Have you ever felt having a good knowledge about a certain subject matter on Bitcoin only to start a conversion or thread on the topic and end up discovering the information had lots of mistakes and misconception. How did you really feel about those subject matters and what was your approach towards the observation and correction made by other users on your thread.
The bitcoin ecosystem is ever-dynamic. There are discoveries and developments every day. When researching a topic access mainly current material. There have been times when members use outdated information to create a thread. There is nothing bad if you are corrected when the information is not correct. After all, we are all here to learn. And in the process of learning there will be mistakes and corrections.
While the concept of Bitcoin in general is broad and wide having a good knowledge of certain topic will require constant research and studying some of the concepts will even require experience and user interactivity. Example is the technical aspect of Bitcoin. I will like to discuss this how long do you spend doing research for a particular topic before making your post or do you have a glimpse of the subject matter get a good summary of it and then start a conversation or quality research is done followed by reviews before engaging in a conversation?
It would be wrong to start a discussion with false or outdated information. Members will be attracted to your thread if it is educative. You will only receive corrections and in some cases criticism when you put out a low-quality post filled with wrong facts.
No one should be starting a conversation on a subject they do not have a good grasp of. There is so much misconception and wrong information being spread that we should be hesitant to share any knowledge we are not fully certain of.
However one can start a discussion by asking a question or to seek clarification on a concept. But it is wrong when members want to teach what they have limited knowledge about.
