Pages:
Author

Topic: ICO & IEO at the same time possible? - page 2. (Read 1046 times)

member
Activity: 854
Merit: 10
August 09, 2019, 06:58:58 PM
#81
Hello Bitcointalk Community,

i wondered if it is possible to do an ICO and an IEO at the same time.
...
There is no need to do that. You should choose one that will be more effective for your project, depending on your feasibility study.
These days, most projects prefer IEO, but I will suggest you do that on a good exchange, in order to attract investors.
full member
Activity: 736
Merit: 100
Adoption Blockchain e-Commerce to World
August 09, 2019, 10:35:18 AM
#80
IEO is more interested. Besides new investors can buy tokens directly in exchange, and can also be bought by investors who are on the exchange. In addition, the project you are running has been verified first by the exchange party, so it is trusted.
but I've seen a project that does a sales system with ICO and IEO. they don't do it together at one time. but they use ICO sales when private sale. then presale and mainsale they use exchanged IEO. I forgot the name of the project, but I've seen it.
I think you are talking of harmony project of Binance, harmony first conducted ico and when they realized that they might not meet up with their hardcap on ICO, they paused the project on ICO and then applied for Binance IEO which their application was granted and they had a very successful project within the shortest time they entered the exchange. I don’t think we have any project that would run the two at the same time except is for the purpose of scamming.

IEO can make a very good project launched in Binance meet up with their hardcap within a very short time because many investor now want to participate more in IEO projects than ICo project,, moist especially the one launched through Binance exchange since Binance makes research in them before accepting.

I think any project placed in this huge pump is growing. This is the principle of this trust. I think the confidence in Binance is overrated. And someone all the same will conduct IEO and steal a lot of money. But we will not guess. Of course, the reputation is the most important in the cryptocurrency market.
legendary
Activity: 2380
Merit: 1150
August 09, 2019, 10:32:00 AM
#79
IEO is more interested. Besides new investors can buy tokens directly in exchange, and can also be bought by investors who are on the exchange. In addition, the project you are running has been verified first by the exchange party, so it is trusted.
but I've seen a project that does a sales system with ICO and IEO. they don't do it together at one time. but they use ICO sales when private sale. then presale and mainsale they use exchanged IEO. I forgot the name of the project, but I've seen it.
I think you are talking of harmony project of Binance, harmony first conducted ico and when they realized that they might not meet up with their hardcap on ICO, they paused the project on ICO and then applied for Binance IEO which their application was granted and they had a very successful project within the shortest time they entered the exchange. I don’t think we have any project that would run the two at the same time except is for the purpose of scamming.

IEO can make a very good project launched in Binance meet up with their hardcap within a very short time because many investor now want to participate more in IEO projects than ICo project,, moist especially the one launched through Binance exchange since Binance makes research in them before accepting.
full member
Activity: 1316
Merit: 108
August 08, 2019, 04:04:14 PM
#78
It is possible that the developers of the project did not get the desired result from ico company and therefore used the plan B. IEO is much higher, because investors will trust the project due to the exchange rating.
full member
Activity: 941
Merit: 100
August 08, 2019, 12:36:12 PM
#77
IEO is more interested. Besides new investors can buy tokens directly in exchange, and can also be bought by investors who are on the exchange. In addition, the project you are running has been verified first by the exchange party, so it is trusted.
but I've seen a project that does a sales system with ICO and IEO. they don't do it together at one time. but they use ICO sales when private sale. then presale and mainsale they use exchanged IEO. I forgot the name of the project, but I've seen it.
full member
Activity: 854
Merit: 102
August 08, 2019, 12:32:15 PM
#76
Hello Bitcointalk Community,

i wondered if it is possible to do an ICO and an IEO at the same time?

Can i spread the total supply for fundraising and use half of it for an IEO and the other one for an ICO ?

I am looking forward to an response.


Kind Regards


Marian

IEO is more interested. Besides new investors can buy tokens directly in exchange, and can also be bought by investors who are on the exchange. In addition, the project you are running has been verified first by the exchange party, so it is trusted.
member
Activity: 574
Merit: 10
Gistcoin
July 28, 2019, 06:02:48 PM
#75
In my personal opinion, it is better for you to focus on IEO only. Focusing on only one fundraising with the certain fund will really maximize your token selling. In this case, I mean why you should spend more amounts of money to do both IEO and ICO? It is better to spend the whole money to choose the best exchange for IEO listing, right?
sr. member
Activity: 1512
Merit: 292
www.cd3d.app
July 28, 2019, 05:37:35 PM
#74
As a rule, projects choose one or the other, often abolish the ICO in favor of an IEO, by conducting a fundraising on the platform of the exchange selected by the project. It makes no sense to hold both at the same time.
hero member
Activity: 2828
Merit: 611
July 26, 2019, 12:44:07 PM
#73
I think the developer team could sell tokens with ICO and IEO simultaneously. But I think it will be more effective to use the IEO method because of the current trend. ICO and IEO simultaneously only waste huge costs.
What is the point having both together, ICO is for those that has zero capital to start with, so they can as well go for ICO and then wait for as long as they wish till they establish some sort of success in their campaign, while IEO is basically for projects that already has start up capital, because only projects that has startup capital can pay such amount of money they pay for listing on an IEO platform, but the payment is actually worth it because they tend to meet up with their hardcap within the shortest period of time.

The only issue I have with IEO is that I just feel these exchanges are exploiting more than even in ICO, because I really don’t see what they do to have been taking such amount of money to just list a project, it is the biggest scam I have ever seen in its cryptocurrency market that people are not looking into.
copper member
Activity: 2940
Merit: 1280
https://linktr.ee/crwthopia
July 25, 2019, 11:42:48 AM
#72
It depends on the Point of view of the person with investing anything. I think it could be possible, but it's not an ideal position to be in. Now that people have started knowing that ICO is mostly in the profiting kind (possible scam) you are one to Have significant balances and dump them when there are buyers. I think that's the most common thing that happens. With IEO happenings to the popular exchanges, the participants are likely to choose the most popular coin to invest, but It's just fast.

Bottom line, both are just almost the same, one is in popular exchanges, one is selling for a lower price. The common thing between them is that they are asking for money.
full member
Activity: 1120
Merit: 101
July 25, 2019, 11:32:46 AM
#71
Current ICO is not a good decision. Probably no one will join your ICO because currently 100% of people are focusing on the IEO. If your project is good and there are many investors, I think you should register for the IEO in large exchanges
it is also if the IEO registered in the exchange is trusted that is of concern to investors. for a small exchange I think it will be difficult to get investors, because many are hesitant about fighting with a not-so-busy trade.
member
Activity: 483
Merit: 10
terra-credit.com
July 25, 2019, 11:23:43 AM
#70
The fact is that today people prefer the IEO to the ICO. This is a fact where people's interest in the IEO is so great and has decreased interest in the IEO since the end of 2018 due to too many scam projects.
Agree with your opinion. that now people are no longer interested in ico's project since the many ICO projecks turned out to be scams. this has made many people prefer IEO which is really good and although not all IEOs are also good
not all, you can still see BCNEX and a number of other ICO projects that have also been successful, even if the ICO conditions are bad. indeed there are very few ICO projects that are successful now, but there are not too many production and successful IEO projects. therefore the current market growth is not so good.
sr. member
Activity: 1288
Merit: 253
casinosblockchain.io
July 25, 2019, 11:18:59 AM
#69
We know IEO is better than ICO, but if the question doing both in the same time the answers YES can but i think bad option because maybe coin which sale in ICO will not optimal

Suggest from me if want to do both, better do IEO first, for building trust.

if IEO success that's means many people already know your project so if you do ICO will have potential success too
sr. member
Activity: 882
Merit: 252
July 25, 2019, 11:13:50 AM
#68
The fact is that today people prefer the IEO to the ICO. This is a fact where people's interest in the IEO is so great and has decreased interest in the IEO since the end of 2018 due to too many scam projects.
Agree with your opinion. that now people are no longer interested in ico's project since the many ICO projecks turned out to be scams. this has made many people prefer IEO which is really good and although not all IEOs are also good
member
Activity: 378
Merit: 10
July 25, 2019, 11:10:12 AM
#67
Yes it is possible and there were enough examples. As a start, a project has launched a token sale on their own and after they mentioned that a token sale is not doing well, they launch an IEO at the same time to double their earnings.
copper member
Activity: 966
Merit: 14
July 24, 2019, 07:57:12 PM
#66
No it is not possible, you can only do one at a time; that is you can either go for IEO or ICO. As this stage, I don't think ICOs are worth it again as no team is willing to take that path rather IEO proves to a better choice.
member
Activity: 798
Merit: 10
July 24, 2019, 07:27:18 PM
#65
Hello Bitcointalk Community,

i wondered if it is possible to do an ICO and an IEO at the same time?

Can i spread the total supply for fundraising and use half of it for an IEO and the other one for an ICO ?

I am looking forward to an response.

Kind Regards

Marian

I think the developer team could sell tokens with ICO and IEO simultaneously. But I think it will be more effective to use the IEO method because of the current trend. ICO and IEO simultaneously only waste huge costs.
hero member
Activity: 1470
Merit: 509
July 24, 2019, 05:47:36 PM
#64
Yes, this is possible. But, due to uselessness, it is not needed. Sometimes some projects try additional IEOs, thinking that ICO is not the right choice. In general, ICOs have begun to decline recently and I guess we will not see them shortly after.
full member
Activity: 1904
Merit: 138
★Bitvest.io★ Play Plinko or Invest!
July 24, 2019, 05:43:27 PM
#63
It is possible for a project to run both ICOs and IEOs at the same time. Most projects only results to the other means after being unable to raise the desired amount of funds from either ICO or IEO.

And frankly, those projects that are holding both ICO and IEO are somewhat greed for the funds that they will raise. My thoughts.  Tongue They feel they can't get enough in one source of crowdfunding strategy, so why not hold these 2?
jr. member
Activity: 182
Merit: 2
July 24, 2019, 05:39:52 PM
#62
It is possible for a project to run both ICOs and IEOs at the same time. Most projects only results to the other means after being unable to raise the desired amount of funds from either ICO or IEO.
Pages:
Jump to: