Topic: I may be wrong, thinking about the gov intervention - page 2. (Read 528 times)
LOL, the conspiracy theories! Dude, this is what people call correction. All the cryptos were just rising way too fast in Q1 in terms of prices. And now most of the projects haven't been able to deliver. Scams, SEC regulations and maybe people cashing out for year end festivities could be some reasons due to this drop. But thing is no investment can always go in upward direction. It's always ups and downs. I'm sure with more adoption and entry of institutional investors things will get better. But please don't blame it on secret agents!
I think that this is not the case, because the governments do not have the privileges of managing the global financial system, but bankers can influence the cryptocurrency market, this effect we observe today.
I don't think any government will go that extent to destroy an idea that has come to stay. Goverment can not do that and even an individual or corporate establishment cannot also do it. I to let you remember that this is decentralised network and no one can kill it off, it is just a matter of time when the who world will accept the concept of decentralized currency.
I'm not sure, but in such a market condition, who else does agree that the government used a hidden identity and joined the crypto market to accumulate a large number of bitcoins, then sold it to affect its price? Or can the gov hires a couple well known personality to rule the every day news and kill it slowly?
What's the point in guessing? Let's put to rest all this stuff about conspiracies and focus on what really will help us: learning charts and reducing risks. We must have a good plan of action for each outcome
Waiting for Bitcoin 1k
The only way that the government will intervene with the crypto is thru legalization and regulation of all the transaction and activities of crypto. Securing investor's money by empowering SEC in crypto will harmonize the growth of crypto and develop more investor's confidence rating.Other countries had already intervened by their government regarding about crypto to freely introduce to the public and builds securities of their investments. The main concern about the government is about tax and to protect people's money.
many option are open for such situation, but which government get the impact from the growth of bitcoin even i think many country and government are get the positive impact from cryptocurrencies, i think it was not a government yet it was just a market cycle.
What is happening now may be another manipulation. And it can come from both major Bitcoin holders, and from governments as you suggested. No one knows for sure. The main thing is to be able to get a benefit from the current situation.
I'm not sure, but in such a market condition, who else does agree that the government used a hidden identity and joined the crypto market to accumulate a large number of bitcoins, then sold it to affect its price? Or can the gov hires a couple well known personality to rule the every day news and kill it slowly?
The government can do a lot. Perhaps the big cryptocurrency capital belongs to different countries. We will not know. And the information war is always seen. Even developers see the information war to get more investment in their project.
I'm not sure, but in such a market condition, who else does agree that the government used a hidden identity and joined the crypto market to accumulate a large number of bitcoins, then sold it to affect its price? Or can the gov hires a couple well known personality to rule the every day news and kill it slowly?
An interesting assumption on your part. But I do not understand what kind of government you are talking about. Each country treats cryptocurrencies differently, and if one of them does not want to legalize cryptocurrency, they do not need to hire someone or bring down the market, the government can do it directly.
When is growth?
I'm not sure, but in such a market condition, who else does agree that the government used a hidden identity and joined the crypto market to accumulate a large number of bitcoins, then sold it to affect its price? Or can the gov hires a couple well known personality to rule the every day news and kill it slowly?
The government that is out there to protect the interest of investors will not do such a thing at our detriment, of which they know if they venture into such, it will also affect them. I think there some people out there aside the government, doing everything possible to ensure that prices are brought allow. I won't be surprised to think they are doing it for their selfish interest, by peddling fake news around.
Encryption is a high-risk investment. I don't think the government will invest. They will try to influence the encryption market.
The government will not choose this way. This is the wrong way the government will lose money. The best way for the government is to issue its own cryptocurrency, which will cause the coins other than Bitcoin to depreciate or even disappear. This is a very likely event in the future.
They don't need to do this at all, because the government needs to invest a lot of money, they still have to bear huge losses to get the job done. If the government really wants to encrypt death, then they only need to ban all transactions and issue relevant laws to achieve!
Quite possible, but most likely I think it involved not the government, and banks because they cannot afford to lose customers in the financial market!
At the moment, no one knows anything, I think that someone is playing his game, but who exactly is not yet known, but let's hope that these players have just bought themselves and will wait for the moment to sell it all and now will affect the price with the best parties and make the market turn into bullish
I'm not sure, but in such a market condition, who else does agree that the government used a hidden identity and joined the crypto market to accumulate a large number of bitcoins, then sold it to affect its price? Or can the gov hires a couple well known personality to rule the every day news and kill it slowly?
I do not think that governments will use such methods to discredit the idea of cryptocurrency. Governments have many direct and more effective methods of dealing with cryptocurrency if they want to do this. They can directly prohibit the circulation of cryptocurrencies under various plausible excuses. I'm not sure, but in such a market condition, who else does agree that the government used a hidden identity and joined the crypto market to accumulate a large number of bitcoins, then sold it to affect its price? Or can the gov hires a couple well known personality to rule the every day news and kill it slowly?
this can happen, but in my opinion, this kind of thing is more than the actions of individuals. manipulation and various things that cause crypto to experience a tremendous decline like this. Unfortunately they continue to use the same pattern to attract new investors. then if you see bitcoin has a good price, they start selling it again.
It can be. But we will never know for sure what reason the fall is. But I believe that this is hardly possible. Governments can't control the price of crypto the way they want to.
Jump to: