[2013-05-14 18:43:44] Icarus Detect: Test failed at /dev/ttyUSB0: get 00000000, should: 000187a2
[2013-05-14 18:43:44] Icarus Detect: Test failed at /dev/ttyUSB1: get 00000000, should: 000187a2
[2013-05-14 18:43:44] Icarus Detect: Test failed at /dev/ttyUSB4: get 00000000, should: 000187a2
[2013-05-14 18:43:44] Icarus Detect: Test failed at /dev/ttyUSB5: get 00000000, should: 000187a2
[2013-05-14 18:43:44] Icarus Detect: Test failed at /dev/ttyUSB8: get 00000000, should: 000187a2
[2013-05-14 18:43:44] Icarus Detect: Test failed at /dev/ttyUSB9: get 00000000, should: 000187a2
But the other 6 seem to work!
ICA 0: | 394.8M/394.9Mh/s | A:6 R:0 HW:0 U: 2.36/m
ICA 1: | 387.2M/376.2Mh/s | A:5 R:0 HW:0 U: 1.96/m
ICA 2: | 388.2M/374.9Mh/s | A:6 R:0 HW:0 U: 2.36/m
ICA 3: | 387.5M/373.5Mh/s | A:3 R:0 HW:0 U: 1.18/m
ICA 4: | 391.4M/394.6Mh/s | A:7 R:0 HW:0 U: 2.75/m
ICA 5: | 390.6M/376.5Mh/s | A:3 R:0 HW:0 U: 1.18/m
Indeed, adding up the advertised hash rates for the 6 devices that appear to be working, I seem to arrive at something like the hash rate I was expecting to receive:
394 + 387 + 388 + 387 + 391 + 390 = 2337 Mh/s.
So I'm a bit confused. But hey, I appear to be mining! Yay!
Er, is this behaviour expected?
There are two versions of firmware for cm1s. One uses pairs, the other identifies each fpga. It's been a long time since I've messed with them, so I can't remember exactly which is which, but I believe glasswalkers is the one that uses 4. There's a cm1 users thread buried somewhere with all the info