Topic: IBM working with US Federal banks to develop digital currency (Read 2366 times)

I have to say that's some kind of different story. The coin is still a work in progress and people now are used to using credit cards, bitcoin,... it will take a while to get that currency to work right away. Yes I agree that the paper money or the credit or debit card now are also monitored by the government but they have limitations that make the government to act right away like digital currency ( I mean if you use cash, for example, to buy some drugs, police will not just come out from nowhere and take you money then arrest you) but with digital currency, they can detect it immediately and may somehow block that money. This is still my opinion. When this coin becomes popular of course I will have to but for now maybe not

What do you mean you with "support"? To not use those?

If yes, I have some questions for you. Do you use other money in your life? Do your use credit or debit card in you life? For sure yes. If not you cannot live. Those are essential part of life for everyone of us. Why you use those if they are monitored by the Government?

Then if the new coin (if it will be created because until now everything that is sure is that "are only words") will be used in the same way like your national currency used actually in your country and will have the same status like it, why you will use the second and not the first? Both are equally monitored by your Government. If the digital coin will be much more convenient in its use (compared to the other currency) and you will not use it who will have "damages" in this case: you or your Government?

OK... the government don't love bitcoin but how it works? Under any circumstances, a digital currency created by goverment or any organization, coorperation will be monitored somehow. This will make digital lose its decentralization. No way I gonna support it

IBM just smell the big cash, so they are rushing to develop digital currency as one of first  First come, first served 

IBM is considering adopting the underlying technology behind bitcoin, known as the "blockchain," to create a digital cash and payment system for major currencies.The objective is to allow people to transfer cash or make payments instantaneously using this technology without a bank or clearing party involved, saving on transaction costs. The transactions wouldbe in an open ledger of a specific country's currency such as the dollar or euro.The blockchain - a ledger, or list, of all of a digital currency's transactions is viewed as bitcoin's main technological innovation, allowing users to make payments anonymously, instantly, and without government regulation.Rather than stored on a separate server and controlled by an individual, company, or bank, the ledger is open and accessible to all participants in the bitcoin network.The proposed digital currency system would work in a similar way.

Thay work,work and they will work.IBM is dead,thay have many project like smart planet etc,internt of things,on any of that project thay are getting nice grants from Washington
Banks dont want transparent,fast,payment system.it is against of his interest

They will enact laws that will "force" you to use it, or it will make bitcoin so disadvantageous to use that they will crush the membership

Who knows, I hope it doesnt happen, but it is the way the things are headed now.

I see the content of the article of the OP in the post below but any comment. Naturally Cutesakura (the author of post) cannot pretend that is him the author of the article. So remain mister for me the post of this post.

Could its author give some explanations about the "why" of this its post? Some explanations or interpretations? So we can learn more about its idea about this thread and about the posts written on it.

Maybe there are big errors made from some poster in this thread and needed basic corrections. Me, as author of many comments, could be one of them. The probabilities to be me are to high. If me such person, would love to understand where I'm wrong or what's wrong with my thoughts. Everything is totally new and the thoughts can be created erroneous more easily.  

So Cutesakura stay in touch with us ....

International Business Machines Corp is considering adopting the underlying technology behind bitcoin, known as the "blockchain," to create a digital cash and payment system for major currencies, according to a person familiar with the matter.

The objective is to allow people to transfer cash or make payments instantaneously using this technology without a bank or clearing party involved, saving on transaction costs, the person said. The transactions would be in an open ledger of a specific country's currency such as the dollar or euro, said the source, who declined to be identified because of a lack of authorization to discuss the project in public.

The blockchain - a ledger, or list, of all of a digital currency's transactions - is viewed as bitcoin's main technological innovation, allowing users to make payments anonymously, instantly, and without government regulation.

Rather than stored on a separate server and controlled by an individual, company, or bank, the ledger is open and accessible to all participants in the bitcoin network.

The proposed digital currency system would work in a similar way.

"When somebody wants to transact in the system, instead of you trying to acquire a bitcoin, you simply say, here are some U.S. dollars," the source said. "It's sort of a bitcoin but without the bitcoin."

IBM is one of a number of tech companies looking to expand the use of the blockchain technology beyond bitcoin, the digital currency launched six years ago that has spurred a following among investors and tech enthusiasts.

The company has been in informal discussions about a blockchain-tied cash system with a number of central banks, including the U.S. Federal Reserve, the source said. If central banks approve the concept, IBM will build the secure and scalable infrastructure for the project.

IBM media relations office did not respond to Reuters emails about this story and the Fed declined to comment.

However, there are signs that central banks are already thinking about the innovations that could arise through digital currency systems. The Bank of England, in a report in September 2014, described the blockchain's open ledger as a "significant innovation" that could transform the financial system more generally.

Instead of having ledgers maintained by banks that act as a record of an individual's transactions, this kind of open ledger would be viewable by everyone using the system, and would use an agreed-upon process for entering transactions into the system.

The project is still in the early stages and constantly evolving, the source said. It is also unclear how concerns about money-laundering and criminal activities that have hamstrung bitcoin.

Unlike bitcoin, where the network is decentralized and there is no overseer, the proposed digital currency system would be controlled by central banks, the source said.

"These coins will be part of the money supply," the source said. "It's the same money, just not a dollar bill with a serial number on it, but a token that sits on this blockchain."

According to the plans, the digital currency could be linked to a person's bank account, possibly using a wallet software that would integrate that account with the proposed digital currency ledger.

"We are at a tipping point right now. It's making a lot more sense for some type of digital cash in the system, that not only saves our government money, but also is a lot more convenient and secure for individuals to use," the source said.

Some interesting thoughts here guys. Something that banks should also consider is me. I can not be compelled to use their blockchain inventions. I might use them if there is some real advantage but bitcoin is my currency now and any system they want me to participate in must involve bitcoin. Other than that I only need a safe deposit box from a bank. And I only need that to store USB sticks with bitcoins on them.

To tell the right I am lost in your post.   Seems to mess. To many thoughts told shortly and maybe it is not your the fault. So will answer only to the things that I understand.

First we can go ahead without doing castle in the air. In other words such national digital coin must be made and have the status about which is mentioned before. Then discuss about it. But since exist this thread we can discuss only to pass the time and to change opinions. So every thought or interpretation below or above must have the big IF before. So, if it will be created and if will replace us dollar. For the moment we know that there are only discussions and words from an article. That's are not at all enough to tell that the above and the below about this supposed digital coin can be true.

Lets continue then with the suppositions or interpretations about your post. Following it and without doing reference at every your thoughts (because the post will be very long) i can tell that:

Yes, I believe that if USA will introduce such digital coin as its national formal money will be followed probably not immediately but in time for sure, from all the other countries of all the world.

I think that this coin will work like a clock so disagree with you about this. Why you like the bitcoin and not another coin secure and formal one like bitcoin made from your Authorities?

China will be obligated to know and work with this coin if it will be the national formal money of USA or will have this status - the same like us dollar (if it will be coexistence of both of those). If China will not accept this will suffer China itself.

I don't see any problem if all the countries of the world follow USA. Every of those have its national money. Where is the problem if this national money become digital coin money? On the contrary, I think that this would a big step ahead for every economy of every country and for all the world.

That's the end of that I understand from your post. As for bitcoin I can give you two other threads who discus the position of bitcoin if in the world will be verified such situation as above written or about its possible place in the world of currencies.

You can make your discussion there if you want. You can discuss about everything and tell what you think (whatever can be your thoughts). But please with less passion and with more clear explanations:

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/discussions-about-digital-currencies-in-some-countries-what-future-for-bitcoin-1205842

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/bitcoin-as-currency-of-currencies-1191118

above could be...I would add to this that if it did happen (say USA first) then all countries would try the same..but MOST would not work ..because same issue as now..China would not trust a crypto coin backed by usa or vice versa...make that 180 countries make their own crypto version of some manner you state above..

the catch is bitcoin would probably GAIN value in the above as an alternative of a gov't's coin creation in the above manner...(prob closed source) ..the world has enough issues screaming about how the usd dominates the world of commerce with the US dollar now...or how the internet is too USA centralized......so these gov't coins may indeed be coming ..but again imho if it is that bad and that prevalent as you seem to say....then open source crypto (likely bitcoin) would really thrive imho as an alternative..i mean would you be a big fan of 'ivory coast coin' crypto? or would you just go around all the banks/gov't etc on the open crypto ...again likely bitcoin ...China/Russia/Iran etc may use usd now...but would not even think about trusting a crypto from USA especially if closed source imho ..just saying...and of course this is talking about govt's ..individuals I would think would even be more unlikely to do so ..even in the individual country...I like Canada ..but would not be all fired up to use Canadian Crypto say made with help of say Canadian Bankers and the Gov't no matter how enlightened the coin may be...probably would not slam it as evil but sure as heck would not use/get or in anyway promote such ..I would at best be indifferent to such an attempt and as newbies got to know crypto I would assume the same if pressed at say that future time ..big yawn..

anyway will probably be something between our 2 extremes but you get my point ...(not that I now what I'm talking about) but the above came to mind

Everyone who make a little reasoning can understand that the (commercial) banks will use blockchain or the technology used to build it, not for creating their own coins. Everyone which think a little can understand that this is impossible. We will have millions of coins and all the (commercial) banks in discussion with all the other (commercial) banks to accept their coin. So every (commercial) bank will passe all its time in discussion to reach the needed collaboration with all the banks which collaborate about its coin. The same thing for other millions remaining. Then everyone of those will find the way that their coins have legal value. For this needed the permission of the Central Bank of the country. So other discussions with the Central Banks of every country; which will want the "why" of this choice. I can't find one. I think even the banks. So probably this permission cannot be given. In other words, the result will be an imaginable mess and an absurd situation where everyone cannot understand everyone.

Every (commercial) banks it is not so stupid to do or even wonder this. They work with the money and such kind of work need to much intelligence. If they do such work (with money) and survive or have profits from that, mean that are intelligent and not at all stupid.

So, who think that the (commercial) banks are working to know or implement the technology in which is based the creation of blockchain to create  a new personal digital coin is in big wrong.

They are studying blockchain to implement its technology not to create some clone or another digital coin. The technology of blockchain, named peer to peer realize, if applied, big reduction of costs. This is the reason of their study of blockchain. This is the power of peer to peer and from this reason is called disruptive. Remain to be understand the field (within the commercial bank) in which it will be applied but I think that the probability is to high that can be applied firstly at the transactions made from the bank. Aiming to reduce the costs connected with those. Anyhow this is a guess and as such remain to be verified.

It is a totally other thing the question treated from the OP. This is the case of the creation of e new coin. But it will be a coin created by and for the Federal Reserve, which is totally another typo of bank and have totally different duties. The digital coin created by the Federal Reserve (if it will be created) will have legal power. It will be like or will replace us dollar (according to the decisions taken by this bank). Will be owned by the state of USA and will be national legal currency of USA. With or within the us dollar. Will have formal power and will be not like the million other altcoins created by one or a group of developers who, in most of the cases, create the altcoin only to make some money and to forget it.

Everyone will be "forced" to use it. This national digital coin will serve for every relation with the Authorities, in this national digital coin will be every salary of everyone (whether it will be private or public the work which will be rewarded), this national digital coin will be used by every merchant etc. So everyone who want to live normally in USA will be "obligated" to use it. No one will ask to leave bitcoin because bitcoin is regulated in USA. But for sure will use this new digital coin created by and for Federal Reserve.

IF IT WILL BE CREATED AND IF WILL HAVE FORMAL POWER GIVEN BY FEDERAL RESERVE. THERE ARE ONLY DISCUSSIONS. THIS DOESN'T MEAN THAT FOR SURE WILL BE CREATED.

And it shall end up like all other alts so far
Reminds me of the intranet fad in the 90s, "this internet thing looks interesting, but we'll create our own safer and controlled version!"

Blockchain technology was so futuristic and high level so everyone wanna try to adopt it.
But I'm sure that would be heavily manipulated because of heavy centralization.

I haven't read this your question before. Could you show me please where it is?

Then, if it will be implemented such system, the reason will be known only by them which will implement it.

According to me, at least, because this kind of economic system, based in such kind of currency, realize (theoretically and if realized in a fair way) an stable and continuous economic increase and and a sustainable growth (without or with much less than the actual crisis).

Don't forget to show me when is made before your above answer. Waiting.....  

No country will introduce anything because countries are not agents or individuals.  They never have been  People wearing funny hats telling others they represent a country, on the other hand, might introduce whatever they like.  For the usual reasons. 

Yes that's the real scenario is going on now. Governments may think of creating an alt coin why banning bitcoin. Fortunately bitcoin does not need any governments approval to use it. So, nothing can stop the evolution of bitcoin. Bitcoin will be here without any problem initiated by any banks or regulations.

This would be centralized lol. Feds are seeing that dollar would be not that good anymore so they hold on to something which is more promising.

Thanks but no thanks. I would still use bitcoin over some centralized and regulated sht controlled by the feds and the banks.

Blockchain is only good for the banks to save and streamline their operations, they may create their own currency but as many others have said these attempts will ultimately fail.  They are trying really hard to separate the blockchain from Bitcoin, Bitcoin is where it's at and where it will be at in the coming years.