that was just the justification for the bill. even gold coins that are legal tender (with a face value) were affected.
Topic: If Bitcoin is made illegal... (Read 3436 times)
There's really no precedent for any currency being "made illegal"
hello?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Executive_Order_6102
Fair enough, though it applied to gold more as an asset than a currency.
There's really no precedent for any currency being "made illegal"
hello?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Executive_Order_6102
Yup, another reason to keep some wealth "offshore", even (or especially) in bitcoins.
Or people think the US Govt will be this nice forever?
There's really no precedent for any currency being "made illegal"
hello?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Executive_Order_6102
and who is 'They' anyway. Bilderburg?
Barack Obama and his liberal Bitcoin destroying democratic watchdogs.
I don't see why they would ban it. Because some people use it to sell drugs? How many drug deals are closed in dollars?
There's really no precedent for any currency being "made illegal".
There is... in China, but I guess that doesn't count.
There's really no precedent for any currency being "made illegal" nor is there any real push by any government to do so. Even the two senators (who are, TWO senators) who didn't like Silkroad didn't make any statements that they intended to create any sort of anti-bitcoin laws. The ability to criminalize possession, use or acceptance of a currency would be a massive expansion of government powers, which admittedly hasn't stopped the federal government in the past, would nonetheless be extremely unpopular with the current anti-big-government Teaparty lean of the populace. I don't think anything's happening to the legality of bitcoins themselves for many years.
This is what's going to happen if government goes down that road:
1. Bitcoin client is made illegal. People create alternative clients.
2. Bitcoin protocol is made illegal. People start new block chains with slightly modified protocols.
3. ALL "crypocurrencies" are made illegal. People start using Namecoin as a currency.
4. Namecoin is made illegal. People start using other BitX projects as currencies.
5. ALL technologies that use a proof-of-work block chain are made illegal, even if they are not designed to be currencies. People start using other digital commodities that are not based on proof of work blockchains, such as Ripple or OpenTransactions.
6. ALL techologies that could potentially be used as a digital currency are made illegal. This legislation would be so overarching that it would include stuff like WoW and Facebook.
7. Country loses competitive edge against countries that don't impose draconian restrictions on innovation.
1. Bitcoin client is made illegal. People create alternative clients.
2. Bitcoin protocol is made illegal. People start new block chains with slightly modified protocols.
3. ALL "crypocurrencies" are made illegal. People start using Namecoin as a currency.
4. Namecoin is made illegal. People start using other BitX projects as currencies.
5. ALL technologies that use a proof-of-work block chain are made illegal, even if they are not designed to be currencies. People start using other digital commodities that are not based on proof of work blockchains, such as Ripple or OpenTransactions.
6. ALL techologies that could potentially be used as a digital currency are made illegal. This legislation would be so overarching that it would include stuff like WoW and Facebook.
7. Country loses competitive edge against countries that don't impose draconian restrictions on innovation.
AMEN!
This is what's going to happen if government goes down that road:
1. Bitcoin client is made illegal. People create alternative clients.
2. Bitcoin protocol is made illegal. People start new block chains with slightly modified protocols.
3. ALL "crypocurrencies" are made illegal. People start using Namecoin as a currency.
4. Namecoin is made illegal. People start using other BitX projects as currencies.
5. ALL technologies that use a proof-of-work block chain are made illegal, even if they are not designed to be currencies. People start using other digital commodities that are not based on proof of work blockchains, such as Ripple or OpenTransactions.
6. ALL techologies that could potentially be used as a digital currency are made illegal. This legislation would be so overarching that it would destroy stuff like WoW and Facebook.
7. Country loses competitive edge against countries that don't impose draconian restrictions on innovation.
1. Bitcoin client is made illegal. People create alternative clients.
2. Bitcoin protocol is made illegal. People start new block chains with slightly modified protocols.
3. ALL "crypocurrencies" are made illegal. People start using Namecoin as a currency.
4. Namecoin is made illegal. People start using other BitX projects as currencies.
5. ALL technologies that use a proof-of-work block chain are made illegal, even if they are not designed to be currencies. People start using other digital commodities that are not based on proof of work blockchains, such as Ripple or OpenTransactions.
6. ALL techologies that could potentially be used as a digital currency are made illegal. This legislation would be so overarching that it would destroy stuff like WoW and Facebook.
7. Country loses competitive edge against countries that don't impose draconian restrictions on innovation.
Criminalising Bitcoin won't stop criminals from using it.
It will only stop honest people from using it.
Then we are going to live in a world where, de facto, financial privacy and free trade is a priviledge enjoyed only by criminals, but not by honest people.
This will make criminals wealthier and more powerful than they would have been in a world where bitcoin was legal.
Somebody should explain this to these politicians.
It will only stop honest people from using it.
Then we are going to live in a world where, de facto, financial privacy and free trade is a priviledge enjoyed only by criminals, but not by honest people.
This will make criminals wealthier and more powerful than they would have been in a world where bitcoin was legal.
Somebody should explain this to these politicians.
The world is not just the USA. Bitcoin is global. It will only hurt the US if they make it illegal, I think. Some other country will pick up the slack in reduced bitcoin activity.
Don't underestimate the desire (or ability) of the US government to control the world.
Don't overestimate the ability of the US government to control the world. As we could see, the Playstation Network had to go offline in order for them to find Bin Laden.
...it will thrive regardless. Think about it. If it is made illegal, then sure, you won't be able to use Bitcoins to buy products from Amazon anytime soon, but the black market is HUGE. Think of all the drug lords who would benefit from anonymous (via Tor), instantaneous transactions, let alone the benefits of Silk Road. Many of you may not be interested in drug purchases, but we are all interested in the value of our bitcoins. The price of bitcoins will skyrocket once these major players get involved, and then it will only be a matter of time before non-black market products can be bought as well.
Once the lollerdollar collapses (and potentially other world currencies), I can see confidence in governments dropping significantly, opening the door for businesses dealing in consumer products, food, everyday items, etc., to start accepting bitcoins regardless of government laws.
I think we all know why Bitcoin has been hung up around $18-19 for as long as it has. It's the fear of governments making it illegal. Am I the only one who thinks that this is irrelevant?
Once the lollerdollar collapses (and potentially other world currencies), I can see confidence in governments dropping significantly, opening the door for businesses dealing in consumer products, food, everyday items, etc., to start accepting bitcoins regardless of government laws.
I think we all know why Bitcoin has been hung up around $18-19 for as long as it has. It's the fear of governments making it illegal. Am I the only one who thinks that this is irrelevant?
That is the knee-jerk reaction, making it illegal. In my view, that will backfire.
The proper course of action is to integrate it into society at large. There are huge benefits from having a decentralized, real currency like Bitcoin. It can drive individual freedom and responsibility to an unprecedented level.
Personally, I think it's a God-send.
More difficult, yes. Businesses in Africa won't care that bitcoins are illegal for businesses in the United States, or if they do, they will be happy about it because they will get a monopoly capture advantage that they didn't have to lobby for. Internet sales are largely unaffected by the location of the business. For that matter, the business could be in some small country in Africa, next to the servers; while the products are shipped by a standard dropshipping agency in the United States. Win-Win!
I agree that bitcoin could have a great future in certain countries. And there, I hope, it will lead by example and make it impossible to reject in the west. I even think we should actively push bitcoin in specific countries. Should greece drop the euro we NEED to push bitcoin over there as the next currency WILL go for massive devaluation. That's a huge opportunity.
But I just warn you that it will be rough in most western countries!
I think we all know why Bitcoin has been hung up around $18-19 for as long as it has. It's the fear of governments making it illegal. Am I the only one who thinks that this is irrelevant?
Long? It's been a few days... You can't expect huge increases in exchange rates to keep up day in, day out.
What if downloading torrents is made illegal... Oh, wait..
Business is not like downloading movies: if you want to sell a service you need visibility. If for everyone visible it is forbidden to use bitcoins it's going to be difficult...
More difficult, yes. Businesses in Africa won't care that bitcoins are illegal for businesses in the United States, or if they do, they will be happy about it because they will get a monopoly capture advantage that they didn't have to lobby for. Internet sales are largely unaffected by the location of the business. For that matter, the business could be in some small country in Africa, next to the servers; while the products are shipped by a standard dropshipping agency in the United States. Win-Win!
What if downloading torrents is made illegal... Oh, wait..
Business is not like downloading movies: if you want to sell a service you need visibility. If for everyone visible it is forbidden to use bitcoins it's going to be difficult...
What if downloading torrents is made illegal... Oh, wait..
To everyone who thinks bitcoin is undestructible, here is a plausible scenario:
The US or IWF or G8 members or whoever will produce a ruling in which they define a minimum set of auditing requirements for taxable electronic transactions (or some mumbo jumbo of that kind). It will not be targeted at bitcoin directly... but will affect it.
They will forbid to offer any service using "unapproved means of transaction", making it virtually impossible to spend bitcoins on anything publicly advertised.
Forget your point-of-sale initiatives or online shops within any G8 country then. Sure, you could order from some other country, but how do you offer your services if you live in the USA, Canada, Germany, France, Italy, Switzerland etc? Tor? You sure won't be able to put up a sign "We accept bitcoins". You won't be able to write it on your homepage.
Of course bitcoin will live on, but how the hell do you want to build a working economy based on bitcoins in the western world? Pretend everyone starts using tor when looking for services?
The US or IWF or G8 members or whoever will produce a ruling in which they define a minimum set of auditing requirements for taxable electronic transactions (or some mumbo jumbo of that kind). It will not be targeted at bitcoin directly... but will affect it.
They will forbid to offer any service using "unapproved means of transaction", making it virtually impossible to spend bitcoins on anything publicly advertised.
Forget your point-of-sale initiatives or online shops within any G8 country then. Sure, you could order from some other country, but how do you offer your services if you live in the USA, Canada, Germany, France, Italy, Switzerland etc? Tor? You sure won't be able to put up a sign "We accept bitcoins". You won't be able to write it on your homepage.
Of course bitcoin will live on, but how the hell do you want to build a working economy based on bitcoins in the western world? Pretend everyone starts using tor when looking for services?
The world is not just the USA. Bitcoin is global. It will only hurt the US if they make it illegal, I think. Some other country will pick up the slack in reduced bitcoin activity.
Don't underestimate the desire (or ability) of the US government to control the world.
Jump to: