Topic: ICO or STO or SAFT? What's the safest bet? - page 3. (Read 550 times)
I only know about the ICO, IPO and IEO but the rest is new to me. Crowdfunding is not new anymore, its already here in the market for a decade or more now and some project succeed on that. There’s no safest thing to do that, all have their own risk and there are times that investors don’t want the project. I will go for these three because i already experience their success.
So are you looking for safe or for ROI? price rise in this market is affected by hype and rumor, so anything that have it will have good return.
Safe project if they are already established good company looking for expanding their company, as good idea alone can't guarantee
Safe project if they are already established good company looking for expanding their company, as good idea alone can't guarantee
First time I hear about SAFT. This must be something new. In fact, developments on this issue continue without stopping. IEO is also new in this regard. How everyone affected by binance in the bear market by means of IEO, everyone is looking for it.
It seems people nowadays don't even get themselves into ICO's anymore because of the lack of hype and shady projects surfacing. Now there is always something new under the table like STOs, or ILP's, and now SAFTs. Giant companies like Bitmain and Telegram used IPOs to raise funds, Kodak used a SAFT, and other large blockchain based businesses used ICOs. What is the safest bet and how can you guarantee a positive ROI going thru these crowdfunding platforms? I have a hat that says 'Make ICO's Great Again' even tho that's definitely not possible.
"With an ICO the founders of a crypto startup could raise money without diluting their own shares in the company.
The problem with ICOs is that literally anyone with a whitepaper, a slick-looking website, and an idea could launch one and begin raising funds.
A damning study
by ICO advisory firm States Group concluded that around 80 percent of ICOs carried out in 2017 were complete scams.
Throw in confusion over governmental regulation, with regulators themselves admitting that ICOs can begin life as a security and transform into another asset type down the line, and it’s easy to see why the ICO craze has quickly dropped off."
Photo and quote source: https://southafricatoday.net/cryptocurrency/saft-vs-ico-which-approach-is-better-in-2019/
"With an ICO the founders of a crypto startup could raise money without diluting their own shares in the company.
The problem with ICOs is that literally anyone with a whitepaper, a slick-looking website, and an idea could launch one and begin raising funds.
A damning study
by ICO advisory firm States Group concluded that around 80 percent of ICOs carried out in 2017 were complete scams.
Throw in confusion over governmental regulation, with regulators themselves admitting that ICOs can begin life as a security and transform into another asset type down the line, and it’s easy to see why the ICO craze has quickly dropped off."
Sub-question: whatever crowdfunding idea you voted for, why did you vote for it?
Photo and quote source: https://southafricatoday.net/cryptocurrency/saft-vs-ico-which-approach-is-better-in-2019/
Jump to: