I was blackmailed | Bitcointalksearch.org

coinlocket$

legendary

Activity: 2534

Merit: 1517

#1 VIP Crypto Casino

Quote from: S_Therapist on January 14, 2019, 05:18:46 AM

For being a DT member, you don't need to have a trusted feedback.
Feedback and DT are two speperate things. This may help you better understand the process- https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.49176783

As said, trust and feedbacks are 2 different things.
One the previous DT network we got a DT2 with red trust, ref https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/is-the-default-trust-system-still-workingactive-5080581

Also, my feedback on jeremypwr is neutral (not positive so his rep value will be the same) and suite the campaign where I am, Is a highlight for who join his signature expecting a regular weekly payment, without delay.

The Cryptovator

legendary

Activity: 2408

Merit: 2226

Signature space for rent

Quote from: bitmover on January 14, 2019, 05:12:57 AM

Hello, thanks for your explanation, but I still didn't get it.

Coinlocket has no trusted feedback. How did qwt added him? I thought a user needed a positive feedback to be added to DT

There is no need any criteria or feedback to become DT2. Any DT member could add you on his trusted list and you will become DT2.

For example if I am on DT1, I can add you on DT2. It's simple.

To become DT1,
You need to be active and make your custom trust list with minimum 10 people's.
Then 10 peoples should add you on their custom trust list who have earned 10 merit.
Finally 2 peopels should add you on thier trust list who have earned 250 merit.
Then you will become DT1.

Hope you got the point.

S_Therapist

sr. member

Activity: 308

Merit: 280

Quote from: bitmover on January 14, 2019, 05:12:57 AM

Quote from: S_Therapist on January 14, 2019, 05:04:21 AM

Coinlocket$ is now in DT2 added by DT1 member qwk.
Also you have misunderstood the trust system.
check this one- https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.48081277

Hello, thanks for your explanation, but I still didn't get it.

Coinlocket has no trusted feedback. How did qwt added him? I thought a user needed a positive feedback to be added to DT

For being a DT member, you don't need to have a trusted feedback.
Feedback and DT are two speperate things. This may help you better understand the process- https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.49176783

bitmover

legendary

Activity: 2352

Merit: 6089

bitcoindata.science

Quote from: S_Therapist on January 14, 2019, 05:04:21 AM

Coinlocket$ is now in DT2 added by DT1 member qwk.
Also you have misunderstood the trust system.
check this one- https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.48081277

Hello, thanks for your explanation, but I still didn't get it.

Coinlocket has no trusted feedback. How did qwt added him? I thought a user needed a positive feedback to be added to DT

S_Therapist

sr. member

Activity: 308

Merit: 280

Quote from: bitmover on January 14, 2019, 04:43:50 AM

Hello people, I have a question about trust. It's a bit off topic, but is related to the case.

When I see Jeremy profile I can see coinlocket$ feedback in my trusted network. However he doesn't have any feedback from dt. Is it because he has more than 100 earned merit?

Does this mean that anyone with 100+ merit can now tag people?I mean, in the default trust network.

Coinlocket$ is now in DT2 added by DT1 member qwk.
Also you have misunderstood the trust system.
check this one- https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.48081277

bitmover

legendary

Activity: 2352

Merit: 6089

bitcoindata.science

Hello people, I have a question about trust. It's a bit off topic, but is related to the case.

When I see Jeremy profile I can see coinlocket$ feedback in my trusted network. However he doesn't have any feedback from dt. Is it because he has more than 100 earned merit?

Does this mean that anyone with 100+ merit can now tag people?I mean, in the default trust network.

Edit:

Quote from: jeremypwr on January 13, 2019, 11:59:58 PM

Thank you for those kind words; you've been a helpful and consistent participant from the very beginning as well.

As my PM mentioned, I probably overreacted a bit and impulsively removed you from the campaign.

It was somewhat childish, I will admit; and have already added you back for this week.

If anyone receives any PMs demanding money, don't pay and report/block.

Come-on guys. Putting he back in the campaign doesn't change anything.
Certain things cannot be undone.

He just kicked a guy for childish reasons, received a red tag and is now suddenly"seeing the light".

jeremypwr

legendary

Activity: 2828

Merit: 4370

🤑 Free Bets have been credited 🤑

Quote from: bbc.reporter on January 13, 2019, 07:48:37 PM

@everyone. This thread is not about jeremypwr. This is about the blackmailer who might be an alt account of someone else in the forum and who might also blackmail you.

jeremypwr is one of the best campaign managers in the forum. This does not change that and I do not take my removal personally or any of my future removals by any other campaign managers personally. It was only a signature campaign.

Thank you for those kind words; you've been a helpful and consistent participant from the very beginning as well.

As my PM mentioned, I probably overreacted a bit and impulsively removed you from the campaign.

It was somewhat childish, I will admit; and have already added you back for this week.

If anyone receives any PMs demanding money, don't pay and report/block.

bones261

legendary

Activity: 1806

Merit: 1828

Quote from: bbc.reporter on January 13, 2019, 07:48:37 PM

@everyone. This thread is not about jeremypwr. This is about the blackmailer who might be an alt account of someone else in the forum and who might also blackmail you.

jeremypwr is one of the best campaign managers in the forum. This does not change that and I do not take my removal personally or any of my future removals by any other campaign managers personally. It was only a signature campaign.

I only tagged the perpetrator of the extortion. It's jeremypwr prerogative to not want to work with someone who he feels slighted by.

marlboroza

legendary

Activity: 1932

Merit: 2272

I still don't see what you did wrong. As I can see, jeremypwr responded to that post https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.33584411 accepted you and then kicked you later because of it? Doesn't make any sense.

Anyway, don't pay these criminals money, once you pay them they will keep coming for more and more until you won't have enough money to pay them and then they will tell what you did(or didn't do) anyway. Report PM to moderator.

gentlemand

legendary

Activity: 2590

Merit: 3015

Welt Am Draht

Quote from: bbc.reporter on January 13, 2019, 07:48:37 PM

@everyone. This thread is not about jeremypwr. This is about the blackmailer who might be an alt account of someone else in the forum and who might also blackmail you.

jeremypwr is one of the best campaign managers in the forum. This does not change that and I do not take my removal personally or any of my future removals by any other campaign managers personally. It was only a signature campaign.

Well, it's pretty comical watching people descend on the Chipmixer thread as soon as there's a sniff of space so I can imagine this type of behaviour will become increasingly prevalent. There seem to be more decent looking campaigns than there've been for a while but still not enough space. Are you keeping an eye on who applies for your space?

I don't think there's any way of telling who it was.

bbc.reporter

legendary

Activity: 3122

Merit: 1492

@everyone. This thread is not about jeremypwr. This is about the blackmailer who might be an alt account of someone else in the forum and who might also blackmail you.

jeremypwr is one of the best campaign managers in the forum. This does not change that and I do not take my removal personally or any of my future removals by any other campaign managers personally. It was only a signature campaign.

vlom

legendary

Activity: 1498

Merit: 1117

jeremypwr muss feel so powerfull now. he has the power who is in the camp and he has the power to remove somebody because of the post linked in the OP. what an idiot.

Hivalley

member

Activity: 210

Merit: 19

Jeremypwr could actually be a baby after all,the more reason why the troll got to him and pissed the hell owta him months after it was made,and also considering he was aware when it was made.
I guess be was planning an epic sack letter for you from the campaign,well orchestrated I must say.
Definitely he owns the both accounts,no one would believe you'll be kicked out from the campaign if they report that.

cizatext

member

Activity: 952

Merit: 41

With what you posted I think you have not committed any offence that will warrant your remover from the sportbet campaign and to even said you informed the manager earlier about someone trying to blackmail you and he advising you not to pay, this alone is enough to justify you personal comment on the manager person calling him a baby long ago.

Kopyleft

member

Activity: 168

Merit: 15

Future of Security Tokens

That's quite a heavy punishment for a slight offense (if that can be called an offense). And the bounty manager already saw it when the incident happened, so it was hardly a secret, except time increases the gravity of an offense.

There may be a lot to this yet to be discovered, and I agree that it fits better in the reputation board.

bitmover

legendary

Activity: 2352

Merit: 6089

bitcoindata.science

Quote from: S_Therapist on January 12, 2019, 09:26:51 PM

Yeah but jeremypwr should not remove you. It's not professionalism. It's nothing to remove someone from a campaign. I agree with what suchmoon said.

Quote from: The Sceptical Chymist on January 13, 2019, 05:10:51 AM

I'm hoping jeremypwr will stop by and explain himself, perhaps providing some PM quotes from the blackmailer or at least an explanation for OP's removal.

Looks like he confirmed OP's accusation lol

By the way, shouldn't this kind of drama be in the reputation session? Meta is already filled with Lauda trust threads...

The Sceptical Chymist

legendary

Activity: 3528

Merit: 7005

Top Crypto Casino

Big LOL at Lauda on a rampage.

This is indeed a bizarre situation--there's no way in hell I'd ever pay anyone blackmail money like that. I'd assume they were either bluffing or that the campaign manager would not act on the information, especially if it was something as silly as that post. But jeremypwr did.

I'm hoping jeremypwr will stop by and explain himself, perhaps providing some PM quotes from the blackmailer or at least an explanation for OP's removal.

LoyceV

legendary

Activity: 3290

Merit: 16489

Thick-Skinned Gang Leader and Golden Feather 2021

Quote from: TryNinja on January 12, 2019, 09:11:35 PM

So, you got removed from the campaign just because you called the manager "a little child" more than 10 months ago? Damn, that's what I call a top-notch manager.

That proves the "little child" reference was quite accurate.

Quote

Edit: Yo DarkStar, why did you merit me? You little baby Angry

You can expect a PM from Lordbrown a few months from now.

rhomelmabini

hero member

Activity: 2030

Merit: 578

No God or Kings, only BITCOIN.

That action of jeremypwr is a child act and I guess that's self explanatory to say. Moreover, it proves his trust rating as a failed bounty manager.

suchmoon

legendary

Activity: 3654

Merit: 8909

https://bpip.org

Quote from: vit05 on January 12, 2019, 10:57:05 PM

I do not believe it was jeremypwr. He has already removed or changed users without giving any great explanation. He does not need to create a great reason to remove someone... unfortunately.

Having had some contentious interactions with jeremypwr I'd say that's exactly his style. He doesn't need a reason but having a manufactured one would make him (in his mind) more righteous. Anyway, that's just my speculation. It's a bizarre story regardless of how you look at it.

Topic: I was blackmailed (Read 1133 times)