It because many factor that can make it dump, especially from airdrop and bounty hunter just sell it without know about that project, they just sell it and earn some money.
there is no other way than to sell it, because no one believes that the ICO price will return. IIC's price is only an advertisement for investors to be interested in, and after that they spend it far from the ICO price. Bounty hunters just think of making money quickly and projects are not their priority. 
Topic: ICO price and Listing price - page 3. (Read 668 times)
interesting topic,,firstly it all do with some coins,,their are some coinsthat have neither valve nor potential,,so during their ico the prices will be huge in other to have many participant that will involve in or some investor may even wanted to invest because of the ico they see,,so after through with their project the prices will fall ten times of ico,,so it depends on project
No they are getting this thing wrong I don't think bounty hunters and airdropers are the one crashing the price but I see it that most of this new tokens or coins have nothing new to offer so nothing important about it and most time too developers / team do dump.
infact i so much like this topic,,firstly i dont know what is wrong with some project,,during their project you are going to see good and entizing ico prices,,maybe i will suggest that they are just making this to lure peoplr so they can work for them or i dont know,,,it was after their listing on exchange the prices will now depreciate ten times of their ico,,,i wonder why they are making such a things to happen,,what will now be the gain of those they invest in such coin
Bonus, airdrop, bounty will reduce the value of ico project tokens already on the exchange. But if we are patient, the value of the coin will recover if the market recovers.
It's annoying when all the bounty hunters go on telegram and keep asking when it will list on an exchange, don't see much asking about the ICO price, those are the ones that will dump at any price. Hard to avoid those guys, i think they are the social media bounties who apply for everything
Those are their coins, they can do whatever they want with their coins, in my opinion the reason of why many coins go below the ico price is simply that the coins are very overvalued, the developers put a price to their coins independently from the will of the market so it's natural that the price crashes after is listed in an exchange, I have seen projects that let the market decide what was going to be its ico price and it's obvious those coins never crashed.
I do not think that bounty hunters are able to collapse the price, this is confirmed by the fact that prices often fall much earlier than the payments reach to bounty hunters. It seems to me that prices are falling against the background of the overall market position and directly because of the ICOs product itself.
the price after ico naturally goes down. growth is worth waiting for after those who bought on pre-sale
It's annoying when all the bounty hunters go on telegram and keep asking when it will list on an exchange, don't see much asking about the ICO price, those are the ones that will dump at any price. Hard to avoid those guys, i think they are the social media bounties who apply for everything
Almost half of the projects who started an Initial Coin Offering (ICO) didn’t have any development work done prior to the fundraising event, research shows. The majority of projects which got listed on a cryptocurrency exchange traded below the ICO price. I think the listing price most time goes lower than ico price
If the bounty has a fixed predetermined percentage for the bounty and the project does not sell so many tokens and therefore this percentage is impacting the total number of tokens sold, we can find ourselves in a situation in which the bounty hunters actually can affect the market for the coin, but this is difficult to come by often when you reach the soft cap and the number of tokens for the hunters is too high, this number is reduced drastically to avoid the dump.
But this rarely happens, the initial dump is usually done by the whales that they buy with a big initial bonus, careless of the project for pure profit and selling soon after when coin hit exchange.
But this rarely happens, the initial dump is usually done by the whales that they buy with a big initial bonus, careless of the project for pure profit and selling soon after when coin hit exchange.
They dont care about it because they are anyways in the profits because they have gotten the tokens from the bounties as part of reward system. If they are calling themselves bounty hunters then they surely get themselves involved into various bounties at the same time and thus they just care about how much money they are getting from it each time. Even with small amount of money they have gotten they will just go on selling as they have chance to grab these small amounts from huge number of different bounties that they are entering into. 
2018 has been an year of low price which caused ICO price stay either stable or below its price. Too much lose to the investors.
Tokens are released to the stock exchanges at a fixed price, which was at the ICO. After all, users themselves artificially create demand, which entails a decrease or increase in price. The project does not have the authority to fix a fixed price on the exchange.
Do you really think bounty hunters care about what the ICO price was? They know that if they don't sell out quick, some other bounty hunter will come along and sell their tokens for less. This mentality leads to hundreds of bounty hunters dumping their tokens lower than the previous guy. If there isn't enough market demand to soak those tokens up, this lead to the market crashing.
The best way to fix this is to lock bounty payments for 6 months to a year, or release them gradually so there's a consistent flow to exchanges.
That is never going to work, it seems that you forgot that most icos disappear after just a few months or a year, a bounty hunter that knows that information is never going to promote an ico that forces him to hold his coins for a year, so an ico trying to implement such a system will simply fail since they will never find enough people to promote it while all the icos that do not implement that strategy get all the promotion.The best way to fix this is to lock bounty payments for 6 months to a year, or release them gradually so there's a consistent flow to exchanges.
If the project is really profitable and good this would not be a problem. Bounty hunters hold only the smallest percentage in the whole pool. If a project dumps with small movement then maybe it is not yet ready to be traded.
Should have locked the token to protect investors and even holders like hunters. (I mean they will be forced to hold because it is locked)
Should have locked the token to protect investors and even holders like hunters. (I mean they will be forced to hold because it is locked)
There is a fact that the two prices are determined in a very different situation. Of course, quality projects are more profitable, but if you need to talk about price determination, there are two fixed prices for each project. The ICO price is unfortunately not determined by the supply-demand balance, which is the price determined by the project team at the end of the ICO. But the listing price on the stock exchange does not come up this way and therefore we face both positive and negative prices. When ICO projects begin trading on the stock market, this time the price is completely determined by supply-demand balance and transaction volume. So this time, not the project team, the investor has determined the price. Although the real market is operating in this way, ICO projects are a must.
Actually i don not think the problem here is the airdrop and bounty hunters. The main issue here is ICO's being truthful, Today they say that ICO price is $0.4 and later they list x2 below the promised ICO price. As for the bounty hunter. a hunter is one who works for a project by promoting it and expect his or her reward. and this reward depends on the ICO price
I think every project done with their ico and listing on exchanges need to remember the holders the last stage price of their ice.
I observed that most investors complain about airdrop and bounty hunters, that they're the ones who dump the price always.
I think when the project team are about to announce the listing of their project on a particular exchange, if on twitter and Telegram they should attach a sentence like "Remember our ico price is $0.5"
I noticed that most airdrop and bounty hunters don't bother to know what the ico price was all they need is making something out of it.
What do you think guys?
I think it's not effective to avoid dump but it doesn't hurt to try, dump is not a mistake from bounty hunters or investors but it is a consequence for ICO projects that can't convince their community to hold their tokens, it's not easy but in fact there are many projects that can establish good relations with their communities and their tokens are not dumped when have debuted on the exchange I observed that most investors complain about airdrop and bounty hunters, that they're the ones who dump the price always.
I think when the project team are about to announce the listing of their project on a particular exchange, if on twitter and Telegram they should attach a sentence like "Remember our ico price is $0.5"
I noticed that most airdrop and bounty hunters don't bother to know what the ico price was all they need is making something out of it.
What do you think guys?
Recently, there was a trend that many projects after entering the exchange received a sharp drop in the price of their token. But it seems to me that this trend will not last long. This was all due to the fact that recently there was a bear market.
Jump to: