Topic: ICO Bench, what are you doing? (Read 769 times)
Ofcourse some of review are not reliable i can see so many successful ICO which has a very low rating on icobench.
Nah, I don't think ICOBench even are that stupid (to do bad reviews and ask money for edits). That's basically just blackmail and anyone knows blackmail, no matter the ends, won't get you anywhere. The law is very clear on that, blackmail, like murder, crime, no matter for good or bad.
But come on guys, surely you know by now that all sites are useful for a certain limit of information, right? Get what you need, no need to have trust for all the rest of them.
But come on guys, surely you know by now that all sites are useful for a certain limit of information, right? Get what you need, no need to have trust for all the rest of them.
I bet everyone who is in crypto at least half a year doesn't take seriously ICObench.
For me it is just payed website to search new projects, but I don't care about their 5 star rates, because it is bullshit.
For me it is just payed website to search new projects, but I don't care about their 5 star rates, because it is bullshit.
That`s website is good and we can use to choose some posible good bounty campaign but dont use this information as main source of information in choosing bounty campaign because not all time that website is reliable to choose good bounty program because we need to remember nobody's perfect that is why we need to learn how to choose good project in your own knowledge.
It seems to me, everyone has long known that rating agencies have been bought. Therefore, you shouldn’t rely only on their assessment in selecting ICO. Icodrops is one of the rating agencies that you can still trust. However, in general, now it isn’t the best time for ICO investments.
Suspicious activity on our favorite site icobench.com
It still began with the article https://hackernoon.com/beware-of-ico-bench-97addacfedc7 from Philip.
Where he unflatteringly speaks about the experts on this listing, also looking at several ICOs and their ratings, I noticed testimonials from ico-experts, who say so softly contradict themselves.
What do you think, is this their new kind of earnings?
Leave a bad review and then ask for money for editing reviews?
It is very interesting to hear your opinion.
We should be responsible for our own money and decide base on facts that we research from them not on the bias reviews from those ICOs reviews site. Those sites can make a good reviews in exchange of money. It's business they need money to maintain their sites. It still began with the article https://hackernoon.com/beware-of-ico-bench-97addacfedc7 from Philip.
Where he unflatteringly speaks about the experts on this listing, also looking at several ICOs and their ratings, I noticed testimonials from ico-experts, who say so softly contradict themselves.
What do you think, is this their new kind of earnings?
Leave a bad review and then ask for money for editing reviews?
It is very interesting to hear your opinion.
Ico rating sites is losing a lot of confidence in the eyes of crypto investors. The reviews of the projects don’t reflect the truth.
Selling website. I watched ratings there earlier and then understood that there all projects buy to themselves good rating.
I think it's not a secret anymore. that's why the site rating could not be definite about the size of how good the project running because their system even as it is. certainly it's their trick to get results but certainly, it was not justified. own analysis will be even better I think of relying on such sites.
full member
Activity: 660
Merit: 101
Colletrix - Bridging the Physical and Virtual Worl
Suspicious activity on our favorite site icobench.com
It still began with the article https://hackernoon.com/beware-of-ico-bench-97addacfedc7 from Philip.
Where he unflatteringly speaks about the experts on this listing, also looking at several ICOs and their ratings, I noticed testimonials from ico-experts, who say so softly contradict themselves.
What do you think, is this their new kind of earnings?
Leave a bad review and then ask for money for editing reviews?
It is very interesting to hear your opinion.
It still began with the article https://hackernoon.com/beware-of-ico-bench-97addacfedc7 from Philip.
Where he unflatteringly speaks about the experts on this listing, also looking at several ICOs and their ratings, I noticed testimonials from ico-experts, who say so softly contradict themselves.
What do you think, is this their new kind of earnings?
Leave a bad review and then ask for money for editing reviews?
It is very interesting to hear your opinion.
I think Icobench is a paid surveyor and I don't even believe in it dright now. When I start in crypto, I had been following Icobench but right now I feel like it's not reliable anymore.
Suspicious activity on our favorite site icobench.com
It still began with the article https://hackernoon.com/beware-of-ico-bench-97addacfedc7 from Philip.
Where he unflatteringly speaks about the experts on this listing, also looking at several ICOs and their ratings, I noticed testimonials from ico-experts, who say so softly contradict themselves.
What do you think, is this their new kind of earnings?
Leave a bad review and then ask for money for editing reviews?
It is very interesting to hear your opinion.
It still began with the article https://hackernoon.com/beware-of-ico-bench-97addacfedc7 from Philip.
Where he unflatteringly speaks about the experts on this listing, also looking at several ICOs and their ratings, I noticed testimonials from ico-experts, who say so softly contradict themselves.
What do you think, is this their new kind of earnings?
Leave a bad review and then ask for money for editing reviews?
It is very interesting to hear your opinion.
I think Icobench is a paid surveyor and I don't even believe in it dright now. When I start in crypto, I had been following Icobench but right now I feel like it's not reliable anymore.
I do not trust any sites that give an ICO rating, as they just make money on it. You can see only if you want to know some information about the project.
I've been in the crypto industry for a long time and there was a time that I want to invest into some new ICO just to test out how does it work qhat I've tried is to do some new ICOs online, read reviews and ended up to different ICO review sites there was a new ICO they're promoting that it encourages me to invest on it and guess what?
The project is a scam. Well i don't 100% believe that ICO bench and the likes give 100% review it's a business afterall they can make a great review in exchange of great payment however that doen't mean that there are no legit or great projects out there, the best thing to so is to review the ICO by ourselves and conduct our own reviews.
The project is a scam. Well i don't 100% believe that ICO bench and the likes give 100% review it's a business afterall they can make a great review in exchange of great payment however that doen't mean that there are no legit or great projects out there, the best thing to so is to review the ICO by ourselves and conduct our own reviews.
Suspicious activity on our favorite site icobench.com
It still began with the article https://hackernoon.com/beware-of-ico-bench-97addacfedc7 from Philip.
Where he unflatteringly speaks about the experts on this listing, also looking at several ICOs and their ratings, I noticed testimonials from ico-experts, who say so softly contradict themselves.
What do you think, is this their new kind of earnings?
Leave a bad review and then ask for money for editing reviews?
It is very interesting to hear your opinion.
It still began with the article https://hackernoon.com/beware-of-ico-bench-97addacfedc7 from Philip.
Where he unflatteringly speaks about the experts on this listing, also looking at several ICOs and their ratings, I noticed testimonials from ico-experts, who say so softly contradict themselves.
What do you think, is this their new kind of earnings?
Leave a bad review and then ask for money for editing reviews?
It is very interesting to hear your opinion.
This is very bad. Corruption has already reached here. I think it is not bad, you want a good review. Pay. This may adversely affect the confidence in the cryptocurrency. I'm upset.
Suspicious activity on our favorite site icobench.com
It still began with the article https://hackernoon.com/beware-of-ico-bench-97addacfedc7 from Philip.
Where he unflatteringly speaks about the experts on this listing, also looking at several ICOs and their ratings, I noticed testimonials from ico-experts, who say so softly contradict themselves.
What do you think, is this their new kind of earnings?
Leave a bad review and then ask for money for editing reviews?
It is very interesting to hear your opinion.
It still began with the article https://hackernoon.com/beware-of-ico-bench-97addacfedc7 from Philip.
Where he unflatteringly speaks about the experts on this listing, also looking at several ICOs and their ratings, I noticed testimonials from ico-experts, who say so softly contradict themselves.
What do you think, is this their new kind of earnings?
Leave a bad review and then ask for money for editing reviews?
It is very interesting to hear your opinion.
yes that is their new profession. that's why I don't trust any ICO rating website. they are only fraudsters who disguise themselves as ICO experts.
Suspicious activity on our favorite site icobench.com
It still began with the article https://hackernoon.com/beware-of-ico-bench-97addacfedc7 from Philip.
Where he unflatteringly speaks about the experts on this listing, also looking at several ICOs and their ratings, I noticed testimonials from ico-experts, who say so softly contradict themselves.
What do you think, is this their new kind of earnings?
Leave a bad review and then ask for money for editing reviews?
It is very interesting to hear your opinion.
There is nothing as good as your own due diligence and for the fact that experts are humans like you and most of them are just simply looking for a means to get richer, it has really corrupted the way a lot of them tend to do things with integrity over time and therefore get to mislead people eventually. It still began with the article https://hackernoon.com/beware-of-ico-bench-97addacfedc7 from Philip.
Where he unflatteringly speaks about the experts on this listing, also looking at several ICOs and their ratings, I noticed testimonials from ico-experts, who say so softly contradict themselves.
What do you think, is this their new kind of earnings?
Leave a bad review and then ask for money for editing reviews?
It is very interesting to hear your opinion.
What is important as an individual is to at least make sure that you have your own understanding of the market, know how to do your research and due diligence, know what to look for in a project which is basically the team, product and business solution, and then with this you would not have to rely on some experts before making your own decisions.
I don't trust icobench because their rating and expert review untrustworthy, I think some of them is pay per review to increase high rating score, my opinion is icodrop better than icobench, a lot of project listed on icobench with high score, but project owner run away at the end, I just use the site to check the project ICO price, other information: don't trust it
It is a platform, it is there to guide, these are reviews done by humans, and the last time I checked, it is said categorically that no matter what, as an investor, you should always do your own due diligence, so, in a way I do not see the reason why people should be putting blame on ICO review platforms. Trust yourself, as that is the main thing anyone should be doing and make sure you always do your own research as this is the only way you can be sure of whatever you are investing in. It is your own money and you should not let anyone make you decide what you should be doing with it.
I still make use of ICObench though to see what people are talking about, but it is just a guide, knowing the number of ICOs in the space and having to filter them, but it is just a way to know what I want to be researching into myself, which is the team of this projects, the availability of a standard product, and the solution the product is actually bringing. If people cannot get to do all those by themselves, then they should not even be investing in the first place.
Suspicious activity on our favorite site icobench.com
It still began with the article https://hackernoon.com/beware-of-ico-bench-97addacfedc7 from Philip.
Where he unflatteringly speaks about the experts on this listing, also looking at several ICOs and their ratings, I noticed testimonials from ico-experts, who say so softly contradict themselves.
What do you think, is this their new kind of earnings?
Leave a bad review and then ask for money for editing reviews?
It is very interesting to hear your opinion.
Why so surprise? Im sure just recently discover how these doggos do work and doing shady stuffs. As long there are review sites they are really prone into such possible bias reviews.It still began with the article https://hackernoon.com/beware-of-ico-bench-97addacfedc7 from Philip.
Where he unflatteringly speaks about the experts on this listing, also looking at several ICOs and their ratings, I noticed testimonials from ico-experts, who say so softly contradict themselves.
What do you think, is this their new kind of earnings?
Leave a bad review and then ask for money for editing reviews?
It is very interesting to hear your opinion.
Due to they are on the possibility on being paid just to make some so-called expert reviews from others just to show-off that their project is worth to invest on but the truth
this do really wipes out the credibility of their service and this is why i dont really easily trust up these review sites.
ICO should not rely too much on rating sites. They're always open to manipulation. But ICOBench is one of the better ones.
This site was created in order to sell the ads and promote ICOs. It is obvious, isn't it? People make money, and icobench is just another tool for promotion)
Suspicious activity on our favorite site icobench.com
It still began with the article https://hackernoon.com/beware-of-ico-bench-97addacfedc7 from Philip.
Where he unflatteringly speaks about the experts on this listing, also looking at several ICOs and their ratings, I noticed testimonials from ico-experts, who say so softly contradict themselves.
What do you think, is this their new kind of earnings?
Leave a bad review and then ask for money for editing reviews?
It is very interesting to hear your opinion.
It still began with the article https://hackernoon.com/beware-of-ico-bench-97addacfedc7 from Philip.
Where he unflatteringly speaks about the experts on this listing, also looking at several ICOs and their ratings, I noticed testimonials from ico-experts, who say so softly contradict themselves.
What do you think, is this their new kind of earnings?
Leave a bad review and then ask for money for editing reviews?
It is very interesting to hear your opinion.
He does not ask. He's just hanging it here. They contact him and pay money. Well, I think rating systems lie to us. The one who pays the most gets the most. This form of business. See how many of these rating agencies are now.
the most logical answer by far.
people started to forget the reason why did they create that kind of project, rating is part of business. all of them will say something or rate you based on how much your money, plus some of them will ask you a listing fee in order to get listed or get rated by them.
that is why it is advisable to collect the information from many sites or many sources.
remember, people will not do something if they do not get something in return
Jump to: