I think many of us are procrastinators. We've got a bunch of time to watch nonsense content on the internet and it's just all about entertainment and having fun. But when we put time into what we should be dedicated to which could be a life-changing career or opportunity for that skill we're mastering, we've got not that much plenty of time to spend. We've got plenty of dreams but we don't start it out when it's necessary and we're doing it when we think that we're failing in other things that we do. So we jump to the conclusion that we should start this and that for our own benefit. Despite that, we're still procrastinating at some point in our lives when we need to do so. That's why many are looking for motivations just for them to initiate.
This happens because being lazy is easier, in fact of all the human flaws that exist laziness is probably the easiest in which a person can fall, and this is because literally in order to be lazy you need to do nothing, when you think about other character flaws like extreme greediness, at least the greedy person needs to do something in order to achieve their dreams of riches, and many people will admire them because of the results they achieved, so at least there is something to admire from those people, but when it comes to laziness I do not see any positive point you could find that results from that flaw.
Was that laziness? In our busy modern economy, it's an interesting flaw to study. Laziness, in its purest form, demands nothing, requires nothing, and yields nothing, doesn’t it? This emptiness, this non-action, makes it easy and dangerous. Can doing nothing be easy?
Laziness is more than inaction in our fast-paced economy, where everyone contributes to productivity and progress. Disengagement from society's progress is it. Greed, however, motivates, inspires, and increases economic activity through self-interest. Does the greedy contribute something admirable, or are we just respecting their results?
While seemingly opposed, laziness and greed provide intriguing issues in human psychology and economic functionality. Both problems affect our economic structures differently, right?