I am going from here let me know when all the negative trust left in last 24 will be removed by those member who left them.
Email - [email protected]
Just a single email will work from Quickseller
Only one person is responsible for this Quickseller he has to apologies for his wrong perception.
I will return all the funds within 24 hours after getting email from him.
Topic: I'm Not Running any Ponzi and I'm not a Ponzi scammer - page 3. (Read 3579 times)
Well seems like your scam accusation against yourself worked after all, you got more negative red trust. By the way i contacted bit-mixer manager to kick you out of their campaign but he didnt respond yet.
I always knew this guy was shady since my first trust rating i left him, i called it!
I always knew this guy was shady since my first trust rating i left him, i called it!
Like I said in my PM to you, and in my neutral trust rating, the evidence in your PM history is inclusive and I do not think it disproves the fact that it appears as if you are running various ponzi sites via potential alts.
You already had a negative trust rating from dooglus when SNavy had agreed to use you to escrow/run their signature campaign. I do not think I have ever seen anyone accept escrow from someone when the person offering their escrow services had an overall negative trust rating. Not only that, but I did not see any kind of conversation between you and SNavy regarding the negative rating, which is something that I would expect to happen.
According to your above post, you did not receive a response and/or were rejected when you proposed running a signature campaign on behalf of 4 other companies, plus one more that I found in your PM history would make five. That means that 2 out of 7 sites agreed to use your services, which works out to a ~14% conversation rate, which IMO is extremely high for what is effectively cold calling, and the proposal you wrote was effectively an initial pitch to get their attention, not a more detailed sales pitch once they responded.
I am also not the only one who believes that you are running the two likely scam sites whose signature campaigns you are running. You have received negative trust ratings from a number of other people, and several people in your various threads have accused you of running the sites you are escrowing for.
I hope you can understand how a reasonable person can come to the same conclusion that I did with the facts that were available to me (and available to the public).
I'm running with the money now and will return the money to the owner only if Quickseller remove his trust rating from my account and apologies for his big mistake and agree not to make this kind of mistake again in future I'm also wrong about my perception that he is a genius in finding alt account i wants let everyone know he just neglect the fact available and accept the fact that are not available to judge alt account. I don't think his rating can be taken as trusted.You already had a negative trust rating from dooglus when SNavy had agreed to use you to escrow/run their signature campaign. I do not think I have ever seen anyone accept escrow from someone when the person offering their escrow services had an overall negative trust rating. Not only that, but I did not see any kind of conversation between you and SNavy regarding the negative rating, which is something that I would expect to happen.
According to your above post, you did not receive a response and/or were rejected when you proposed running a signature campaign on behalf of 4 other companies, plus one more that I found in your PM history would make five. That means that 2 out of 7 sites agreed to use your services, which works out to a ~14% conversation rate, which IMO is extremely high for what is effectively cold calling, and the proposal you wrote was effectively an initial pitch to get their attention, not a more detailed sales pitch once they responded.
I am also not the only one who believes that you are running the two likely scam sites whose signature campaigns you are running. You have received negative trust ratings from a number of other people, and several people in your various threads have accused you of running the sites you are escrowing for.
I hope you can understand how a reasonable person can come to the same conclusion that I did with the facts that were available to me (and available to the public).
Only Quickseller knows the password of this account and he was solely responsible for any hack on this account.
Quickseller looks very confident about his allegation what if it is found that i'm not snavy or any other alt which is posting in investor based game is not mine will he pay the 0.7 BTC of Snavy.
Negative feedback left. Nice blackmail
You got negative feedback from Dooglus. About QS's feedback is not affect on default trust except you're put him/her into your trust list.
There's a risk to involve with Ponzi. If you are not promoting CRYPTO-MMM.com earlier, Dooglus will not leave you red-ve
There's a risk to involve with Ponzi. If you are not promoting CRYPTO-MMM.com earlier, Dooglus will not leave you red-ve
Like I said in my PM to you, and in my neutral trust rating, the evidence in your PM history is inclusive and I do not think it disproves the fact that it appears as if you are running various ponzi sites via potential alts.
You already had a negative trust rating from dooglus when SNavy had agreed to use you to escrow/run their signature campaign. I do not think I have ever seen anyone accept escrow from someone when the person offering their escrow services had an overall negative trust rating. Not only that, but I did not see any kind of conversation between you and SNavy regarding the negative rating, which is something that I would expect to happen.
According to your above post, you did not receive a response and/or were rejected when you proposed running a signature campaign on behalf of 4 other companies, plus one more that I found in your PM history would make five. That means that 2 out of 7 sites agreed to use your services, which works out to a ~14% conversation rate, which IMO is extremely high for what is effectively cold calling, and the proposal you wrote was effectively an initial pitch to get their attention, not a more detailed sales pitch once they responded.
I am also not the only one who believes that you are running the two likely scam sites whose signature campaigns you are running. You have received negative trust ratings from a number of other people, and several people in your various threads have accused you of running the sites you are escrowing for.
I hope you can understand how a reasonable person can come to the same conclusion that I did with the facts that were available to me (and available to the public).
I'm running with the money now and will return the money to the owner only if Quickseller remove his trust rating from my account and apologies for his big mistake and agree not to make this kind of mistake again in future I'm also wrong about my perception that he is a genius in finding alt account i wants let everyone know he just neglect the fact available and accept the fact that are not available to judge alt account. I don't think his rating can be taken as trusted.You already had a negative trust rating from dooglus when SNavy had agreed to use you to escrow/run their signature campaign. I do not think I have ever seen anyone accept escrow from someone when the person offering their escrow services had an overall negative trust rating. Not only that, but I did not see any kind of conversation between you and SNavy regarding the negative rating, which is something that I would expect to happen.
According to your above post, you did not receive a response and/or were rejected when you proposed running a signature campaign on behalf of 4 other companies, plus one more that I found in your PM history would make five. That means that 2 out of 7 sites agreed to use your services, which works out to a ~14% conversation rate, which IMO is extremely high for what is effectively cold calling, and the proposal you wrote was effectively an initial pitch to get their attention, not a more detailed sales pitch once they responded.
I am also not the only one who believes that you are running the two likely scam sites whose signature campaigns you are running. You have received negative trust ratings from a number of other people, and several people in your various threads have accused you of running the sites you are escrowing for.
I hope you can understand how a reasonable person can come to the same conclusion that I did with the facts that were available to me (and available to the public).
Only Quickseller knows the password of this account and he was solely responsible for any hack on this account.
Quickseller looks very confident about his allegation what if it is found that i'm not snavy or any other alt which is posting in investor based game is not mine will he pay the 0.7 BTC of Snavy.
Blackmail?
Looks like blackmail to me. If he is planning to "regain" his trust, he isn't doing a good job about it. I don't see how the two issues here are related like that. Quickseller negtrusting him are no grounds for him to scam the other guy by keeping his money. Then again, the other guy is promoting a ponzi... (That is all considering they are not just the same person)
Like I said in my PM to you, and in my neutral trust rating, the evidence in your PM history is inclusive and I do not think it disproves the fact that it appears as if you are running various ponzi sites via potential alts.
You already had a negative trust rating from dooglus when SNavy had agreed to use you to escrow/run their signature campaign. I do not think I have ever seen anyone accept escrow from someone when the person offering their escrow services had an overall negative trust rating. Not only that, but I did not see any kind of conversation between you and SNavy regarding the negative rating, which is something that I would expect to happen.
According to your above post, you did not receive a response and/or were rejected when you proposed running a signature campaign on behalf of 4 other companies, plus one more that I found in your PM history would make five. That means that 2 out of 7 sites agreed to use your services, which works out to a ~14% conversation rate, which IMO is extremely high for what is effectively cold calling, and the proposal you wrote was effectively an initial pitch to get their attention, not a more detailed sales pitch once they responded.
I am also not the only one who believes that you are running the two likely scam sites whose signature campaigns you are running. You have received negative trust ratings from a number of other people, and several people in your various threads have accused you of running the sites you are escrowing for.
I hope you can understand how a reasonable person can come to the same conclusion that I did with the facts that were available to me (and available to the public).
I'm running with the money now and will return the money to the owner only if Quickseller remove his trust rating from my account and apologies for his big mistake and agree not to make this kind of mistake again in future I'm also wrong about my perception that he is a genius in finding alt account i wants let everyone know he just neglect the fact available and accept the fact that are not available to judge alt account. I don't think his rating can be taken as trusted.You already had a negative trust rating from dooglus when SNavy had agreed to use you to escrow/run their signature campaign. I do not think I have ever seen anyone accept escrow from someone when the person offering their escrow services had an overall negative trust rating. Not only that, but I did not see any kind of conversation between you and SNavy regarding the negative rating, which is something that I would expect to happen.
According to your above post, you did not receive a response and/or were rejected when you proposed running a signature campaign on behalf of 4 other companies, plus one more that I found in your PM history would make five. That means that 2 out of 7 sites agreed to use your services, which works out to a ~14% conversation rate, which IMO is extremely high for what is effectively cold calling, and the proposal you wrote was effectively an initial pitch to get their attention, not a more detailed sales pitch once they responded.
I am also not the only one who believes that you are running the two likely scam sites whose signature campaigns you are running. You have received negative trust ratings from a number of other people, and several people in your various threads have accused you of running the sites you are escrowing for.
I hope you can understand how a reasonable person can come to the same conclusion that I did with the facts that were available to me (and available to the public).
Only Quickseller knows the password of this account and he was solely responsible for any hack on this account.
Quickseller looks very confident about his allegation what if it is found that i'm not snavy or any other alt which is posting in investor based game is not mine will he pay the 0.7 BTC of Snavy.
Blackmail?
Like I said in my PM to you, and in my neutral trust rating, the evidence in your PM history is inclusive and I do not think it disproves the fact that it appears as if you are running various ponzi sites via potential alts.
You already had a negative trust rating from dooglus when SNavy had agreed to use you to escrow/run their signature campaign. I do not think I have ever seen anyone accept escrow from someone when the person offering their escrow services had an overall negative trust rating. Not only that, but I did not see any kind of conversation between you and SNavy regarding the negative rating, which is something that I would expect to happen.
According to your above post, you did not receive a response and/or were rejected when you proposed running a signature campaign on behalf of 4 other companies, plus one more that I found in your PM history would make five. That means that 2 out of 7 sites agreed to use your services, which works out to a ~14% conversation rate, which IMO is extremely high for what is effectively cold calling, and the proposal you wrote was effectively an initial pitch to get their attention, not a more detailed sales pitch once they responded.
I am also not the only one who believes that you are running the two likely scam sites whose signature campaigns you are running. You have received negative trust ratings from a number of other people, and several people in your various threads have accused you of running the sites you are escrowing for.
I hope you can understand how a reasonable person can come to the same conclusion that I did with the facts that were available to me (and available to the public).
I'm running with the money now and will return the money to the owner only if Quickseller remove his trust rating from my account and apologies for his big mistake and agree not to make this kind of mistake again in future I'm also wrong about my perception that he is a genius in finding alt account i wants let everyone know he just neglect the fact available and accept the fact that are not available to judge alt account. I don't think his rating can be taken as trusted.You already had a negative trust rating from dooglus when SNavy had agreed to use you to escrow/run their signature campaign. I do not think I have ever seen anyone accept escrow from someone when the person offering their escrow services had an overall negative trust rating. Not only that, but I did not see any kind of conversation between you and SNavy regarding the negative rating, which is something that I would expect to happen.
According to your above post, you did not receive a response and/or were rejected when you proposed running a signature campaign on behalf of 4 other companies, plus one more that I found in your PM history would make five. That means that 2 out of 7 sites agreed to use your services, which works out to a ~14% conversation rate, which IMO is extremely high for what is effectively cold calling, and the proposal you wrote was effectively an initial pitch to get their attention, not a more detailed sales pitch once they responded.
I am also not the only one who believes that you are running the two likely scam sites whose signature campaigns you are running. You have received negative trust ratings from a number of other people, and several people in your various threads have accused you of running the sites you are escrowing for.
I hope you can understand how a reasonable person can come to the same conclusion that I did with the facts that were available to me (and available to the public).
Only Quickseller knows the password of this account and he was solely responsible for any hack on this account.
Quickseller looks very confident about his allegation what if it is found that i'm not snavy or any other alt which is posting in investor based game is not mine will he pay the 0.7 BTC of Snavy.
Blackmail?
As i said before its really weird that someone would contact you to be escrow for their campaign and so far 2 ponzies have done so. You said you were the one actually contacting them so you are indeed promoting or trying to promote ponzies, i still dont understand why would they accept you as an escrow unless you have something to do with them, there are plenty of good escrows and you never even had green trust.
Also you are participating in the bit mixer sig campaign with red trust, you shouldnt be able since in their rules its clearly specified that you cant participate if you get valid negative trust rating. In a way you could say you are scamming bit mixer.
Also you are participating in the bit mixer sig campaign with red trust, you shouldnt be able since in their rules its clearly specified that you cant participate if you get valid negative trust rating. In a way you could say you are scamming bit mixer.
I think BTCBLOGGER is not the owner of any ponzi but yeah I want him never in future again to promote any ponzi by encouraging them to run signature campaigns ... QuickSeller is not wrong in his opinion as BTCBLOGGER escrows many campaigns so he might think that he is the owner. I really believe BTCBLOGGER is not the owner, but why are you promoting ponzi man ?
I'm running with the money now and will return the money to the owner only if Quickseller remove his trust rating from my account and apologies for his big mistake and agree not to make this kind of mistake again in future I'm also wrong about my perception that he is a genius in finding alt account i wants let everyone know he just neglect the fact available and accept the fact that are not available to judge alt account. I don't think his rating can be taken as trusted.
Only Quickseller knows the password of this account and he was solely responsible for any hack on this account.
Quickseller looks very confident about his allegation what if it is found that i'm not snavy or any other alt which is posting in investor based game is not mine will he pay the 0.7 BTC of Snavy.
If you are threatening to run away with money you were entrusted with if I do not remove negative trust feedback, then that along makes you untrustworthy.
I'm running with the money now and will return the money to the owner only if Quickseller remove his trust rating from my account and apologies for his big mistake and agree not to make this kind of mistake again in future I'm also wrong about my perception that he is a genius in finding alt account i wants let everyone know he just neglect the fact available and accept the fact that are not available to judge alt account. I don't think his rating can be taken as trusted.
Only Quickseller knows the password of this account and he was solely responsible for any hack on this account.
Quickseller looks very confident about his allegation what if it is found that i'm not snavy or any other alt which is posting in investor based game is not mine will he pay the 0.7 BTC of Snavy.
Yeah this is really ugly that due to someone else's trust ratings you are eating the money of the owner of a ponzi. You have no right on that money and if you are even thinking of getting those and run away then how can we trust you in future ?
[/quote]
People are not trusting me right now how can i think that they will trust me in future.
Ask quickseller to remove trust rating and apologies for his big mistake and ask Snavy to withraw his campaign i will return all the money to him.
Sorry for my rude behavior but people here made me angry by saying bad things to me.
I'm running with the money now and will return the money to the owner only if Quickseller remove his trust rating from my account and apologies for his big mistake.
If you are threatening to run away with money you were entrusted with if I do not remove negative trust feedback, then that along makes you untrustworthy. Yeah this is really ugly that due to someone else's trust ratings you are eating the money of the owner of a ponzi. You have no right on that money and if you are even thinking of getting those and run away then how can we trust you in future ?
Like I said in my PM to you, and in my neutral trust rating, the evidence in your PM history is inclusive and I do not think it disproves the fact that it appears as if you are running various ponzi sites via potential alts.
You already had a negative trust rating from dooglus when SNavy had agreed to use you to escrow/run their signature campaign. I do not think I have ever seen anyone accept escrow from someone when the person offering their escrow services had an overall negative trust rating. Not only that, but I did not see any kind of conversation between you and SNavy regarding the negative rating, which is something that I would expect to happen.
According to your above post, you did not receive a response and/or were rejected when you proposed running a signature campaign on behalf of 4 other companies, plus one more that I found in your PM history would make five. That means that 2 out of 7 sites agreed to use your services, which works out to a ~14% conversation rate, which IMO is extremely high for what is effectively cold calling, and the proposal you wrote was effectively an initial pitch to get their attention, not a more detailed sales pitch once they responded.
I am also not the only one who believes that you are running the two likely scam sites whose signature campaigns you are running. You have received negative trust ratings from a number of other people, and several people in your various threads have accused you of running the sites you are escrowing for.
I hope you can understand how a reasonable person can come to the same conclusion that I did with the facts that were available to me (and available to the public).
I'm running with the money now and will return the money to the owner only if Quickseller remove his trust rating from my account and apologies for his big mistake and agree not to make this kind of mistake again in future I'm also wrong about my perception that he is a genius in finding alt account i wants let everyone know he just neglect the fact available and accept the fact that are not available to judge alt account. I don't think his rating can be taken as trusted.You already had a negative trust rating from dooglus when SNavy had agreed to use you to escrow/run their signature campaign. I do not think I have ever seen anyone accept escrow from someone when the person offering their escrow services had an overall negative trust rating. Not only that, but I did not see any kind of conversation between you and SNavy regarding the negative rating, which is something that I would expect to happen.
According to your above post, you did not receive a response and/or were rejected when you proposed running a signature campaign on behalf of 4 other companies, plus one more that I found in your PM history would make five. That means that 2 out of 7 sites agreed to use your services, which works out to a ~14% conversation rate, which IMO is extremely high for what is effectively cold calling, and the proposal you wrote was effectively an initial pitch to get their attention, not a more detailed sales pitch once they responded.
I am also not the only one who believes that you are running the two likely scam sites whose signature campaigns you are running. You have received negative trust ratings from a number of other people, and several people in your various threads have accused you of running the sites you are escrowing for.
I hope you can understand how a reasonable person can come to the same conclusion that I did with the facts that were available to me (and available to the public).
Only Quickseller knows the password of this account and he was solely responsible for any hack on this account.
Quickseller looks very confident about his allegation what if it is found that i'm not snavy or any other alt which is posting in investor based game is not mine will he pay the 0.7 BTC of Snavy.
Yeah I'm going now and the person is responsible for this is you only you.
Like I said in my PM to you, and in my neutral trust rating, the evidence in your PM history is inclusive and I do not think it disproves the fact that it appears as if you are running various ponzi sites via potential alts.
You already had a negative trust rating from dooglus when SNavy had agreed to use you to escrow/run their signature campaign. I do not think I have ever seen anyone accept escrow from someone when the person offering their escrow services had an overall negative trust rating. Not only that, but I did not see any kind of conversation between you and SNavy regarding the negative rating, which is something that I would expect to happen.
According to your above post, you did not receive a response and/or were rejected when you proposed running a signature campaign on behalf of 4 other companies, plus one more that I found in your PM history would make five. That means that 2 out of 7 sites agreed to use your services, which works out to a ~14% conversation rate, which IMO is extremely high for what is effectively cold calling, and the proposal you wrote was effectively an initial pitch to get their attention, not a more detailed sales pitch once they responded.
I am also not the only one who believes that you are running the two likely scam sites whose signature campaigns you are running. You have received negative trust ratings from a number of other people, and several people in your various threads have accused you of running the sites you are escrowing for.
I hope you can understand how a reasonable person can come to the same conclusion that I did with the facts that were available to me (and available to the public).
I'm running with the money now and will return the money to the owner only if Quickseller remove his trust rating from my account and apologies for his big mistake and agree not to make this kind of mistake again in future I'm also wrong about my perception that he is a genius in finding alt account i wants let everyone know he just neglect the fact available and accept the fact that are not available to judge alt account. I don't think his rating can be taken as trusted.You already had a negative trust rating from dooglus when SNavy had agreed to use you to escrow/run their signature campaign. I do not think I have ever seen anyone accept escrow from someone when the person offering their escrow services had an overall negative trust rating. Not only that, but I did not see any kind of conversation between you and SNavy regarding the negative rating, which is something that I would expect to happen.
According to your above post, you did not receive a response and/or were rejected when you proposed running a signature campaign on behalf of 4 other companies, plus one more that I found in your PM history would make five. That means that 2 out of 7 sites agreed to use your services, which works out to a ~14% conversation rate, which IMO is extremely high for what is effectively cold calling, and the proposal you wrote was effectively an initial pitch to get their attention, not a more detailed sales pitch once they responded.
I am also not the only one who believes that you are running the two likely scam sites whose signature campaigns you are running. You have received negative trust ratings from a number of other people, and several people in your various threads have accused you of running the sites you are escrowing for.
I hope you can understand how a reasonable person can come to the same conclusion that I did with the facts that were available to me (and available to the public).
Only Quickseller knows the password of this account and he was solely responsible for any hack on this account.
Quickseller looks very confident about his allegation what if it is found that i'm not snavy or any other alt which is posting in investor based game is not mine will he pay the 0.7 BTC of Snavy.
Like I said in my PM to you, and in my neutral trust rating, the evidence in your PM history is inclusive and I do not think it disproves the fact that it appears as if you are running various ponzi sites via potential alts.
You already had a negative trust rating from dooglus when SNavy had agreed to use you to escrow/run their signature campaign. I do not think I have ever seen anyone accept escrow from someone when the person offering their escrow services had an overall negative trust rating. Not only that, but I did not see any kind of conversation between you and SNavy regarding the negative rating, which is something that I would expect to happen.
According to your above post, you did not receive a response and/or were rejected when you proposed running a signature campaign on behalf of 4 other companies, plus one more that I found in your PM history would make five. That means that 2 out of 7 sites agreed to use your services, which works out to a ~14% conversation rate, which IMO is extremely high for what is effectively cold calling, and the proposal you wrote was effectively an initial pitch to get their attention, not a more detailed sales pitch once they responded.
I am also not the only one who believes that you are running the two likely scam sites whose signature campaigns you are running. You have received negative trust ratings from a number of other people, and several people in your various threads have accused you of running the sites you are escrowing for.
I hope you can understand how a reasonable person can come to the same conclusion that I did with the facts that were available to me (and available to the public).
I'm running with the money now and will return the money to the owner only if Quickseller remove his trust rating from my account and apologies for his big mistake and agree not to make this kind of mistake again in future I'm also wrong about my perception that he is a genius in finding alt account i wants let everyone know he just neglect the fact available and accept the fact that are not available to judge alt account. I don't think his rating can be taken as trusted.You already had a negative trust rating from dooglus when SNavy had agreed to use you to escrow/run their signature campaign. I do not think I have ever seen anyone accept escrow from someone when the person offering their escrow services had an overall negative trust rating. Not only that, but I did not see any kind of conversation between you and SNavy regarding the negative rating, which is something that I would expect to happen.
According to your above post, you did not receive a response and/or were rejected when you proposed running a signature campaign on behalf of 4 other companies, plus one more that I found in your PM history would make five. That means that 2 out of 7 sites agreed to use your services, which works out to a ~14% conversation rate, which IMO is extremely high for what is effectively cold calling, and the proposal you wrote was effectively an initial pitch to get their attention, not a more detailed sales pitch once they responded.
I am also not the only one who believes that you are running the two likely scam sites whose signature campaigns you are running. You have received negative trust ratings from a number of other people, and several people in your various threads have accused you of running the sites you are escrowing for.
I hope you can understand how a reasonable person can come to the same conclusion that I did with the facts that were available to me (and available to the public).
Only Quickseller knows the password of this account and he was solely responsible for any hack on this account.
Quickseller looks very confident about his allegation what if it is found that i'm not snavy or any other alt which is posting in investor based game is not mine will he pay the 0.7 BTC of Snavy.
Like I said in my PM to you, and in my neutral trust rating, the evidence in your PM history is inclusive and I do not think it disproves the fact that it appears as if you are running various ponzi sites via potential alts.
You already had a negative trust rating from dooglus when SNavy had agreed to use you to escrow/run their signature campaign. I do not think I have ever seen anyone accept escrow from someone when the person offering their escrow services had an overall negative trust rating. Not only that, but I did not see any kind of conversation between you and SNavy regarding the negative rating, which is something that I would expect to happen.
According to your above post, you did not receive a response and/or were rejected when you proposed running a signature campaign on behalf of 4 other companies, plus one more that I found in your PM history would make five. That means that 2 out of 7 sites agreed to use your services, which works out to a ~14% conversation rate, which IMO is extremely high for what is effectively cold calling, and the proposal you wrote was effectively an initial pitch to get their attention, not a more detailed sales pitch once they responded.
I am also not the only one who believes that you are running the two likely scam sites whose signature campaigns you are running. You have received negative trust ratings from a number of other people, and several people in your various threads have accused you of running the sites you are escrowing for.
I hope you can understand how a reasonable person can come to the same conclusion that I did with the facts that were available to me (and available to the public).
You already had a negative trust rating from dooglus when SNavy had agreed to use you to escrow/run their signature campaign. I do not think I have ever seen anyone accept escrow from someone when the person offering their escrow services had an overall negative trust rating. Not only that, but I did not see any kind of conversation between you and SNavy regarding the negative rating, which is something that I would expect to happen.
According to your above post, you did not receive a response and/or were rejected when you proposed running a signature campaign on behalf of 4 other companies, plus one more that I found in your PM history would make five. That means that 2 out of 7 sites agreed to use your services, which works out to a ~14% conversation rate, which IMO is extremely high for what is effectively cold calling, and the proposal you wrote was effectively an initial pitch to get their attention, not a more detailed sales pitch once they responded.
I am also not the only one who believes that you are running the two likely scam sites whose signature campaigns you are running. You have received negative trust ratings from a number of other people, and several people in your various threads have accused you of running the sites you are escrowing for.
I hope you can understand how a reasonable person can come to the same conclusion that I did with the facts that were available to me (and available to the public).
Service is Rejected by this site
Go away ponzi promoter! Everything you have said you can do is already done and to a higher standard than you could possibly do. Bye
Only one because all the other are deleted by me i deleted nearly 3 Pages which have the logs of chat.
"I was unable to find any sites/users that you were sending/receiving PM's to/from regarding your signature campaign services."
As i said all the logs are deleted
Here are the member whom i sent the message to provide my services you ask them.
Cloudthink.io (mirjangka)
PCinvest
multicryptos
luckyballs
and some more don't remember
I think may be Nascasino is also one.
"I was able to find PM's to/from the two likely scam sites that you have escrowed for"
I have sent 0.6 BTC for campaign to 1G4XVzKebjE361y5uWiG82Wpc2NzA5YSvu
What do you mean "0.13 previous pending for signature design + all my fee here"? I have sent to your address 0.07 BTC. Should I send you more? +0.13 btc or +0.06 btc?
Hello,
Its BTCBLOGGER, I usually offer Campaign management for signature campaigns.
Makes thread Look attractive with some customization.
Enroll people in the campaign and makes a New spreadsheet for them to record their each and every activity according to the campaign requirement.
Finds possible spam by going through a review of each and every member.
Checks whether the person is fulfilling the campaign requirement or Not.
and many more thing which are needed to Run a campaign easily without any problem.
Charges are very Low you can offer me any amount you Think reasonable.
Let me Know if you wants to hire me
Its BTCBLOGGER, I usually offer Campaign management for signature campaigns.
Makes thread Look attractive with some customization.
Enroll people in the campaign and makes a New spreadsheet for them to record their each and every activity according to the campaign requirement.
Finds possible spam by going through a review of each and every member.
Checks whether the person is fulfilling the campaign requirement or Not.
and many more thing which are needed to Run a campaign easily without any problem.
Charges are very Low you can offer me any amount you Think reasonable.
Let me Know if you wants to hire me
Go away ponzi promoter! Everything you have said you can do is already done and to a higher standard than you could possibly do. Bye
Only one because all the other are deleted by me i deleted nearly 3 Pages which have the logs of chat.
"I was unable to find any sites/users that you were sending/receiving PM's to/from regarding your signature campaign services."
As i said all the logs are deleted
Here are the member whom i sent the message to provide my services you ask them.
Cloudthink.io (mirjangka)
PCinvest
multicryptos
luckyballs
and some more don't remember
I think may be Nascasino is also one.
"I was able to find PM's to/from the two likely scam sites that you have escrowed for"
!!! WARNING: This user is a newbie. If you are expecting a message from a more veteran member, then this is an imposter !!!
K can I make a new thread or just use your please let me know
You can use our topic
!!! WARNING: This user is a newbie. If you are expecting a message from a more veteran member, then this is an imposter !!!
K then here is my address.
https://blockchain.info/tx/4f913c13bbef1e41fb7a8b7e4f187f6956ca762f7bd349e16a0b7886eff63a1e
0.5+0.025
Got payments!!! WARNING: This user is a newbie. If you are expecting a message from a more veteran member, then this is an imposter !!!
Great! We are ready to pay.
1ACggpLdFH9twhePpTvLwacCYh93taQZMiK i think no one will give it a chance but I can do the escrow for this and also willing to manage the campaign for only 0.025 per week or 0.1 per month and also wanted to keep your signature in my space for same rates as you are offering to others if you are ready please pm me
Great! We are ready to pay.
K then here is my address.
https://blockchain.info/tx/4f913c13bbef1e41fb7a8b7e4f187f6956ca762f7bd349e16a0b7886eff63a1e
0.5+0.025
K can I make a new thread or just use your please let me know
You can use our topic
I have sent 0.6 BTC for campaign to 1G4XVzKebjE361y5uWiG82Wpc2NzA5YSvu
What do you mean "0.13 previous pending for signature design + all my fee here"? I have sent to your address 0.07 BTC. Should I send you more? +0.13 btc or +0.06 btc?
Allegations on me by Quickseller on me I will give all the answer here asked by anyone.
"I was given access to BTCBLOGGER's account and reviewed his PM history with his permission.
Here is what I found when reviewing your PM history:
I was able to find PM's to/from the two likely scam sites that you have escrowed for. I was able to find a PM to(and from) a single site that rejected your services. Other then the above, I was unable to find any sites/users that you were sending/receiving PM's to/from regarding your signature campaign services.
I would consider you proposing your services to various sites to be similar to "cold calling" which generally has a very low "conversation" rate, and an even lower rate when you actually make contact with your potential customers. However you were able to sell your services to 66% of your prospects and made contact with 100% of your prospects. Additionally, what you were doing would likely be considered to be PM spam and as a result would likely be something that would have resulted in a ban if such PM's were reported, which is something that does not appear to have happened.
Additionally, you were able to get someone to trust you with their money after you received a negative trust rating from someone in the Default Trust network, and had a 'trade with extreme caution tag' which is highly suspicious.
I would say that the PM evidence is inclusive at best, however the evidence suggesting that you are the same person as the ponzi scams you are "escrowing" for are undebunked."
"I was given access to BTCBLOGGER's account and reviewed his PM history with his permission.
Here is what I found when reviewing your PM history:
I was able to find PM's to/from the two likely scam sites that you have escrowed for. I was able to find a PM to(and from) a single site that rejected your services. Other then the above, I was unable to find any sites/users that you were sending/receiving PM's to/from regarding your signature campaign services.
I would consider you proposing your services to various sites to be similar to "cold calling" which generally has a very low "conversation" rate, and an even lower rate when you actually make contact with your potential customers. However you were able to sell your services to 66% of your prospects and made contact with 100% of your prospects. Additionally, what you were doing would likely be considered to be PM spam and as a result would likely be something that would have resulted in a ban if such PM's were reported, which is something that does not appear to have happened.
Additionally, you were able to get someone to trust you with their money after you received a negative trust rating from someone in the Default Trust network, and had a 'trade with extreme caution tag' which is highly suspicious.
I would say that the PM evidence is inclusive at best, however the evidence suggesting that you are the same person as the ponzi scams you are "escrowing" for are undebunked."
Jump to: