Topic: I want to make a group against foolish, poor knowledge campaign manager,join it. (Read 2066 times)

Instead of getting butthurt from being denied from those campaign why don't you make it as an inspiration to do more better job, and also if a campaign manager denie's that really means that your post quality is bad and needs to improve, and you better closed this thread mate so you will not create more confusion and so campaign managers will not mark you as banned member in their campaigns

Yes. Good hints. lakisis(OP) typed a space between a word and comma, such as: "beat him badly ," and "this forum ,".

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.16172824

So does BitDiscussion, such as:"group ," and "campaign ,".

Mod you have very strong observation. And SFR10 and yahoo are due diligent to check post quality, they are good managers

i told in the first if someone do not want complaint from high rank account you complaint from other newbie account. i think people are worry about his high rank account because they are all post from newbie account its solid proof.

Yeah right, shill account.   

OP, how many suckers do you have in your little butthurt brigade?   I'm going to guess there's you and...you. 

Give it up.

Ignore.

there is a Manager SFR10 is very foolish and nonsense SFR10 have no knowledge that how to mange a campaign i want to say like other members he just need novel writer for his campaign and they people are also foolish and nonsense who hire SFR10 for manage the campaign and you can check the future of SAFEDICE is going to finish.

I sense a butthurt sig campaign reject.

Why don't you tell us, who this "foolish" campaign manager is? Is there really was a problem with them, we would all agree. But we aren't. I'm sure if you asked the campaign manager why you got kicked. They would say that you have a shitty post quality. Simple.

There is no right way to manage a signature campaign, as they aren't regulated. To think otherwise is very stupid.

It varies every campaign, and depends on the manager. Spam campaigns like YoBit and secondstrade won't care about past post history. Generally, they look for members with a good post quality though.

Again, there is no right way to maintain a spreadsheet. Does the manager of the campaign not manage it the "right?" way? Join a different campaign.

If you were the owner of a restaurant and needed to hire cooks, would you rather hire one that has good experience already, or would you hire one that might not cook very well, or has no experience? Would you be even willing to risk hiring a really bad cook? Probably not.

Because those threads are basically people echoing each other, and has no value. Some sections aren't included since they probably aren't good for advertising, or have spam. Would a fully english dice site want to advertise in the French section? No. If you ran a restaurant business, you would want to advertise to people who eat at restaurants, not people who insist on cooking everyting at home. Again, if you don't like the terms, don't join.

---

There are many campaigns to chose from. If you don't like a campaign manager or how it is managed, simply don't join the campaign. Most people that complain are probably those rejected from good campaigns because they have bad post quality.

Wow. Good example by having excellent observation.

I want to add to what others have said, have you even tried to manage a campaign before? then you will also understand that they are doing a great job by putting their names and reputation on the line. BUt if you have grudge against anyone I suggest you take it up with him and not generalise... My humble opinion...

Unfortunately there are very few signature campaigns that are run by a bot like Yobit, Bitmixer and now deceased (yeah a bad term but I like to use it) Coinsbank signature. These signature have of course managers that they watch the users, I am specifically talking about Yobit here run by Hilarious and co which he removes non english speakers, one liners and spammers. A great job in my view. However he didn't do the selection as the process was automatic, every user was accepted and if he was good he continued, if he did one of the three things named above he would get removed real quick from Hilariousandco the manager of the campaign. This is how a good manager must behave, give a chance to every one on trail and without any mercy to remove those who are not fit. This is not personal, its just business, if you can promote the brand well they will keep you, if you do more harm then good then they will ban or kick you out of the campaign.

No,it's not.From the people I had known over years,no campaign manager is actually dependent on the signature management earnings.They do it because they can.No one finds pleasure in sitting front of the computer for 8 hours reading the series of opinions (and shit posts).

well OP didn't mentioned the manage's names in this thread but in his previous posts. I saw he have problems with Yahoo and SFR10.
I think his account got rejected from their campaign because of low quality posts. now he want to ruin their reputation. but he may don't know these guys gain that trust after hard work of years.. it can;t be  vanished in 1 day. and without any valid reason

Judging by your actions(spamming at sig campaigns threads,using alts,opening threads in the wrong section) i can say that whoever rejected you took the right decision,it's funny to see that your lame attempt to ruin other's reputation has backfired,well played.

another novel writer

Well i think you are out of your mind posting this shit here. Campaign Managers here are doing great job and are respected by all the Members of this Forum. They have done hard work and due to this reason ,every new campaign wish to hire them and not try for a new campaign manager.

I do not agree with OP. To manage a campaign is a full time job which require that you select people on merit. The better you filter applicants based on their posts, the better the job is fulfilled as Campaign manager.

1. yes op has the right to express his feelings but he is wrong. attacking  someone without proper reason is wrong, although op didnot mention the manager's name specifically.
2. if you know some managers who are not doing their work properly then you should mention their name also. lol. let us also know  who is that manager. btw, i think that you were also kicked out  from a campaign by some manager  in the past, so you are posting like this. anyway, you are free to prove me wrong.

I believe he is right and everyone has his right to say or express his feelings . I also agree with him as there are some campaign managers not doing their job properly and can not figure out why do they mismanage things . However the OP made me smile when I read this . I think building a group is not going to help us out , however someone had to take an initiative and I appreciate this .

I have also seen that one of the users was complaining that one of the campaign manager rejected him for not posting in a gap and timing , what does he mean that the users of this forum should give full time to this forum and post in every hour so that they should not be doing their daily life work,

Checking the quality of the post is ok, but rejecting for not posting in a gap - i dont understand this point is valid or not.

This is a welcome development, i agree with you 100%