Pages:
Author

Topic: If PMCs are so bad for the investor, WHAT IS THE ANSWER? - page 2. (Read 2379 times)

full member
Activity: 213
Merit: 100
I keep reading that perpetual mining contracts (PMCs) are a poor performing investment overall. Okay, I'll assume for sake of argument that such is true.

So, given the following (not all inclusive):

  • An investor does not want to mine
  • An investor does not have the funds to buy their own equipment
  • An investor wants to take advantage of the fact that large volume purchases could lower the overall $/GHps for hardware
  • An investor wants to take advantage of another site's lower hosting costs (i.e. lower electricity, security, adequate HVAC)
  • An investor wants to rely on another's mining equipment expertise

What type of investment vehicle is out there and how should it be implemented?
Pages:
Jump to: