earning' merits, some acquired them through airdrops when the merit system was newly introduced and it was on the basis of their activity and not the value of their content, and ironically some have not been able to earn even a single merit despite owning legendary/Hero member accounts.
They're already gone on that campaign last week. What if I didn't posted anything concrete or amazing posts? i'm still learning since I'm new here in this forum.
is this a discrimination because im just a newbie so you cant trust my statements? i already told you that check all of the reputable campaigns and the participant's posts so we can have the same thoughts. In all of the replies on this thread you are the only negative, im not posting here just to waste time im here to know something and i already proven it because they have been remove on the campaign.
My previous post has nothing to do with you or your posting abilities. I think you misunderstood it completely. No idea which part of it you think is a discrimination towards you or your rank.is this a discrimination because im just a newbie so you cant trust my statements? i already told you that check all of the reputable campaigns and the participant's posts so we can have the same thoughts. In all of the replies on this thread you are the only negative, im not posting here just to waste time im here to know something and i already proven it because they have been remove on the campaign.
You said that there are members who are bad posters in the campaigns managed by Darkstar and Yahoo without adding any names or proof to back up those claims. Doing so you make it look like two reputable managers don't do their job properly. That is what my reply is based on and not on you, your rank or posting ability.
If you are accusing someone of something there needs to be a proper case against that person for some wrongdoings.
.
He is a very knowledgeable and experienced newbie 
How does a newbie can know who are reputable managers in the forum, after joining it less than two weeks?
One day after joining, made discussion about merit source
judging me through my posts. a fact about me, i can read half of a book less than 3 days. if other people can read then what about me, people here are being judgmental. i spend a lot of time to understand what is the features you got in this forum and that is the merit system, trust and others. there are fellow people who gave me insights on what should i know here before i register my account so don't judge me if im capable of giving statements like that. maybe im just better than some of high ranks so people get insecured and attack me because im a new. im not like the other who join because of $_$
its not new in a forum to have gifted or experience people. are you from different dimension?
im not blind so i'm very confident on what i saw on that campaign. we shouldn't tolerate shit posting here, check it by yourself if you don't believe me.
Check what? You haven't posted anything concrete. All you have done is you have accused two very reputable campaign managers of not doing their job properly because they allow "shit posters" in their campaigns. Can you show a few posts of the "shit posters"? You don't even have to mention names if it makes you uncomfortable, make a screenshot and omit the names. They're already gone on that campaign last week. What if I didn't posted anything concrete or amazing posts? i'm still learning since I'm new here in this forum.
is this a discrimination because im just a newbie so you cant trust my statements? i already told you that check all of the reputable campaigns and the participant's posts so we can have the same thoughts. In all of the replies on this thread you are the only negative, im not posting here just to waste time im here to know something and i already proven it because they have been remove on the campaign.
i said to him to check the participants but he didnt do it. then im the wrong one now.
.
He is a very knowledgeable and experienced newbie How does a newbie can know who are reputable managers in the forum, after joining it less than two weeks?
One day after joining, made discussion about merit source
im not blind so i'm very confident on what i saw on that campaign. we shouldn't tolerate shit posting here, check it by yourself if you don't believe me.
Check what? You haven't posted anything concrete. All you have done is you have accused two very reputable campaign managers of not doing their job properly because they allow "shit posters" in their campaigns. Can you show a few posts of the "shit posters"? You don't even have to mention names if it makes you uncomfortable, make a screenshot and omit the names. They're already gone on that campaign last week. What if I didn't posted anything concrete or amazing posts? i'm still learning since I'm new here in this forum.
is this a discrimination because im just a newbie so you cant trust my statements? i already told you that check all of the reputable campaigns and the participant's posts so we can have the same thoughts. In all of the replies on this thread you are the only negative, im not posting here just to waste time im here to know something and i already proven it because they have been remove on the campaign.
im not blind so i'm very confident on what i saw on that campaign. we shouldn't tolerate shit posting here, check it by yourself if you don't believe me.
Check what? You haven't posted anything concrete. All you have done is you have accused two very reputable campaign managers of not doing their job properly because they allow "shit posters" in their campaigns. Can you show a few posts of the "shit posters"? You don't even have to mention names if it makes you uncomfortable, make a screenshot and omit the names. They're already gone on that campaign last week. What if I didn't posted anything concrete or amazing posts? i'm still learning since I'm new here in this forum.
is this a discrimination because im just a newbie so you cant trust my statements? i already told you that check all of the reputable campaigns and the participant's posts so we can have the same thoughts. In all of the replies on this thread you are the only negative, im not posting here just to waste time im here to know something and i already proven it because they have been remove on the campaign.
Ah well, it's somewhat same everywhere. Some times people enjoy the better benefits because they were there early. Not everything on the internet require exceptional skills so as to enjoy the good outta it.
Moreover, in order to give everyone the chance moving on, the merit system was introduced so currently you may have many posts but you may not rank up if you don't make the necessary merits.
Bottom line: do best what you can do to earn as much as you can and don't lament over other's higher pays. Maybe the had the opportunity to get into crypto before you but tht doesn't limit you from doing well to earn more, and that's why bounties are of various categories and forms.
Moreover, in order to give everyone the chance moving on, the merit system was introduced so currently you may have many posts but you may not rank up if you don't make the necessary merits.
Bottom line: do best what you can do to earn as much as you can and don't lament over other's higher pays. Maybe the had the opportunity to get into crypto before you but tht doesn't limit you from doing well to earn more, and that's why bounties are of various categories and forms.
Campaigns wants you to have a merit or more, no red trust, for you to be able to participate in their bounty. You are good to go as long as you post and wear their signature while posting.
The campaign that i checked was managed by a person that you mentioned and noticed that some participants are not good at posting. Then if they knew that their participants are filled by not good participants, why do they still keep them as a participant of a campaign.
Since you think that some candidates do not meet the criteria set before them, it is your right to report them to theirs campaign managers, and in case of ChipMixer SC you can even expect a reward if your claims prove justified.
If there's someone who's really bad for this feel free to PM me and I'll send you a small bounty if they end up being removed.
Given that ChipMixer is the best paid signature campaign in this forum, it is quite realistic to expect the highest standards which participants must satisfy. I think the recent removal of several participants demonstrate that these standards still maintain high levels.
Check what? You haven't posted anything concrete. All you have done is you have accused two very reputable campaign managers of not doing their job properly because they allow "shit posters" in their campaigns. Can you show a few posts of the "shit posters"? You don't even have to mention names if it makes you uncomfortable, make a screenshot and omit the names.
He is a very knowledgeable and experienced newbie How does a newbie can know who are reputable managers in the forum, after joining it less than two weeks?
One day after joining, made discussion about merit source
im not blind so i'm very confident on what i saw on that campaign. we shouldn't tolerate shit posting here, check it by yourself if you don't believe me.
Check what? You haven't posted anything concrete. All you have done is you have accused two very reputable campaign managers of not doing their job properly because they allow "shit posters" in their campaigns. Can you show a few posts of the "shit posters"? You don't even have to mention names if it makes you uncomfortable, make a screenshot and omit the names. I've noticed that earning here was one of the major goal of other people that registered in here. I don't know any issue about earning here so I can say that it's very beneficial.
so, is earning also your reason joining this forum? or you just accidentally found this forum when looking information about bitcoin?
based on my posts and how concern i am on this issue, what do you think?
obviously i don't have specific idea how they earn here so definitely i didn't joined because of bitcoin.
I check a campaign and the participants, i noticed that some aren't good at posting and still earning btc. I concluded that ranks doesn't define your ideas because when it comes to campaign it is just define the amount of your payment and still lacks ideas on posting. any thoughts?
it's a harsh way of judging other people abilities and campaign as a whole some of us are coming from non-native English speaking countries, and not even ESL (English as Second Language)
so we have some difficulties with grammar and articulation of words in expressing our thoughts
im not blind so i'm very confident on what i saw on that campaign. we shouldn't tolerate shit posting here, check it by yourself if you don't believe me.
grammar can be considerable and i know that, im a past mod and i'm considering those statements especially when it comes to ideas but the things that i've saw was completely shit post, obviously shit post.
Every campaign have different campaign managers and different goals for the company that they represent. The main goal of these campaigns are to provide exposure for the company to a wide audience. People posting constructive content will get a lot more views and that is what these companies wants.
The campaign managers will look for posters that can provide unique content and also something that would stimulate traffic to their threads and their posts. So, if you provide quality content, you would be rewarded with a good campaign and some decent income for your time and effort that you put in to provide that content.
i already know. read again the op.The campaign managers will look for posters that can provide unique content and also something that would stimulate traffic to their threads and their posts. So, if you provide quality content, you would be rewarded with a good campaign and some decent income for your time and effort that you put in to provide that content.
i'm referring those who don't meet the standards needed for being a quality poster but still earning money.
Every campaign have different campaign managers and different goals for the company that they represent. The main goal of these campaigns are to provide exposure for the company to a wide audience. People posting constructive content will get a lot more views and that is what these companies wants.
The campaign managers will look for posters that can provide unique content and also something that would stimulate traffic to their threads and their posts. So, if you provide quality content, you would be rewarded with a good campaign and some decent income for your time and effort that you put in to provide that content.
The campaign managers will look for posters that can provide unique content and also something that would stimulate traffic to their threads and their posts. So, if you provide quality content, you would be rewarded with a good campaign and some decent income for your time and effort that you put in to provide that content.
What is and isn't a good poster is completely subjective, but examples of what the op thinks are bad posters would be helpful, especially in regards to the Chipmixer campaign. Can't comment on Yahoo's as I don't know what campaigns he's running but Darkstar's accepted candidates are usually among the best posters. If op wants to make a case for a poorly run campaign then he should probably expand upon the users he has in mind, otherwise this thread will go nowhere.
In ChipMixer campaign, there is a rule that there is no minimum number of posts. Additionally, participants won't be removed if don't post in continuous weeks. At least, there is no rule about that. Months ago, DS removed dozens of participants (maybe due to inactive posting for too long). With such rule, no minimum posts required per week, and from high-quality posters at starts, I don't think anyone in ChipMixer campaign actually spam post to hit post quota each week (50). There are very less probabilities to see participants removed from that campaign, hence very rare open slots over months.
Snip
I wanted to hear how the OP thinks and based on what he is making those claims. He mentioned that those 'bad posters' are from one of the campaigns managed by Yahoo62278 or DarkStar_. Highly unlikely that some of the most knowledgeable and active users in the technical sections of this forum don't now how to post. But lets wait for some feedback by the OP. What is and isn't a good poster is completely subjective, but examples of what the op thinks are bad posters would be helpful, especially in regards to the Chipmixer campaign. Can't comment on Yahoo's as I don't know what campaigns he's running but Darkstar's accepted candidates are usually among the best posters. If op wants to make a case for a poorly run campaign then he should probably expand upon the users he has in mind, otherwise this thread will go nowhere.
Snip
I wanted to hear how the OP thinks and based on what he is making those claims. He mentioned that those 'bad posters' are from one of the campaigns managed by Yahoo62278 or DarkStar_. Highly unlikely that some of the most knowledgeable and active users in the technical sections of this forum don't now how to post. But lets wait for some feedback by the OP. When you say that you found members from a Bitcoin campaign that are not good posters can you explain what exactly is wrong with their posts?
They don't do those things, but they actually take all slots of good campaigns, and old-era members (from Member to Legendary ranks) who are shit-posting users are unable to compete with them for those slots.Failed applicants think that they habitually make good posts, and deserve slots in good campaigns, as accepted applicants; but in fact they don't deserve those slots.
Quote
Are they giving wrong advice?
Are they not good because they make grammatical or others structural errors in their posts?
Do they spam and create meaningless posts?
They can blame on managers: I failed to apply in campaign of project A, because manager A is a shit one; then blame to manager B, and so on. I do think if they failed to apply in a bunches of good campaigns, it is enough to go to a conclusion that those users failed because their intrinsic values are low, much lower than other applicants - whom successful applied and got slots. That's all. Are they not good because they make grammatical or others structural errors in their posts?
Do they spam and create meaningless posts?
fix your quotation.
I think he is saying that there is an airdrop component in the merits gained by some senior members when they increased rank. I was a Hero when the system was introduced, so I received 500 merits, and thus, I only needed an additional 500 "earned" merit to gain Legendary status.
and regarding that statement, I already knew that.
That's what I also said in here;
No one ranked up through airdropped merits because they already received the respective merits equivalent to their rank. For example, if you're a full member before the merit system implementation, you'll receive 100 airdropped merits. So it means if they achieved the rank, it's through earning merits since the introduction of the merit system. I'm one of those people who are close to being a Sr. Member and the merit system serve as the barricade for me to rank up.
He's saying that some members get ranked up after receiving the airdropped merits so I'm trying to debunk it. 
fix your quotation.
I think he is saying that there is an airdrop component in the merits gained by some senior members when they increased rank. I was a Hero when the system was introduced, so I received 500 merits, and thus, I only needed an additional 500 "earned" merit to gain Legendary status.
Jump to: