Pages:
Author

Topic: If you're mining at around break even prices, STOP! (Read 4711 times)

sr. member
Activity: 392
Merit: 250
I don't have to pay electricity bills and currently have 6 machines running (2x 5870 each). Therefore as long as someone is willing to buy BTC, I make money Smiley Not much per day, but it adds up Smiley

But SOMEONE is paying around $200 a month for your mining operation. Not all of us can (or will) steal that much electricity, especially without raising eyebrows/getting caught.

You must be in a college dorm or something. $200 a month is a lot, even for a business.
member
Activity: 66
Merit: 10
I don't have to pay electricity bills and currently have 6 machines running (2x 5870 each). Therefore as long as someone is willing to buy BTC, I make money Smiley Not much per day, but it adds up Smiley
full member
Activity: 196
Merit: 100
No, just feeding the trolls Tongue

Your points make sense for anyone who is considering mining - its far more profitable to buy and trade than to invest in new equipment right now.

There is no reason someone already mining should stop if they're profitable at all - there is also no reason they can't buy *and* mine.
hero member
Activity: 481
Merit: 502
Speculation belongs in the speculation thread.

FUD doesn't belong here at all.

The simple fact is it's pure capitalism - if you're making money, you'd be a fool to stop making money.  Even if it's just a few cents. Profit is always worthwhile as long as the effort required doesn't exceed it.

If you're not making money, cut your losses.  Fire it up again when you are.

The market adjusts accordingly. 

The only thing the 'newbie traders' on the forum need to know that they might not already know is you will be constantly discouraged by fools looking to vampire your share Tongue

Yeah okay, so how exactly is this speculation or FUD?

I stated simple facts and ideas. Never at any point did I say anything like "do this and bitcoins will be >$30 in no time!"..

It is very basic capitalism, yes. It makes more sense (for the people I'm referring these ideas to) to BUY than MINE, as you can see greater profits, or rather, fewer losses. So I am only re-iterating what you said basically.

"if you're not making money from mining, considering buying instead"

Are you spreading FUD too?
full member
Activity: 196
Merit: 100
Speculation belongs in the speculation thread.

FUD doesn't belong here at all.

The simple fact is it's pure capitalism - if you're making money, you'd be a fool to stop making money.  Even if it's just a few cents. Profit is always worthwhile as long as the effort required doesn't exceed it.

If you're not making money, cut your losses.  Fire it up again when you are.

The market adjusts accordingly. 

The only thing the 'newbie traders' on the forum need to know that they might not already know is you will be constantly discouraged by fools looking to vampire your share Tongue
hero member
Activity: 481
Merit: 502
FYI I'm pointing my rig towards folding@home because I prefer donating to this cause than the others, regardless of efficency.

But the logic works exactly the same. "Stop competing with me, you aren't making money so neither am I."
Not really. All I'm trying to do is raise awareness. There's a lot of newbie traders on this forum that don't know.

And hah, yeah that's true. I didn't think about the "free heat" aspect of mining..
full member
Activity: 140
Merit: 100
Well I for one am gonna continue mining or I will freeze my but of in here.

I could close up the ventilation but then I will probably get irradiated by the radon this building ... so with no electricity bill and the computer smelling less then the oven ... good luck to you trying to get a bigger piece of the mining pie for yourself anyway.
legendary
Activity: 1666
Merit: 1057
Marketing manager - GO MP
But the logic works exactly the same. "Stop competing with me, you aren't making money so neither am I."
The problem is nobody has the upper hand anymore, you could easily make it harder for everyone else for free or even if it costs you something.
The time when profits are to be made again if someone could find a cost effective solution to mine with fpgas.
hero member
Activity: 672
Merit: 500
But the logic works exactly the same. "Stop competing with me, you aren't making money so neither am I."
hero member
Activity: 481
Merit: 502
This is probably stating the obvious, but I felt it should be posted anyway..

If you're running a small retail business and only making a liveable income or perhaps just breaking even and hoping for the economy to improve, STOP!
You should really be working for someone else instead.

If you stop being self employed and start working for a company:

+ you are raising the demand for consumer goods by purchasing what you used to sell
+ you are making it easier for other businesses to compete

Thoughts?
Incorrect, irrelevant and boring.

How can you compare running a small retail business to mining for Bitcoin?  Huh
Hah, they're completely different things..
legendary
Activity: 1148
Merit: 1008
If you want to walk on water, get out of the boat
I prefer efficiency.

There are a lot of projects where ATI (i still call it ati because yes) is better than nvidia, crunching on folding is a bit wasting energy. A nvidia is much better on it.

Also, i said that because a lot of people know Folding but how many people know Milkyway? Collatz? Moo! Wrapper? And that on them ATI is much better than nvidia?
donator
Activity: 1218
Merit: 1079
Gerald Davis
Yup but bitcoin mining=ati, so if you use mining hardware on folding, it's using ati on folding. A  bad idea  Cheesy

Why?  If someone wants to support Folding then it doesn't really matter that they don't have the best "rig" for it.  Many people use AMD hardware (no more ATI) on Folding @Home.  They aren't ever going to be a top folder but they do it because they believe in the project and want to donate their computing power there (not to some other project).
legendary
Activity: 1148
Merit: 1008
If you want to walk on water, get out of the boat
Yup but bitcoin mining=ati, so if you use mining hardware on folding, it's using ati on folding. A  bad idea  Cheesy
hero member
Activity: 672
Merit: 500
This is probably stating the obvious, but I felt it should be posted anyway..

If you're running a small retail business and only making a liveable income or perhaps just breaking even and hoping for the economy to improve, STOP!
You should really be working for someone else instead.

If you stop being self employed and start working for a company:

+ you are raising the demand for consumer goods by purchasing what you used to sell
+ you are making it easier for other businesses to compete

Thoughts?
full member
Activity: 154
Merit: 100
Folding@home? Are you joking?

ATI sucks with folding@Home

If you want to go distributed computing and you have ATI then crunch for projects like Milkyway@Home, Collatz or Moo! Wrapper, they run much better on ATI.

Folding is for nvidia and cpu. Not for ati. It's like mining bitcoins with a nvidia.

I didn't say anything about ATI vs Nvidia - I was speaking purely of the return.
legendary
Activity: 1148
Merit: 1008
If you want to walk on water, get out of the boat
Folding@home? Are you joking?

ATI sucks with folding@Home

If you want to go distributed computing and you have ATI then crunch for projects like Milkyway@Home, Collatz or Moo! Wrapper, they run much better on ATI.

Folding is for nvidia and cpu. Not for ati. It's like mining bitcoins with a nvidia.
full member
Activity: 154
Merit: 100
The arguments about mining to increase the security of bitcoin are technically true, but in practice, false.

What does this even mean?

For instance, someone who has a lot of BTC has an interest in mining to secure their own holdings.  People also participate in folding@home, and there is 0 immediate return.  For others, mining at a current loss is equivalent of 'shorting' the money you pay for electricity to mine in the first place.

There are many reasons to mine below the 'break even' point.
donator
Activity: 1218
Merit: 1079
Gerald Davis
The arguments about mining to increase the security of bitcoin are technically true, but in practice, false.

Care to explain?
legendary
Activity: 2646
Merit: 2842
Shitcoin Minimalist
I agree, OP. I think, ultimately, buying bitcoins is much more beneficial to the currency than mining them at this point.

The arguments about mining to increase the security of bitcoin are technically true, but in practice, false. As for mining for "fun"? Aside from building the systems, I really don't understand what's fun about mining. Before I liquidated all my rigs, they were running totally independently for weeks/months at a time with no intervention from me whatsoever.
hero member
Activity: 481
Merit: 502
It doesn't lower rate coins are produced.  Difficulty re-adjusts every 2 weeks to keep rate of coin generation relatively constant.
Yeah, a slight oversight on my part. I'll ammend my post.

Please use the Search feature. This topic has been posted many many times in the past.  No need to repost an old topic again.
If you're going to clutter up the thread with pointless things like this atleast post links to the similar topics in question. I did a search and found nothing with regards to what I wanted to say, but if it has been posted in the past then the market has changed and it doesn't exactly hurt to re-iterate on these points which are probably buried in the forums by now which no-one will likely see again.
Pages:
Jump to: