Pages:
Author

Topic: Idea 4 lost bitcoin problems (Read 2157 times)

newbie
Activity: 41
Merit: 0
June 22, 2013, 10:13:39 AM
#25
I get that people think its just my stupidity but that wasn't the question I was asking.
To me I love bitcoin, and I would like to see it go much more main stream than it is.
After this situation I saw an opportunity for an optional service that if used, could in my opinion, solidify bitcoin even further and help it go more mainstream.

My question was if my solution is not feasible, what things could be done to help bitcoin become more solid, and would a method of recourse be one of those things?


And for those who do not believe..  See excerpt from the email I got from them.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Our Management team made decision to remove BitCoin from payment methods.
 
Some of the reasons are:
- Complicated administration in XXXXXXXX, which cause more costs then profit over this currency.  
- Risk of similar scenario like with Liberty Reserve, where we lost few thousands.
 
From now on, we accept following methods:
 
- Visa / Master Card
- Bank Transfer / Wire
- WebMoney
- Payza
- PayPal
 
We plan adding some extra payment methods, however, we won't focus on adding LR/BTC similar payment methods, but the methods who really can do safe business for us as a company and you as our clients.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The fact is Bitcoin is too volatile for mainstream use as it sits right now.  
Which good or bad seems to be how most of the people in this thread like it.  

Thanks for those who gave their opinions.. and ideas..



sr. member
Activity: 294
Merit: 250
Let's Start a Cryptolution!!
June 20, 2013, 09:19:50 PM
#24
I always thought about going through old computers for bitcoins that people may have forgotton about years ago. I think it is an extremely interesting concept!!
Eri
sr. member
Activity: 264
Merit: 250
June 20, 2013, 08:00:37 PM
#23
It sucks, but this is surely not your fault. if they gave you an incorrect address to send the payment to then its their fault, not yours. Im sure they started using bitcoin because they liked the idea that it could be reversed, ie. someone pays for their service then 3 months later ... charge back.

It seems to me they liked bitcoin untill they didnt use it properly and lost some money. The result is squarely their responsibility. you in no way owe them another payment. You should request the payment back if they charged you twice, or have them double the length of the service the payment would have bought you. Its a matter of 'good business'. If they cant do that i think you should post the companies website and name.

Can we put their company in the scammer section? (they received payment, withheld service, demanding another payment).
edd
donator
Activity: 1414
Merit: 1002
June 20, 2013, 07:54:09 PM
#22
Quote
I know if this was a service that a wallet provided I would definitely pay a little extra on all transactions I am not sure of.  Maybe a payment insurance or something like that.

And in the instance mentioned above, it was a hosting provider and now no longer takes bitcoins because of this lack of recourse. Its ended up being a lose lose.. I lost my coins I sent as a payment, and still had to pay for hosting using an other method.

Would anyone else pay a small fee to have deliver insurance or confirmation on it?  So if this happens you could get your payment back.. There has to be something a wallet company could add..

I dont see this happening. Theres not a need for it because if a transaction is sent to an address it would arrive..

This. The problems experienced by the OP weren't caused by Bitcoin, they were due to human failings. Asking to implement features that safeguard users against stupid mistakes is pointless. The code shouldn't have to babysit everyone due to the carelessness of a few.
full member
Activity: 182
Merit: 100
June 20, 2013, 07:17:20 PM
#21
Bitcoins arent lost, they're value is just gained by everyone else!
hero member
Activity: 532
Merit: 500
June 20, 2013, 06:39:12 PM
#20
Quote
I know if this was a service that a wallet provided I would definitely pay a little extra on all transactions I am not sure of.  Maybe a payment insurance or something like that.

And in the instance mentioned above, it was a hosting provider and now no longer takes bitcoins because of this lack of recourse. Its ended up being a lose lose.. I lost my coins I sent as a payment, and still had to pay for hosting using an other method.

Would anyone else pay a small fee to have deliver insurance or confirmation on it?  So if this happens you could get your payment back.. There has to be something a wallet company could add..

I dont see this happening. Theres not a need for it because if a transaction is sent to an address it would arrive..
sr. member
Activity: 260
Merit: 250
June 20, 2013, 03:15:46 PM
#19
And in the instance mentioned above, it was a hosting provider and now no longer takes bitcoins because of this lack of recourse. Its ended up being a lose lose.. I lost my coins I sent as a payment, and still had to pay for hosting using an other method.
They stopped accepting bitcoins for payment - well okay, that's their choice.  But then they immediately threw away the private key to their address??  At best that is lame on their part.  But more likely it seems doubtful.  Have you tracked their address to see if there are transactions going out of it after your payment?

I know that you'll probably not get the money back from them since you don't really have much leverage, but it seems that they owe you a refund for the double payment.  I mean the nature of bitcoin is that once the payment is sent the money belongs to the payee.  If they lost it after you paid that is an operational problem on their part and they didn't really have any business asking you to pay again.
legendary
Activity: 1372
Merit: 1008
1davout
June 20, 2013, 03:14:15 PM
#18
Because it has happened to me twice now.
That's not a problem with Bitcoin, it's a problem with you.
cp1
hero member
Activity: 616
Merit: 500
Stop using branwallets
June 20, 2013, 03:12:31 PM
#17
Try using escrow, double check your addresses, and read up about sites you use.
newbie
Activity: 41
Merit: 0
June 20, 2013, 03:10:36 PM
#16
what makes you think lost btc are a problem?


Because it has happened to me twice now.

1 time to a hosting company, and a second time to a scam site where I thought I was sending the funds to be exchanged..

I know the anonymity of bitcoin is one of the more attractive benefits of transacting in bitcoin, however  if there was a service i could pay for that insured my payment I would gladly pay it.. Maybe i am the only one who thinks this way..
hero member
Activity: 532
Merit: 500
June 20, 2013, 03:08:10 PM
#15
Yea, I dont think lost btc is a problem at all, just makes btc more valuable.
legendary
Activity: 1372
Merit: 1008
1davout
June 20, 2013, 02:50:05 PM
#14
what makes you think lost btc are a problem?
newbie
Activity: 41
Merit: 0
June 20, 2013, 02:48:47 PM
#13
I know if this was a service that a wallet provided I would definitely pay a little extra on all transactions I am not sure of.  Maybe a payment insurance or something like that.

And in the instance mentioned above, it was a hosting provider and now no longer takes bitcoins because of this lack of recourse. Its ended up being a lose lose.. I lost my coins I sent as a payment, and still had to pay for hosting using an other method.

Would anyone else pay a small fee to have deliver insurance or confirmation on it?  So if this happens you could get your payment back.. There has to be something a wallet company could add..
full member
Activity: 196
Merit: 100
June 20, 2013, 04:45:16 AM
#12
NO, I am saying if it was not accepted within 72 hours, and would only apply if someone wanted to pay the fee for it..

I don't know the right answer, I do know that there is no recourse right now if that happens.. And I feel something with recourse could help bitcoin go more mainstream..  Maybe a charge back model like credit cards or something would be better I don't know.. Just an idea..

BTC having, "no recourse," creates an entirely new sort of transfer of value system.  It has different abilities (some that make it more powerful), then our traditional models of value transfer.  People want to mold it into what they know which is what they're comfortable with.

In the instance you gave, I assume that the party sending the btc had already received value from the party receiving the btc.  If the btc are lost it is a problem with the seller of value not the seller of btc.  The agreement is good, why do you care to get your btc back.

This sort of feature could occur in 3rd party escrow services, and maybe once high bred multi sig can be levered (will still need 3rd party), but I don't believe it would ever be part of the main protocol.

Good luck!

Agree with this opinion.

I don't think it should be a part of the main protocol, but it could be a good idea for the basis of a second layer. This layer fixing all the problems such as transaction time etc....a trusted 3rd party
legendary
Activity: 1316
Merit: 1000
Varanida : Fair & Transparent Digital Ecosystem
June 20, 2013, 04:05:10 AM
#11
If we give every stoshidice a unique number, then we can track its activities, would this help to your opinions?
full member
Activity: 168
Merit: 100
June 20, 2013, 12:47:51 AM
#10
But then you couldn't send them to offline storage -- you'd need to have your wallet client open all the time.

This - it doesn't matter if a client is on or off, the user on vacation, etc.
I don't want to have to confirm receipt and when sending large amounts I assume the standard protocol is to send a small amount first and ask if they got it before sending the rest.

-=-
Your friend should have a backup of his old wallet. Sorry but that's his problem.
cp1
hero member
Activity: 616
Merit: 500
Stop using branwallets
June 20, 2013, 12:00:30 AM
#9
But then you couldn't send them to offline storage -- you'd need to have your wallet client open all the time.
legendary
Activity: 1330
Merit: 1000
Bitcoin
June 19, 2013, 11:52:40 PM
#8
.
member
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
June 19, 2013, 10:21:42 PM
#7
The problem is easy, you use a merchant service like BitPay or anyone else who has this sort of system designed.

Bitcoin by default needs to stay simple and clean. If you aren't a tech geek you shouldn't be using the default client.
hero member
Activity: 532
Merit: 500
June 19, 2013, 09:32:42 PM
#6
Interesting theory, but I dont see this ever happening. Lost bitcoins dont harm the bitcoin economy in any way, they actually make bitcoins more valuable.
Pages:
Jump to: