📣Good day everyone!
🤔For those of you who do not know, almost every day we organize a small give-aways of JRT! All you need to do is to answer the question about our project, the first to give the right answer wins the token!💸
❓Yesterdays question for 25 JRT💰 was: “Will Jarvis Exchange require a user to go through the KYC in order to trade on the platform?”
Do you want to be a part of it? Join our telegram: https://t.me/jarvisexchange
Topic: [ICO ENDED] Jarvis - Fx, crypto, stocks | DApp browser | Revenue token - page 30. (Read 44793 times)
April 04, 2019, 06:59:29 AM
April 04, 2019, 03:00:59 AM
They will succeed to launch exchange that is not what I am looking at but my eyes are on the strategy and plan of post launch era. I will talk straight there have been launched few other exchanges but they all are struggling. For me more important is to make the exchange successful by convincing traders and market to use it. It is trading volume which decided the future of any trading platform.
April 03, 2019, 03:04:55 PM
They ware working on it and hope distribution will happen this week (seen on telegram) ! I have no doubt it will come soon, Jarvis never despointed my until now. 
April 03, 2019, 10:24:39 AM
Hello everyone,
So we have identified the issue : the smartcontract could not handle multi-sender features (this we knew it), this is why we have used a multi-sender application.
But even by using this application, the smartcontract required to confirm each single transaction, so the Ledger did... in a moment metamask crashed, so I guess it has this moment that tokens has been sent multiple time.
We are now fixing it
So we have identified the issue : the smartcontract could not handle multi-sender features (this we knew it), this is why we have used a multi-sender application.
But even by using this application, the smartcontract required to confirm each single transaction, so the Ledger did... in a moment metamask crashed, so I guess it has this moment that tokens has been sent multiple time.
We are now fixing it
What's the possible solution now? Will you create a brand new contract and distribute to the holders new tokens?
The tokens that they have sent are now useless, we will have to wait for them come out with a new token and that will be another long wait, hopefully not, in my experienced this is the second coin that I've participated where they issue two tokens and it took them months to launch another one, I hope this will not be the case here.
Well, it seems they identified the problem and fixing it now. I don't see a reason why this should now take them (several) months to set up the new contract and distribute the new tokens.
April 03, 2019, 10:16:09 AM
Hello everyone,
So we have identified the issue : the smartcontract could not handle multi-sender features (this we knew it), this is why we have used a multi-sender application.
But even by using this application, the smartcontract required to confirm each single transaction, so the Ledger did... in a moment metamask crashed, so I guess it has this moment that tokens has been sent multiple time.
We are now fixing it
So we have identified the issue : the smartcontract could not handle multi-sender features (this we knew it), this is why we have used a multi-sender application.
But even by using this application, the smartcontract required to confirm each single transaction, so the Ledger did... in a moment metamask crashed, so I guess it has this moment that tokens has been sent multiple time.
We are now fixing it
What's the possible solution now? Will you create a brand new contract and distribute to the holders new tokens?
The tokens that they have sent are now useless, we will have to wait for them come out with a new token and that will be another long wait, hopefully not, in my experienced this is the second coin that I've participated where they issue two tokens and it took them months to launch another one, I hope this will not be the case here.
April 03, 2019, 02:31:09 AM
Hello everyone,
So we have identified the issue : the smartcontract could not handle multi-sender features (this we knew it), this is why we have used a multi-sender application.
But even by using this application, the smartcontract required to confirm each single transaction, so the Ledger did... in a moment metamask crashed, so I guess it has this moment that tokens has been sent multiple time.
We are now fixing it
So we have identified the issue : the smartcontract could not handle multi-sender features (this we knew it), this is why we have used a multi-sender application.
But even by using this application, the smartcontract required to confirm each single transaction, so the Ledger did... in a moment metamask crashed, so I guess it has this moment that tokens has been sent multiple time.
We are now fixing it
What's the possible solution now? Will you create a brand new contract and distribute to the holders new tokens?
April 02, 2019, 02:49:36 PM
No reason to worry Team already started to send new Jrt tokens ! I'm pretty certain we'll all get what we deserve soon and then patiently wait until products are launched !
Bounty was great and very well managed. To me this team is really serious and i perfectly understand such a mistake (technical, human ?) could occur ! Let's go ahead now
Team already started to send new Jrt tokens ! I'm pretty certain we'll all get what we deserve soon and then patiently wait until products are launched ! Bounty was great and very well managed. To me this team is really serious and i perfectly understand such a mistake (technical, human ?) could occur ! Let's go ahead now
Of course, the team's activities look very diligent and promising. only I am interested in which exchanges will be able to buy and sell these tokens?
It seems that the team will begin to move in the direction of liquidity, when they have the finished product. And for this, in the near future, we can not expect any listing.
April 02, 2019, 02:09:21 PM
No reason to worry Team already started to send new Jrt tokens ! I'm pretty certain we'll all get what we deserve soon and then patiently wait until products are launched !
Bounty was great and very well managed. To me this team is really serious and i perfectly understand such a mistake (technical, human ?) could occur ! Let's go ahead now
Team already started to send new Jrt tokens ! I'm pretty certain we'll all get what we deserve soon and then patiently wait until products are launched ! Bounty was great and very well managed. To me this team is really serious and i perfectly understand such a mistake (technical, human ?) could occur ! Let's go ahead now
No, the token distribition has not started yet and no one has recieved the new tokens. The new contract has not even created yet.
Yes, your totally right mate
I thought distribution on new Jrt was started (i probably missread or did not understood something on Telegram 
). As you said it's not started but team is working on it ! 
April 02, 2019, 01:00:46 PM
No reason to worry Team already started to send new Jrt tokens ! I'm pretty certain we'll all get what we deserve soon and then patiently wait until products are launched !
Bounty was great and very well managed. To me this team is really serious and i perfectly understand such a mistake (technical, human ?) could occur ! Let's go ahead now
Team already started to send new Jrt tokens ! I'm pretty certain we'll all get what we deserve soon and then patiently wait until products are launched ! Bounty was great and very well managed. To me this team is really serious and i perfectly understand such a mistake (technical, human ?) could occur ! Let's go ahead now
Of course, the team's activities look very diligent and promising. only I am interested in which exchanges will be able to buy and sell these tokens?
April 02, 2019, 12:15:27 PM
Hello everyone,
So we have identified the issue : the smartcontract could not handle multi-sender features (this we knew it), this is why we have used a multi-sender application.
But even by using this application, the smartcontract required to confirm each single transaction, so the Ledger did... in a moment metamask crashed, so I guess it has this moment that tokens has been sent multiple time.
We are now fixing it
So we have identified the issue : the smartcontract could not handle multi-sender features (this we knew it), this is why we have used a multi-sender application.
But even by using this application, the smartcontract required to confirm each single transaction, so the Ledger did... in a moment metamask crashed, so I guess it has this moment that tokens has been sent multiple time.
We are now fixing it
April 02, 2019, 02:00:49 AM
No reason to worry Team already started to send new Jrt tokens ! I'm pretty certain we'll all get what we deserve soon and then patiently wait until products are launched !
Bounty was great and very well managed. To me this team is really serious and i perfectly understand such a mistake (technical, human ?) could occur ! Let's go ahead now
Team already started to send new Jrt tokens ! I'm pretty certain we'll all get what we deserve soon and then patiently wait until products are launched ! Bounty was great and very well managed. To me this team is really serious and i perfectly understand such a mistake (technical, human ?) could occur ! Let's go ahead now
No, the token distribition has not started yet and no one has recieved the new tokens. The new contract has not even created yet.
April 01, 2019, 09:48:01 PM
I hope this project is success, many ico now is scam. Make investor and bounty participant is sad. When exchange jarvis open to public ?
April 01, 2019, 04:13:09 PM
No reason to worry Team already started to send new Jrt tokens ! I'm pretty certain we'll all get what we deserve soon and then patiently wait until products are launched !
Bounty was great and very well managed. To me this team is really serious and i perfectly understand such a mistake (technical, human ?) could occur ! Let's go ahead now
Team already started to send new Jrt tokens ! I'm pretty certain we'll all get what we deserve soon and then patiently wait until products are launched ! Bounty was great and very well managed. To me this team is really serious and i perfectly understand such a mistake (technical, human ?) could occur ! Let's go ahead now
April 01, 2019, 12:30:07 PM
Some bounty hunters received their rewards others are not, but I also read that they are going to create a new contract for their token and do a swap, so if you received your rewards, you cannot sell that token, you need to wait for the new token then swap it.
Upon checking some of the bounty participant EHT address I noticed that some of them already received JRT Token which is stand for Jarvis Reward Token.
Can you give me a reason why there's only a few of bounty participant already received their bounty while the other not yet? And why they did not use their main token for distribution?
Hello,
So we still don't know what did happen.
We used Ledger Nano S, metamask and a multisender dapp for airdrop.
For an unknown reason, the Ledger ask to validate transactions thousands of time, when we realized some tokens were sent 2, 3 or 4 times we decided to stop the distribution and freeze the contract.
We will redeploy a new contract, and send the tokens next week to everyone
Finally we got news about why they are freeze our tokens and when will they are going to release the new tokens with new contract, so we have to wait and one more week to get our tokens and jarvis team really doing well and keeping going.
The mistake made in tokens distribution has caused trouble for the team and it had made me really worry. But now I am happy that they are trying their best to solve the problem.
April 01, 2019, 11:42:06 AM
Some bounty hunters received their rewards others are not, but I also read that they are going to create a new contract for their token and do a swap, so if you received your rewards, you cannot sell that token, you need to wait for the new token then swap it.
Upon checking some of the bounty participant EHT address I noticed that some of them already received JRT Token which is stand for Jarvis Reward Token.
Can you give me a reason why there's only a few of bounty participant already received their bounty while the other not yet? And why they did not use their main token for distribution?
Hello,
So we still don't know what did happen.
We used Ledger Nano S, metamask and a multisender dapp for airdrop.
For an unknown reason, the Ledger ask to validate transactions thousands of time, when we realized some tokens were sent 2, 3 or 4 times we decided to stop the distribution and freeze the contract.
We will redeploy a new contract, and send the tokens next week to everyone
If you still don't know what the problem was, you should better wait a bit before you deploy a new contract. So that you can be sure that the same issue doesn't happen again.
March 31, 2019, 09:24:48 PM
Some bounty hunters received their rewards others are not, but I also read that they are going to create a new contract for their token and do a swap, so if you received your rewards, you cannot sell that token, you need to wait for the new token then swap it.
Upon checking some of the bounty participant EHT address I noticed that some of them already received JRT Token which is stand for Jarvis Reward Token.
Can you give me a reason why there's only a few of bounty participant already received their bounty while the other not yet? And why they did not use their main token for distribution?
Hello,
So we still don't know what did happen.
We used Ledger Nano S, metamask and a multisender dapp for airdrop.
For an unknown reason, the Ledger ask to validate transactions thousands of time, when we realized some tokens were sent 2, 3 or 4 times we decided to stop the distribution and freeze the contract.
We will redeploy a new contract, and send the tokens next week to everyone
That's good explanation, I'm sure those who got their token 4 times will not be returned the tokens, so it is ok to create another token, but there could be confusion on old tokens and the new one, can you use a new ticker for this new token so there will be no confusion.
March 31, 2019, 12:13:38 PM
Some bounty hunters received their rewards others are not, but I also read that they are going to create a new contract for their token and do a swap, so if you received your rewards, you cannot sell that token, you need to wait for the new token then swap it.
Upon checking some of the bounty participant EHT address I noticed that some of them already received JRT Token which is stand for Jarvis Reward Token.
Can you give me a reason why there's only a few of bounty participant already received their bounty while the other not yet? And why they did not use their main token for distribution?
Hello,
So we still don't know what did happen.
We used Ledger Nano S, metamask and a multisender dapp for airdrop.
For an unknown reason, the Ledger ask to validate transactions thousands of time, when we realized some tokens were sent 2, 3 or 4 times we decided to stop the distribution and freeze the contract.
We will redeploy a new contract, and send the tokens next week to everyone
Finally we got news about why they are freeze our tokens and when will they are going to release the new tokens with new contract, so we have to wait and one more week to get our tokens and jarvis team really doing well and keeping going.
March 31, 2019, 12:08:46 PM
Now that ICO is closed and you have raised a fair amount what is tentative date for the exchange launch?
Hello,
We do not have plan to be listed soon
now it is time to build awesome products.So may we know when are you going to be listed?at least on a decent exchange to ensure that tokens will not be dumped. Actually it is good time to be listed while btc is pumping unless just like what other projects say "they will focus on product".
Hello,
it has been very well replied by other people here. Our vision is to not list useless tokens. Tokens are useless until there is no procduct.
You can refer to this article : https://medium.com/jarvis-edge/how-to-destroy-the-value-of-an-ico-token-list-it-before-launching-a-product-8a48e83b2f92
March 31, 2019, 12:04:07 PM
Some bounty hunters received their rewards others are not, but I also read that they are going to create a new contract for their token and do a swap, so if you received your rewards, you cannot sell that token, you need to wait for the new token then swap it.
Upon checking some of the bounty participant EHT address I noticed that some of them already received JRT Token which is stand for Jarvis Reward Token.
Can you give me a reason why there's only a few of bounty participant already received their bounty while the other not yet? And why they did not use their main token for distribution?
Hello,
So we still don't know what did happen.
We used Ledger Nano S, metamask and a multisender dapp for airdrop.
For an unknown reason, the Ledger ask to validate transactions thousands of time, when we realized some tokens were sent 2, 3 or 4 times we decided to stop the distribution and freeze the contract.
We will redeploy a new contract, and send the tokens next week to everyone
March 31, 2019, 07:22:01 AM
They say at telegram channel that they will not be listed there token as soon as possible. They will prioritize their product instead of listed their tokens. Also, the mistake of distribution looks very unprofessional. This situation should not happen if the always care.
They are considered a big project, it should not happen people are expecting too much on this project, they all thought that this is already their rewards but ends up another shitcoin in their wallet, they should double check before they implement it, this is a very long project to materialize.
Jump to: