Topic: ICOEthics is a Scammer (Read 387 times)

Moderators won't even answer my dms, fuck 'em. Don't care. This forum is pointless. Logging out and not logging in again. peace

This is a big joke on this section, just because ICOethics posted that your project is a scam you retaliate by calling him scam when he is not asking for money or has a project like yours that ask for funds, you are one big idiot in this forum, your project is doom even if it is not yet starting.

And this will get deleted too. You can't even be bothered to read the rules but you're throwing accusations around and attacking moderators

I'm more calm after yesterday's dealings. Listen man, I'm not going to war over this...whatever, I've learned that the Bitcointalk forum doesn't matter as much. I'm not going to litigate every single matter. A scam is a scam, an attempt to steal money, when in-fact I've poured blood, sweat and tears into a project. PiedPiperCoin is a fictitious idea that I am trying to make real. I've already spoken to Silicon Valley, yes the hbo show about the matter and all they asked us to do is not use their trademark material, which we do not anymore....that was only in the first couple days of launching the project so over a year ago, and they asked us to have a disclaimer saying we are not affiliated with HBO which we have on the twitter bio.

Anyways I'm done fighting the matter. This is exhausting.

In any case I removed my feedback on you as a gesture of good faith...and I'm just tired of it all quite frankly

I would like to advise, just locked this thread and go away. Because you are highlighting yourself. You haven't provided any proof aginst ICOEthics on OP. Perhaps more DT will draw attention your thread and you might get more red tag although I will not leave retailonary feedback to you for this thread. I follow ICOEthics from beginning and I didn't found anything suspicious. So don't make false and retailonary accusation.

Falsely accusing you of scamming doesn't make the person on the other end as a scammer. You still have time to lock this thread and sort your stuff out with them in that thread or via personal messages. Retaliation will result in more negative feedbacks which will never be revised.

This is exactly what I told them on the original scam accusation thread :


Is it the dog waiving his tail, or the tail waving the dog ?
What should happen ?

Should PiedPiperCoin (here) show they are made of good faith by their actions and effort to brush what looks alike between their project and the fictitious "Pier Piper Coin" in the TV show, so we remove the warnings ?
Or should we remove the warnings and trust them to do whatever they say they will do.

Sorry, I don't trust you. I bet that if we remove the feedbacks you won't try to improve your project, at least make it more distinct from the serie.

---

You are still advertising your coin on twitter linked to pictures of the show. This is a very scammy attempt to confuse visitors in thinking they are buying something that comes from HBO.

In the first place, the idea of this project is stupid.

Trying to overtake some kind of hype to profit from it is a terrible idea.
Trying to rip-off and profit off other's people work is even worse.

Even the damn color of your logo is the same color that's used by the Pied Piper in the show !
How far do you want to plagiarize ?

Show that you have made it very clearly very distinct, and then maybe, only maybe (given that you resorted to leave false retaliatory neg feedbacks) I'll think of removing mine.

---

The name was a terrible idea, posting pics of actors in your project twitter is a terrible idea, coingecko listing the team of actors as team of developers for your coins is terrible. The HBO website showing a "Pied Piper Coin" price ticker is awful since when people will try to buy some, they'll end up buying your fake project.

Most interesting thing is that you don't know the exact definition of scammer. I think you are so much worried about your negative feedback's but it is to notify you that this kind of activities isn't gonna reduce that dude. Anyone can take their decision easily after having a visit on your project and its really surprising to see that you are calling ICOEthics a scammer.

You should find other ways to disclose your matter rather than throwing claim to someone without proper reason.

@PPC it's too bad how you react really since it is pretty obvious your "project" is a joke.

ICOEthics might have been quite overzealous here.

Maybe take your retaliatory accusations down and ask them again nicely to reconsider their feedback. Mistakes happen, to everyone.

Yeah I'm not a scammer obviously either but he wants to be an idiot and still continue then I might as well. What else should I do, lay down and die...whatever if I get run off the forum I get ran off. Not the end of the world. I'm not going to stop until he corrects his mistake. Until he does I have to assume he is intentionally and maliciously doing so. That kind of behavior is characteristic of a scammer.

You should have listened to my advice to sort your shit out before complaining about your neg trust. If you keep doing what you're doing you'll just end up with more red trust. ICOEthics is not a scammer and your scam accusation is obviously frivolous.

He piled on and left negative feedback in light of the evidence. He made the first move against my reputation...I'll happily remove my feedback once he does the same.

Is yogg a scammer too?

...and calling out people low iq pleb is going to help you exactly how?

Reasons enclosed in these threads:

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.51374061

Some good posts here that clarify his false accusation and he still leaves it up.

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/piedpipercoin-scam-fake-team-impersonating-real-wwwpiedpipercom-4981427

My message is beware of this guy, if you piss him off he will try to ruin you with fake smears. I wouldn't trust a word he says.