Pages:
Author

Topic: I think this needs its own thread: Controlled Demolition Vs. 9/11 - page 3. (Read 3081 times)

sr. member
Activity: 476
Merit: 250
Wait!  Things fall at the same rate due to Earth's gravity??!?

That's the point. For WTC 7 to have symmetrically collapsed at near free-fall, all of the supports of the building had to have failed at the same time. It's a statistically improbable event.
sr. member
Activity: 285
Merit: 250
Turning money into heat since 2011.
Wait!  Things fall at the same rate due to Earth's gravity??!?
You've uncovered a major part of the grand conspiracy.  Newton did it!

Gravity- its an inside job!  Tongue
hero member
Activity: 532
Merit: 500
FIAT LIBERTAS RVAT CAELVM
I have a quick question on this subject someone may be able to answer:

Do planning regulations for skyscrapers and similar structures require the submission or integration of demolition methods for when the building reaches the end of its designed life expectancy?

No, but there are demolition companies who can easily plan these things working only from plans, and then set it up pretty quickly, usually 2-3 days for a controlled implosion.

There's no "self-destruct" button, if that's what you're asking.
hero member
Activity: 926
Merit: 1001
weaving spiders come not here
jr. member
Activity: 56
Merit: 1
Pages:
Jump to: