Author

Topic: i will reward 18 Merit for quality article for this forum topic is: (Read 243 times)

full member
Activity: 336
Merit: 203


this post i wanted to reward is constructive for the forum and the world, and my project



See? That`s the only problem. You want it also for your project, and you are willing to give merits in reward. Notice many platforms offer payments in exchange of generating blogs contents. That`s why it sounds tricky.
sr. member
Activity: 1470
Merit: 325
you guys really confuse me,

What is so confusing in that? Merit is a system made with the only purpose to clean the forum and make it more constructive for people coming here to know about Bitcoin or other cryptocurrencies. It is not an asset or something that has to be used to reward people for doing things asked for beside being constructive for the forum. So the way you are giving them away, to someone who would write an article and post it here and somewhere else too, is not the right way, but the right way is when you see an article or a post already posted here and you find it helpful for you or for the community, you Merit it away.

weather someone rewards merit passively for content he likes or actively for content he desires is no difference.

How are those not different? By the way, you exchanged the wordings in your statement. They should be like "rewards merit passively for content he desires or actively for content he likes" and that shows the difference between them. You are not supposed to reward Merits passively for content that you ask for, but Merits are to be given to the content that you like when you are surfing the forum.

whats the difference between spending/rewarding merit actively or passively?

I've already answered this above.

you can also improve the quality of the forum by spending your merit for certain good topics
sr. member
Activity: 1204
Merit: 290
you guys really confuse me,

What is so confusing in that? Merit is a system made with the only purpose to clean the forum and make it more constructive for people coming here to know about Bitcoin or other cryptocurrencies. It is not an asset or something that has to be used to reward people for doing things asked for beside being constructive for the forum. So the way you are giving them away, to someone who would write an article and post it here and somewhere else too, is not the right way, but the right way is when you see an article or a post already posted here and you find it helpful for you or for the community, you Merit it away.

weather someone rewards merit passively for content he likes or actively for content he desires is no difference.

How are those not different? By the way, you exchanged the wordings in your statement. They should be like "rewards merit passively for content he desires or actively for content he likes" and that shows the difference between them. You are not supposed to reward Merits passively for content that you ask for, but Merits are to be given to the content that you like when you are surfing the forum.

whats the difference between spending/rewarding merit actively or passively?

I've already answered this above.
sr. member
Activity: 1470
Merit: 325
if i could get a good article on a topic that i consider important while others dont, for various reasons (agenda, invested)

There is no restrictions on asking to get an article on any topic, but the thing you offer in exchange is what's the reason of concern here. You could simply post this in Services section asking for the same thing but offering some currency as reward for that like Bitcoins or any other cryptocurrency (It would have been in Altcoins section if it were to be paid in something beside Bitcoin though), but you offer to reward the person with Merits for this which is what no one should do because it is considered trading Merits as you are giving them away in exchange of something.

i then can still improve the quality of this forum, and i was told thats how i am supposed to use merit for and here i try.

why this outcry now?



This is not a good and effective way of using Merits. You are using them for your own good but not for the betterment of the forum or for qualitative contributions towards the forum. Merits are well used if they are given away to the posts that are constructive for the forum, not if they are given away in exchange of something.

this post i wanted to reward is constructive for the forum and the world, and my project i wanted to sacrifice  Cry Cry Cry all my merit for a good content article i wished for the forum. so someone that wants it can earn it. while others are giving away their merit in lottery and gambling garbage.

its both at the same time, good for me and good for the forum, thats actually how each user in the end uses his merit,

you guys really confuse me,

weather someone rewards merit passively for content he likes or actively for content he desires is no difference.

ok there is something we should truly clear here,

whats the difference between spending/rewarding merit actively or passively?

you are demonising the active merit rewarding, for content desired, and not accidentally found.

Quote
That is not a way to improve the quality of the forum. Besides, you are demanding the writer to post the article also to a blog (which is yours, I assume) beside this forum which shows that the basic purpose of this is not to provide quality content to the forum in exchange of Merits but to fulfill a personal need, and that is not how Merits are to be used. I doubt if someone really told you to use your Merits this way.

it is a good and effective way according to my estimation, not according to bitcoin cash chearleading agenda.
sr. member
Activity: 1204
Merit: 290
if i could get a good article on a topic that i consider important while others dont, for various reasons (agenda, invested)

There is no restrictions on asking to get an article on any topic, but the thing you offer in exchange is what's the reason of concern here. You could simply post this in Services section asking for the same thing but offering some currency as reward for that like Bitcoins or any other cryptocurrency (It would have been in Altcoins section if it were to be paid in something beside Bitcoin though), but you offer to reward the person with Merits for this which is what no one should do because it is considered trading Merits as you are giving them away in exchange of something.

i then can still improve the quality of this forum, and i was told thats how i am supposed to use merit for and here i try.

why this outcry now?

That is not a way to improve the quality of the forum. Besides, you are demanding the writer to post the article also to a blog (which is yours, I assume) beside this forum which shows that the basic purpose of this is not to provide quality content to the forum in exchange of Merits but to fulfill a personal need, and that is not how Merits are to be used. I doubt if someone really told you to use your Merits this way.

so why i am being blamed for trying to use merit in a good and effective way??? Huh

This is not a good and effective way of using Merits. You are using them for your own good but not for the betterment of the forum or for qualitative contributions towards the forum. Merits are well used if they are given away to the posts that are constructive for the forum, not if they are given away in exchange of something.
sr. member
Activity: 1470
Merit: 325
It is a thin line to pay merit for services.  Merit should not be treated as any kind of currency.

As a merit source, I have lots, and I have lots of work I need done on BPIP.  But I feel it is morally wrong to pay with merit.

:/

jes regarding perfectionism, bitcoin broke also a bunch of moral laws regarding social justice understanding in democratic states,

if i could get a good article on a topic that i consider important while others dont, for various reasons (agenda, invested)

i then can still improve the quality of this forum, and i was told thats how i am supposed to use merit for and here i try.

why this outcry now?

if someone thinks that something should be pointed out, he could write out a merit reward, and there are many that seek to earn stable and reliably merit. thats a huge opportunity for those and the forum.

so why i am being blamed for trying to use merit in a good and effective way??? Huh
full member
Activity: 336
Merit: 203

the article will be then also posted on the c-pro blog : https://www.cryptoproductivity.com/blog besides Bitcointalk.org


Since you are requesting the article to be posted in your blog, this is a merit transaction. You can be understood as paying with merit for generating contents in your personal site.
I was thinking in writing and answer to your question `till I read this.
Vod
legendary
Activity: 3668
Merit: 3010
Licking my boob since 1970
It is a thin line to pay merit for services.  Merit should not be treated as any kind of currency.

As a merit source, I have lots, and I have lots of work I need done on BPIP.  But I feel it is morally wrong to pay with merit.

:/
sr. member
Activity: 1470
Merit: 325
OP, you sent me this PM the other day:
can you pls remove finally that negative trust,

i have learned that rule by now.

regards
But it appears you've learned absolutely nothing, because you're offering merits in exchange for services, which is against what the merit system is about.  That's basically selling them, which is against the rules--and you wonder why I didn't remove the feedback I left you.  Hopefully another DT member will swoop up and slap you with another negative.  You should lock this thread and hope it gets to page 10 quick.

sevices?

ohm i was actually testing this way to get a good article developed and posted here with my merit and tried this merit reward giveaway out.

merit givaways were posted in this forum, so i try to promote a certain article, that i consider important and useful.

it seems everything that doesnt has direct interconnection with bitcoin core cheerleading in this forum is a "tool of the devil" that is hated and hunted by the mods. Sad

a good article on infrastructure cryptocurrencies is something good for this forum and i was seeking to spend my merit to motivate someone to write one,
i was doing everything right even if its not the "bitcoin core" cheerleading that is mainly desired here.

if the thread doesnt belong to this section of the forum then move it, i still stand by my intention its a good one and i want to spend merit for a quality article to improve forum quality.
legendary
Activity: 3500
Merit: 6981
Top Crypto Casino
OP, you sent me this PM the other day:
ohm i was actually seeking to get a good article developed and posted here with my merit and tried this merit reward giveaway out.
Yes, but the difference is that you're requesting something very specific to be written for you, not just awarding merits for good posts.  It's a huge difference that I'm not surprised you don't see.
sr. member
Activity: 1470
Merit: 325
You realise that you are talking about something which is meaning that you are trying to trade your 18 merits with some article writing job?

ohm jes i do that, people spend lots of time writing articles or good posts i give a lot of merit for a topic that i consider important and good.

You realise this will gonna get you more redTrust from DT members? I suggest to understand how merit works for the forum before you make anymore wrong move.

Ref: Removal of Illegit negative Trust

I hate to bring this on table but your tendency makes me wonder that you had some interesting deal with RYXES? It's 4:4 with RYXES. If it's true then that's a misuse of merits and clearly a disrespectful act to the forum and it's members.

ImageLoading...
Click here if unable to see image


Update:
I don't know if it is wrong character although probably if you post this merit giveaway on Service Section somehow a person have that kind of article.

Have you ever read a phrase like sMerits for art?

OP is asking for article writing in the mentioned blog. Surely it's will be exchanged for personal interest benefit. Merit is not here to gain personal benefits nor here to give in a post just because you like it.

The sMerit for artwork was not the same kind of deal, if my memory is serving me right.

besides the entire post of you are just ridicoulous garbage

what has this to do with me writing out a merit legit reward for a good and humanistic cryptoeconomic article?

i have the freedom,
to promote an article that is according to my knowledge important and useful and good for this forum.

its called "freedom of oppinion and expression"

dont play some kind of censorship voldermord in my thread here, just because you are unable to earn my merit.
copper member
Activity: 630
Merit: 420
We are Bitcoin!
You realise that you are talking about something which is meaning that you are trying to trade your 18 merits with some article writing job?

ohm jes i do that, people spend lots of time writing articles or good posts i give a lot of merit for a topic that i consider important and good.

You realise this will gonna get you more redTrust from DT members? I suggest to understand how merit works for the forum before you make anymore wrong move.

Ref: Removal of Illegit negative Trust

I hate to bring this on table but your tendency makes me wonder that you had some interesting deal with RYXES? It's 4:4 with RYXES. If it's true then that's a misuse of merits and clearly a disrespectful act to the forum and it's members.

ImageLoading...
Click here if unable to see image


Update:
I don't know if it is wrong character although probably if you post this merit giveaway on Service Section somehow a person have that kind of article.

Have you ever read a phrase like sMerits for art?

OP is asking for article writing in the mentioned blog. Surely it's will be exchanged for personal interest benefit. Merit is not here to gain personal benefits nor here to give in a post just because you like it.

The sMerit for artwork was not the same kind of deal, if my memory is serving me right.
sr. member
Activity: 1470
Merit: 325
I don't know if it is wrong character although probably if you post this merit giveaway on Service Section somehow a person have that kind of article.

Have you ever read a phrase like sMerits for art?
no but thanks to you i know now,

i will report this article into the service section but will be also happy if the mod moves it there

regards
copper member
Activity: 434
Merit: 278
Offering Escrow 0.5 % fee
I don't know if it is wrong character although probably if you post this merit giveaway on Service Section somehow a person have that kind of article.

Have you ever read a phrase like sMerits for art?
sr. member
Activity: 1470
Merit: 325
so since i cant spend my merit i write here out what kind of article i want to have to earn my merit:

i want a goods researched article on

1.Infrastructure & Value Sources related CryptoCurrencies,

2. addtionally the topic must cover the threat of waste of ressources that comes with cryptoeconomics and possible solutions for that (like store grades for efficiency)

3. optional way to ensure executive quality of those Token (like branch selfregulation)

and how society can deal with those

the article will be then also posted on the c-pro blog : https://www.cryptoproductivity.com/blog

i will give away up 18 merit depending on the quality of that article

you can then also earn merit from other sources for that article not just from me

regards


You realise that you are talking about something which is meaning that you are trying to trade your 18 merits with some article writing job?

ohm jes i do that, people spend lots of time writing articles or good posts i give a lot of merit for a topic that i consider important and good.
copper member
Activity: 630
Merit: 420
We are Bitcoin!
so since i cant spend my merit i write here out what kind of article i want to have to earn my merit:

i want a goods researched article on

1.Infrastructure & Value Sources related CryptoCurrencies,

2. addtionally the topic must cover the threat of waste of ressources that comes with cryptoeconomics and possible solutions for that (like store grades for efficiency)

3. optional way to ensure executive quality of those Token (like branch selfregulation)

and how society can deal with those

the article will be then also posted on the c-pro blog : https://www.cryptoproductivity.com/blog

i will give away up 18 merit depending on the quality of that article

you can then also earn merit from other sources for that article not just from me

regards


You realise that you are talking about something which is meaning that you are trying to trade your 18 merits with some article writing job?

Seems like you missed reading the basics of spending your sMerits...
...I encourage people to give merit to posts that are objectively high-quality, not just posts that you agree with.
sr. member
Activity: 1470
Merit: 325
so since i cant spend my merit i write here out what kind of article i want to have to earn my merit:

i want a goods researched article on

1.Infrastructure & Value Sources related CryptoCurrencies,

2. addtionally the topic must cover the threat of waste of ressources that comes with cryptoeconomics and possible solutions for that (like store grades for efficiency)

3. optional way to ensure executive quality of those Token (like branch selfregulation)

and how society can deal with those

the article will be then also posted on the c-pro blog : https://www.cryptoproductivity.com/blog besides Bitcointalk.org

i will give away up all my remaining 18 merit depending on the quality of that article

you can then also earn merit from from other sources for that article not just from me

regards

Jump to: