Topic: If that really is Satoshi, how can we help him? (Read 2755 times)
Only he can protect himself,just keep on denying any relation with BTC.
We can get a Spartacus thing going to confuse major media but I doubt Dorian is Satoshi
Me 2.
That's why I said we need to fundraise and protect this guy.
We can get a Spartacus thing going to confuse major media but I doubt Dorian is Satoshi
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/protect-satoshi-504344
I AM LOOKING FOR A SENIOR OR HERO MEMBER TO HELP ME ON THIS.
This guy will get in trouble, and if we don't respond quick then we do not deserve the Satoshis we have.
Simple!
You called? I AM LOOKING FOR A SENIOR OR HERO MEMBER TO HELP ME ON THIS.
This guy will get in trouble, and if we don't respond quick then we do not deserve the Satoshis we have.
Simple!
Yep, but apparently Andreas is on it....
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/protect-satoshi-504344
I AM LOOKING FOR A SENIOR OR HERO MEMBER TO HELP ME ON THIS.
This guy will get in trouble, and if we don't respond quick then we do not deserve the Satoshis we have.
Simple!
You called? I AM LOOKING FOR A SENIOR OR HERO MEMBER TO HELP ME ON THIS.
This guy will get in trouble, and if we don't respond quick then we do not deserve the Satoshis we have.
Simple!
To be fair;
He is not Satoshi, but he might need some community help.
The naming and shaming done by newsweek paints a great bullseye on him ( Innocent dude, remember that).
But even that he is not our Satoshi, we need should let everyone know: He is under community protection from now on.
He is not Satoshi, but he might need some community help.
The naming and shaming done by newsweek paints a great bullseye on him ( Innocent dude, remember that).
But even that he is not our Satoshi, we need should let everyone know: He is under community protection from now on.
Glad to hear you say that.
Since he is under community protection then we should ALL donate some BTC to protect him.
Did anybody even try to make a such statement?
This will definitely give some food for thoughts for the ones who are trying to crush Bitcoin.
What do we say?: [quotes Gandalf the Gray (at the time)]
Thou shall not pass!
Let's get one of the more senior members on the forum to provide adresses.
I'll donate. This shit is just retarded. Some guy, named Satoshi, gets in a lot of shit because one news agency claims he is 'the' Satoshi. Well, he is not, and got a bulleye painted on him. If I could donate some BTC, and some trusted forum member could provide an adress. And with that BTC, just hire a security detail to post at his house. The dude needs protection from now on, let's provide some. (If anyone is in the general area, and is willing to make connections a priv. security company, Please do!)
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/protect-satoshi-504344
I AM LOOKING FOR A SENIOR OR HERO MEMBER TO HELP ME ON THIS.
This guy will get in trouble, and if we don't respond quick then we do not deserve the Satoshis we have.
Simple!
To be fair;
He is not Satoshi, but he might need some community help.
The naming and shaming done by newsweek paints a great bullseye on him ( Innocent dude, remember that).
But even that he is not our Satoshi, we need should let everyone know: He is under community protection from now on.
He is not Satoshi, but he might need some community help.
The naming and shaming done by newsweek paints a great bullseye on him ( Innocent dude, remember that).
But even that he is not our Satoshi, we need should let everyone know: He is under community protection from now on.
Glad to hear you say that.
Since he is under community protection then we should ALL donate some BTC to protect him.
Did anybody even try to make a such statement?
This will definitely give some food for thoughts for the ones who are trying to crush Bitcoin.
What do we say?: [quotes Gandalf the Gray (at the time)]
Thou shall not pass!
Let's get one of the more senior members on the forum to provide adresses.
I'll donate. This shit is just retarded. Some guy, named Satoshi, gets in a lot of shit because one news agency claims he is 'the' Satoshi. Well, he is not, and got a bulleye painted on him. If I could donate some BTC, and some trusted forum member could provide an adress. And with that BTC, just hire a security detail to post at his house. The dude needs protection from now on, let's provide some. (If anyone is in the general area, and is willing to make connections a priv. security company, Please do!)
To be fair;
He is not Satoshi, but he might need some community help.
The naming and shaming done by newsweek paints a great bullseye on him ( Innocent dude, remember that).
But even that he is not our Satoshi, we need should let everyone know: He is under community protection from now on.
He is not Satoshi, but he might need some community help.
The naming and shaming done by newsweek paints a great bullseye on him ( Innocent dude, remember that).
But even that he is not our Satoshi, we need should let everyone know: He is under community protection from now on.
Glad to hear you say that.
Since he is under community protection then we should ALL donate some BTC to protect him.
Did anybody even try to make a such statement?
This will definitely give some food for thoughts for the ones who are trying to crush Bitcoin.
What do we say?: [quotes Gandalf the Gray (at the time)]
Thou shall not pass!
The message I got from the article was that the only thing that he had to actually lose (assuming that his private keys etc are stored in a super safe place) is his privacy - which this article has completely blown out of the water, regardless of whether he is the Satoshi Nakamoto.
I mean his health is apparently not so great, he is disconnected from his family, his Bitcoins are probably secured, possible even inaccessible. The only thing he seems to want is the privacy to go about the things he wants to do.
I've no doubt made some assumptions in saying this but, to me, anything he had to lose, he has already lost thanks to this article.
His family could be in danger though, who knows. Hope that he and his family remain safe.
I mean his health is apparently not so great, he is disconnected from his family, his Bitcoins are probably secured, possible even inaccessible. The only thing he seems to want is the privacy to go about the things he wants to do.
I've no doubt made some assumptions in saying this but, to me, anything he had to lose, he has already lost thanks to this article.
His family could be in danger though, who knows. Hope that he and his family remain safe.
I don't think anyone is saying the guy did anything wrong and I doubt he wants anything to do with any "community protection".
To be fair;
He is not Satoshi, but he might need some community help.
The naming and shaming done by newsweek paints a great bullseye on him ( Innocent dude, remember that).
But even that he is not our Satoshi, we need should let everyone know: He is under community protection from now on.
He is not Satoshi, but he might need some community help.
The naming and shaming done by newsweek paints a great bullseye on him ( Innocent dude, remember that).
But even that he is not our Satoshi, we need should let everyone know: He is under community protection from now on.
I doubt the guy is in any danger with the publicity.
Is someone going to kidnap him in front of a bunch of reporters and shit? If someone did anything to him they would get busted instantly.
Is someone going to kidnap him in front of a bunch of reporters and shit? If someone did anything to him they would get busted instantly.
Unfortunately he lives in CA. That is going to make body guarding him difficult. You can't even carry a gun in that backwards state.
Can't even carry a bazooka either. Or a hand grenade. Or chemical weapons for hunting purposes. Damn. What a backwards state. How's a guy supposed to go on a school shooting with such backwards laws?
Damn.
He is Satoshi, but he is not THE Satoshi.
There are no evidences and this article is bulling some old dude after a stroke.
There are no evidences and this article is bulling some old dude after a stroke.
"bulling some old dude after a stroke" -exactly what I thought too.
This Satoshi media frenzy is a sett-up to lure the real one out from his shelter.
The real ones in plural is probably sitting in their office at NSA and laughing at this story.
I feel bad for him. If he has a plan, Im sure it has already been put into action. I also doubt that someone can simply rob or hack him of the coins/wallet. From what the article said he is extremely cautious and over-the-top security with everything. Id like to think that he has them set up somehow to only pass down to his kids 
This Satoshi media frenzy is a sett-up to lure the real one out from his shelter.
If this isn't the real Satoshi(which I think it is), then he's screwed, and if possible, I hope he can sue Newsweek..
If this is the real Satoshi, and he has all million Bitcoins in his possesion, then I say, deposit all of it to Fiat, pay for 100 bodyguards and move to Cheyenne Mountain. Cause there are some loco Bitcoiners out there, not to mention crooks.
If this is the real Satoshi, and he has all million Bitcoins in his possesion, then I say, deposit all of it to Fiat, pay for 100 bodyguards and move to Cheyenne Mountain. Cause there are some loco Bitcoiners out there, not to mention crooks.
The sad thing is whether or not this is Bitcoin's Satoshi, he would be in the same amount of danger. It's coincidentally like money, where if enough people believe it, it becomes de facto true.
Newsweek should employ a bodyguard for him after this stupid article.
The sad thing is whether or not this is Bitcoin's Satoshi, he would be in the same amount of danger. It's coincidentally like money, where if enough people believe it, it becomes de facto true.
Jump to: