Identity of Satoshi Nakamoto is known - page 2.

Etlase2

hero member

Activity: 798

Merit: 1000

Quote from: charleshoskinson on May 19, 2013, 07:50:03 PM

Ok people, just ignore the guy who actually met the person you're speculating about. I'm out. This thread's a blackhole

I am guessing the real Satoshi has met other people in real life. I am guessing the vast majority of those people do not know he is Satoshi.

BitcoinFX

legendary

Activity: 2646

Merit: 1720

https://youtu.be/DsAVx0u9Cw4 ... Dr. WHO < KLF

Shinichi Mochizuki is a very unlikely candidate in my honest opinion. Here's my theory...

Yossi Nagy Moti - sound familiar to anyone ?

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/yossi-nagy-moti-cryptovirology-and-bitcoin-206630

alkuluku

member

Activity: 110

Merit: 10

🙏

Quote from: LAMarcellus on May 20, 2013, 12:59:07 AM

Quote from: ildubbioso on May 18, 2013, 08:53:09 PM

Quote from: solex on May 18, 2013, 08:30:44 PM

If you want a pic too..

He looks like "my" Satoshi Nakamoto

lol
All "Satoshis" look the same to me.

This one looks like the Asian version of Bruce Campbell.

LAMarcellus

full member

Activity: 180

Merit: 100

Quote from: ildubbioso on May 18, 2013, 08:53:09 PM

Quote from: solex on May 18, 2013, 08:30:44 PM

If you want a pic too..

He looks like "my" Satoshi Nakamoto

lol
All "Satoshis" look the same to me.

FoBoT

sr. member

Activity: 658

Merit: 250

lixiaolai

vip

Activity: 169

Merit: 100

irrelevant.

richie88

newbie

Activity: 16

Merit: 0

Close enough.

Littleshop

legendary

Activity: 1386

Merit: 1003

Quote from: QuantPlus on May 19, 2013, 04:23:10 PM

Not to mention business experience to structure a First Adopter Ponzi scheme.

For meanings of "Ponzi scheme" that are incorrect. Go to a dictionary and look ok Ponzi. Bitcoin does not even resemble a Ponzi scheme.

charleshoskinson

legendary

Activity: 1134

Merit: 1008

CEO of IOHK

Ok people, just ignore the guy who actually met the person you're speculating about. I'm out. This thread's a blackhole

aceking

full member

Activity: 229

Merit: 100

every day the same question , who cares ?

Littleshop

legendary

Activity: 1386

Merit: 1003

Quote from: noedaRDH on May 19, 2013, 06:53:19 PM

Quote from: chsados on May 18, 2013, 08:39:54 PM

This guy apparently has zero programming experience.

Who said he actually wrote the program? He might have worked with a couple of other people to make Bitcoin.

Might? He is not Satoshi. Satoshi may be more than one person of course.

rm187

member

Activity: 65

Merit: 10

Quote from: chsados on May 18, 2013, 08:39:54 PM

This guy apparently has zero programming experience.

Why would he need it? A person like this could read {insertLanguage} in 21 days! and actually understand everything and then some. Not to mention, programming is just very elegant math, and Bitcoin is primarily just a type of mathematical construct, programming only gets hard when you trying to recreate the representation of the world we understand physically.

noedaRDH

full member

Activity: 182

Merit: 100

Finding Satoshi

Quote from: chsados on May 18, 2013, 08:39:54 PM

This guy apparently has zero programming experience.

Who said he actually wrote the program? He might have worked with a couple of other people to make Bitcoin.

charleshoskinson

legendary

Activity: 1134

Merit: 1008

CEO of IOHK

As probably the only forum member to have actually met Shinichi Mochizuki, I can assure you that he isn't Satoshi. Shinichi is a genius without bounds as evident by his work on the ABC conjecture; however, he seems far more interested in Teichmüller theory than monetary policy. Number theorists don't instantly make good cryptographers. Now if someone asserted Satoshi is Wenbo Mao or Dan Boneh, I'd be far more inclined to believe them.

CasinoBit

sr. member

Activity: 364

Merit: 250

Quote from: jjdub7 on May 19, 2013, 06:01:27 PM

OP is a sensationalist. Nothing is known until you find proof. What a let-down.

I was kidding, kinda disappointing that you did not detect it straight away.

jjdub7

hero member

Activity: 938

Merit: 502

OP is a sensationalist. Nothing is known until you find proof. What a let-down.

CasinoBit

sr. member

Activity: 364

Merit: 250

Quote from: DPoS on May 19, 2013, 04:55:56 PM

My guess is it's Grigori !!!

http://www.kokeytechnology.com/internet-news/russian-mathematician-rejects-1-million-dollar-prize-reward-for-solving-a-hundred-year-old-math-problem/

Lol, guess we didn't realize just how many amazing people just don't want the credit.

DPoS

sr. member

Activity: 462

Merit: 250

My guess is it's Grigori !!!

http://www.kokeytechnology.com/internet-news/russian-mathematician-rejects-1-million-dollar-prize-reward-for-solving-a-hundred-year-old-math-problem/

QuantPlus

sr. member

Activity: 280

Merit: 250

Quote from: bitjoint on May 18, 2013, 09:39:07 PM

Quote from: chsados on May 18, 2013, 08:39:54 PM

This guy apparently has zero programming experience.

Are you sure? Apparently he actually does know c++...

The Fast Company piece got this part right:

"Nakamoto would have to be "a world-class programmer"
with "a deep understanding" of C++ the programming language
and an extensive background in cryptography, economics,
and peer-to-peer networking."

"Knows C++" is a million miles from "world-class programmer"...
Which requires a 5-10 year obsession...
Plus all of the other expertise listed...
Not to mention business experience to structure a First Adopter Ponzi scheme.

But I'm sure if Nakamoto exists... he is 35-45.

CasinoBit

sr. member

Activity: 364

Merit: 250

Quote from: franky1 on May 19, 2013, 02:05:38 AM

Quote from: chsados on May 18, 2013, 11:02:36 PM

Check out "Satoshi's" website... very professional! No it's probably just a guise, right?

my 7am tinfoil hat moment.
maybe mochizuki didnt write bitcoin. maybe a robot twin did

ok that was for laughs, but seriously lets move this mochizuki myth to the speculation or trash thread.

Lewl.

Topic: Identity of Satoshi Nakamoto is known - page 2. (Read 10557 times)