Topic: I require community feedback (Thanks) - page 2. (Read 525 times)

Why is that some people are not serious in a work that pays them, what happens to his hand to type letters with his own idea's,  tell what should warrant people to use IA, from what I noticed is like this people have different account and they use IA to make sure they have meet up with the number's of post they needed weekly, if I'm the person in control of the sector it promote I will take my decision by removing the person without notice since it doesn't want to take its engagement serious

Well not being able to participate til January 2023 isn't a big deal since that was 6 months ago lol. Your campaign your rules man, your job isn't to please the community with whatever standards you think they want to see, just run the campaign however you feel it need ran. If people don't like it, fuck em they don't have to join. They can try to get a project or 2 and manage in the way they feel.

I have passed a detector and I see that I get some posts as humanly generated at 100% and others as AI generated at 90% or so. The problem is that I do not see much difference between one and the other, as they are generic posts in general, most of them in Gambling or Bitcoin Discussion.

The problem with AI is that it will be increasingly difficult to distinguish what is written by AI from what is written by humans, we are still in early stages.

 

I checked a couple of his post on two platforms and they all passed with flying colours. Posting the screenshot of the first post that seems to be written by an AI. Detecting AI content is not that easy. Sometime you can easily detect them by reading the content and sometime you need to use detection platform. Those two I used are considered good.

Another thing as per my understanding if some is using AI then they would use it to create topics and not for replying to a topic. The user in question is replying in this instance.

Using AI is not yet moderated by the staff. Could it be considered plagiarism if they post those content genereated by AI?  Or who knows he is as good as how AI thinks thats why its more than 90%. But 100%?

It is not good to posts them though since basically, its not him who created the context. I guess a wiggle room for it will work like if the AI Detector only sees less than 50%, then he must have contributed.

I also tried to copy some of my latest posts on the website that anonymous reporter has shared (thanks for sharing anyway), and most of them are less than 1% fake (some are even 0%), but there are 2 of my posts that has more than 30%. I also don't know if this AI detector is reliable or not as well.

Anyway, I don't know if it's only me, but I despise users who are using ChatGPT for their advantage here in the forum just to get a few bucks in their signature campaign. IMO, it's obvious that the OP has used AI apps to maximize the quality of his posts. I just don't know why people are using it here? To gain merits? Self-validation? To show here that you are a good poster? I mean it doesn't make sense (for me).

We've seen previous report from a user who has been caught using AI tools in his posts, but what he only got is a neutral trust, and a ban from campaigns that Royse777 is managing, and will be managing in the future. Deleting his AI posts will be useless as well because he has been exposed already, and I guess it's almost certain that he will be out of Yomix anytime soon (if proven he's using AI).

P.S. Well, I guess that the site that the reporter has posted isn't as reliable as it is because @pakhitheboss tried it on another AI detector, and it seems that it says there that it wasn't an AI written post.
I tried using the AI detector website that @nutildah has shared here: LINK
LINK LINK LINK LINK
On the first post that is suspected to be AI written, 2 of the sites said that it is created by a human, while the 2 said that it has made thru AI.
On the second post that is suspected to be AI written, 4 of the same websites that I used said that it is created by human.
On the third post that is suspected to be AI written, 2 of the sites again said that it is created by a human while the 2 said that it has made thru AI.

TBH, it's hard to detect which posts are created by human, and which are created by AI knowing that these AI detector tools have different outputs for the same posts. The only time that we will know that the suspected user is using AI is when he, himself says it. If the accused is using or not, I still despise using AI to earn here.

Accidentally you exposed the reporter. You removed his name, but it forwards to his Bitcointalk profile when someone clicks on the quote link. You may want to remove his UID as well.

About this matter. This is a shitty thing people do. I guess he did it to reach the maximum post limit to get weekly from the campaign. I have seen he received the bonus multiple times. It's not easy for someone to write over 90+ posts each week. Maybe he decided to get help from AI. I suggest he delete all his AI posts before moderators punish him.

Edit: I've Checked some of his posts as well. It doesn't seem AI-Generated. Some AI Detector tools giving false information, I guess?

I don't think you need community feedback about this matter. You already mentioned this in your campaign thread;

I think if you can find direct evidence of using chat GPT or any other AI application I agree people should be banned from the campaign. Obviously many people are in this for the Bitcoin/sats, but honestly I don't count myself among them as I don't go out of my way to make posts for money. I look at a lot of people in campaigns and it seems all they do all day long is shitpost to get as much BTC as possible. If I started doing that for example it would be pretty obvious. Just saying how I personally feel of course.

As you can see the reporter don't want his profile to be in public so respecting that I am posting it on behalf of him. I have done some of my investigations but it seems fighting against AI is not as easy as it was for plagiarism.

@Bitcoin_people, if the result comes negative from majority opinions then please accept my apology in advance but if you found guilty then you will be banned participating from any of my campaigns until 2nd January 2023 2024.

Thanks to you all in advance.

I would like you know your feedback.