This gay republican voted for the black guy - again. 
Time to lay off the meth?
Topic: I'm voting for Mitt Romney - page 2. (Read 3338 times)
Time to lay off the meth?
This gay republican voted for the black guy - again.
You're fucking retarded.
I've never heard of you but I just reviewed your posts from the entire year. Essentially, I didn't see a single post greater than a sentence long, nor did I see anything resembling intelligent discourse.
"Brevity is the soul of wit"
And he hit the nail on the head with this one. How much time did you waste going through a full years worth of posts from the dude, when you could have just smacked that ignore button and went on with your life? You'll never get that time back, you know.
I spent about 90 seconds. Vacuous commentary doesn't take long to peruse. As for hitting the nail on the head, consider:
- You suspected the Colorado shooting was faked, indicating lack of critical thinking on your part.
- You like to argue nonsensical self contradictory circles about your pet crackpot theories to no end.
- You like to stalk me in other threads.
- You've continuously demanded that I educate you about ecology, yet claim you know everything you need to know.
- Despite your demands that I educate you, you imply I'm fucking retarded right here. Touche. It is recorded in another thread in which you were stalking me that I called you a fucking retard.
You're fucking retarded.
I've never heard of you but I just reviewed your posts from the entire year. Essentially, I didn't see a single post greater than a sentence long, nor did I see anything resembling intelligent discourse.
"Brevity is the soul of wit"
And he hit the nail on the head with this one. How much time did you waste going through a full years worth of posts from the dude, when you could have just smacked that ignore button and went on with your life? You'll never get that time back, you know.
You're fucking retarded.
I've never heard of you but I just reviewed your posts from the entire year. Essentially, I didn't see a single post greater than a sentence long, nor did I see anything resembling intelligent discourse.
He had always balanced their budget
You may want to investigate how much of that budget balancing he vetoed and was subsequently overridden on.
I can honestly say that Romney doesn't know all that he should. Nor does Obama, but at least he knows how to tap into the resources of intelligent people.
Who are you referring to? John "Forced Vasectomy" Holdren?
Very Important !!!
Pre-selected Corporate Shill Lawyer A (from Harvard)
or..
Pre-selected Corporate Shill Lawyer B (from Harvard)
Pre-selected Corporate Shill Lawyer A (from Harvard)
or..
Pre-selected Corporate Shill Lawyer B (from Harvard)
Mitt Romney like most politicians is a backstabbing and back talking cunt that reminds me of a lot of people in school I used to know, hard to believe people would vote for such a moron, they say nice things to your face but the moment they get what they want they'll screw you over and the two party system is full of those types.
You're fucking retarded.
Being a successful business man means nothing with regard to being President.
Grasp this fact: businesses are small entities within a much larger context. The United States is, essentially, the context.
Let me say it in a different way. Businesses operate within an interior space, and can always find more in the much larger exterior space outside. A large nation is the exterior space, and can't necessarily find an even larger exterior space to draw from. Granted, you might analogize other nations to being the even larger exterior space, and even outer space, but these boundaries and walls are much more difficult to scale.
I can honestly say that Romney doesn't know all that he should. Nor does Obama, but at least he knows how to tap into the resources of intelligent people. I don't believe Romney would choose intelligent people, except for the way he sees things from his narrow vision of how things work.
Grasp this fact: businesses are small entities within a much larger context. The United States is, essentially, the context.
Let me say it in a different way. Businesses operate within an interior space, and can always find more in the much larger exterior space outside. A large nation is the exterior space, and can't necessarily find an even larger exterior space to draw from. Granted, you might analogize other nations to being the even larger exterior space, and even outer space, but these boundaries and walls are much more difficult to scale.
I can honestly say that Romney doesn't know all that he should. Nor does Obama, but at least he knows how to tap into the resources of intelligent people. I don't believe Romney would choose intelligent people, except for the way he sees things from his narrow vision of how things work.
Great, this will be like hiring a former pimp to teach home economics to girls at the local middle school, based on his track record of success and fiscal discipline shown while he was engaged in pimping.
Don't be a player hater. Vote Romney?
Gary Johnson balanced the New Mexico budget without raising taxes and firing a single state worker, leaving a billion dollar surplus. Tomorrow, I won't be voting for the so-called "fiscal conservative" (who will have a bigger budget than Obama in the first year and won't balance the budget in his presidency), I will be voting for the budget magician who also cares about personal liberties and peaceful foreign policy.
This may be the smartest thing I've ever seen from you.
Looking at Romney's record, Every single organization he managed, be it a multi-billion dollar company, a major sporting event or a large State. He had always balanced their budget, and it was always rising from a state of huge deficit. I trust Romney's excellent record. Therefore I'm voting Mitt Romney tomorrow.
So what is his plan? I see no way out that anyone will like. Plus balancing the budget isn't even the president's job.
I think we need Clinton back. Now that hes too old to get caught up in the "scandals" of his previous term, he can spend more time working on what he did right. Well, that is unless he has viagra...
Ugh, no. His policies enacted to back bad housing loans with government funds caused the housing bubble (and subsequent crash). That's how it always is with the Dem's - looking at the surface, never seeing the consequences down the road.Caught it before I did. Not to mention cruise missiles and entanglements.
But surely it isn't a Democratic problem , if anything the disease that festers in our government is bipartisan. Just look at the "debates" between less than half of the people running. Media collusion creates a restricted environment for discourse intentionally, designed to propagate specific narratives in the political sphere.
I think we need Clinton back. Now that hes too old to get caught up in the "scandals" of his previous term, he can spend more time working on what he did right. Well, that is unless he has viagra...
Ugh, no. His policies enacted to back bad housing loans with government funds caused the housing bubble (and subsequent crash). That's how it always is with the Dem's - looking at the surface, never seeing the consequences down the road. 
I think we need Clinton back. Now that hes too old to get caught up in the "scandals" of his previous term, he can spend more time working on what he did right. Well, that is unless he has viagra...
Gary Johnson balanced the New Mexico budget without raising taxes and firing a single state worker, leaving a billion dollar surplus. Tomorrow, I won't be voting for the so-called "fiscal conservative" (who will have a bigger budget than Obama in the first year and won't balance the budget in his presidency), I will be voting for the budget magician who also cares about personal liberties and peaceful foreign policy.
tbh i think the united states is screwed again, bush for 8 years running shit down the drain, obama going back on everything he promissed
and then you lost ron paul.... probably the only person since jfk to make any sense...
but hey, most western countrys are turning in to police states on welfare...
and then you lost ron paul.... probably the only person since jfk to make any sense...
but hey, most western countrys are turning in to police states on welfare...
What is a 16 trillion dollar debt compared to 900 trillion in weaponized rehypothecated financial instruments used to finance wars, destroy national economies (including the USA), and impoverish families? Neither of them is going to do anything about this. The way I see it, Obama will help the sick, old, and poor die with some comfort, but Romney will cause bloodshed in the streets by pushing the poor to outright insurgency and guerrilla warfare. There are a lot of pissed off veterans nowadays much like Timothy McVeigh.
Jump to: