Diamond, why don't you start with an analysis of the 200 posts in the thread I started. There are many many good points in there.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/seeking-a-team-to-develop-bitcointalk-20-forums-apply-within-244678
Topic: [IN PROGRESS] A new Bitcoin forum. Design paper finished. - page 2. (Read 4165 times)
Censoring NEEDS to be done. In the case of crumbcake...
He posted an off-topic response which was little more than an ad hominem attack more than 700 times in a few threads I started. He needed to be censored and then banned, which he was. The next day he re-appeared as a new avatar named crumbs and he is still here today.
There must be censorship and moderation, otherwise a forum becomes impossible to navigate. But censorship only against freedom of speech is lame.
He posted an off-topic response which was little more than an ad hominem attack more than 700 times in a few threads I started. He needed to be censored and then banned, which he was. The next day he re-appeared as a new avatar named crumbs and he is still here today.
There must be censorship and moderation, otherwise a forum becomes impossible to navigate. But censorship only against freedom of speech is lame.
Good point.
Edited the Design paper again.
Censoring NEEDS to be done. In the case of crumbcake...
He posted an off-topic response which was little more than an ad hominem attack more than 700 times in a few threads I started. He needed to be censored and then banned, which he was. The next day he re-appeared as a new avatar named crumbs and he is still here today.
There must be censorship and moderation, otherwise a forum becomes impossible to navigate. But censorship only against freedom of speech is lame.
He posted an off-topic response which was little more than an ad hominem attack more than 700 times in a few threads I started. He needed to be censored and then banned, which he was. The next day he re-appeared as a new avatar named crumbs and he is still here today.
There must be censorship and moderation, otherwise a forum becomes impossible to navigate. But censorship only against freedom of speech is lame.
Seriously? You just removed a post that critisised something? I see you're all in for "no censorship"
No, I removed the post because you didn't read anything I said in CoinChat, or in the post above, or in the OP. Also, you have a new PM that I see you're ignoring.
Criticizing it? Nah, you're trying to shit on me. I wanted to record who wanted to use the forum, that's what I'm doing.
LOL, that's censoring!!
I don't define deleting annoying or trolling posts as censoring.
TBH, Boelens doesn't like me and I don't like him, most of his arguments are purely so that he can annoy me or try to bash me.
This might be the exact reason why people like MNW are banned (he was handpicked from the group of trolls to be banned due trolling).
It's all about personal relations and right now you are doing the censoring because of personal relation. There's no much point for you to talk about non-censoring forums anymore, right? It just doesn't work this way.
Please tell me more about how I censor people. I deleted 1 post because the poster ignored my messages in a chatroom, (is still ignoring my PM,) didn't read my post on why I changed it, and because the poster bashes me due to personal relations.
Seriously? You just removed a post that critisised something? I see you're all in for "no censorship"
No, I removed the post because you didn't read anything I said in CoinChat, or in the post above, or in the OP. Also, you have a new PM that I see you're ignoring.
Criticizing it? Nah, you're trying to shit on me. I wanted to record who wanted to use the forum, that's what I'm doing.
LOL, that's censoring!!
I don't define deleting annoying or trolling posts as censoring.
TBH, Boelens doesn't like me and I don't like him, most of his arguments are purely so that he can annoy me or try to bash me.
This might be the exact reason why people like MNW are banned (he was handpicked from the group of trolls to be banned due trolling).
It's all about personal relations and right now you are doing the censoring because of personal relation. There's no much point for you to talk about non-censoring forums anymore, right? It just doesn't work this way.
Seriously? You just removed a post that critisised something? I see you're all in for "no censorship"
No, I removed the post because you didn't read anything I said in CoinChat, or in the post above, or in the OP. Also, you have a new PM that I see you're ignoring.
Criticizing it? Nah, you're trying to shit on me. I wanted to record who wanted to use the forum, that's what I'm doing.
LOL, that's censoring!!
I don't define deleting annoying or trolling posts as censoring.
TBH, Boelens doesn't like me and I don't like him, most of his arguments are purely so that he can annoy me or try to bash me.
Yeah how about no?
Forums are not meant to be playgrounds of kids. Stuff like "after three strikes, moderator loses his moderation powers"...
I think there's no real reason to start new forums since bitcointalk.org is fine, atleast for now.
Forums are not meant to be playgrounds of kids. Stuff like "after three strikes, moderator loses his moderation powers"...
I think there's no real reason to start new forums since bitcointalk.org is fine, atleast for now.
If you think so.
Listen - I have nothing against you and I don't know where you got the idea from that I dislike you. I'm not making these arguments so I can annoy or bash you, I make enough arguments on many posts, and I don't care how well I know that person.
I do remember you saying that you don't like me, actually.
Seriously? You just removed a post that critisised something? I see you're all in for "no censorship"
No, I removed the post because you didn't read anything I said in CoinChat, or in the post above, or in the OP. Also, you have a new PM that I see you're ignoring.
Criticizing it? Nah, you're trying to shit on me. I wanted to record who wanted to use the forum, that's what I'm doing.
LOL, that's censoring!!
I don't define deleting annoying or trolling posts as censoring.
TBH, Boelens doesn't like me and I don't like him, most of his arguments are purely so that he can annoy me or try to bash me.
Yeah how about no?
Forums are not meant to be playgrounds of kids. Stuff like "after three strikes, moderator loses his moderation powers"...
I think there's no real reason to start new forums since bitcointalk.org is fine, atleast for now.
Forums are not meant to be playgrounds of kids. Stuff like "after three strikes, moderator loses his moderation powers"...
I think there's no real reason to start new forums since bitcointalk.org is fine, atleast for now.
If you think so.
Listen - I have nothing against you and I don't know where you got the idea from that I dislike you. I'm not making these arguments so I can annoy or bash you, I make enough arguments on many posts, and I don't care how well I know that person.
Seriously? You just removed a post that critisised something? I see you're all in for "no censorship"
No, I removed the post because you didn't read anything I said in CoinChat, or in the post above, or in the OP. Also, you have a new PM that I see you're ignoring.
Criticizing it? Nah, you're trying to shit on me. I wanted to record who wanted to use the forum, that's what I'm doing.
LOL, that's censoring!!
I don't define deleting annoying or trolling posts as censoring.
TBH, Boelens doesn't like me and I don't like him, most of his arguments are purely so that he can annoy me or try to bash me.
Yeah how about no?
Forums are not meant to be playgrounds of kids. Stuff like "after three strikes, moderator loses his moderation powers"...
I think there's no real reason to start new forums since bitcointalk.org is fine, atleast for now.
Forums are not meant to be playgrounds of kids. Stuff like "after three strikes, moderator loses his moderation powers"...
I think there's no real reason to start new forums since bitcointalk.org is fine, atleast for now.
If you think so.
Seriously? You just removed a post that critisised something? I see you're all in for "no censorship"
No, I removed the post because you didn't read anything I said in CoinChat, or in the post above, or in the OP. Also, you have a new PM that I see you're ignoring.
Criticizing it? Nah, you're trying to shit on me. I wanted to record who wanted to use the forum, that's what I'm doing.
LOL, that's censoring!!
Yeah how about no?
Forums are not meant to be playgrounds of kids. Stuff like "after three strikes, moderator loses his moderation powers"...
I think there's no real reason to start new forums since bitcointalk.org is fine, atleast for now.
Forums are not meant to be playgrounds of kids. Stuff like "after three strikes, moderator loses his moderation powers"...
I think there's no real reason to start new forums since bitcointalk.org is fine, atleast for now.
Seriously? You just removed a post that critisised something? I see you're all in for "no censorship"
No, I removed the post because you didn't read anything I said in CoinChat, or in the post above, or in the OP. Also, you have a new PM that I see you're ignoring.
Criticizing it? Nah, you're trying to shit on me. I wanted to record who wanted to use the forum, that's what I'm doing.
Seriously? You just removed a post that critisised something? I see you're all in for "no censorship"
Considering all the votes for "--- blank ---", I have now changed it to "^ this", so that we get some real data (i.e who wants to support the new forum).
In the drug adverting section you need to remove the cannabis restriction. Cannabis is now fully legal in many parts of the world.
True. Removed.
In the drug adverting section you need to remove the cannabis restriction. Cannabis is now fully legal in many parts of the world.
2 people voted for blank. 
7 people have given the project a vote of confidence so far.
Oh yeah, I forgot, I need to add to the small list of forum rules that account trading isn't allowed, because it results in loads of scamming.
7 people have given the project a vote of confidence so far.
Oh yeah, I forgot, I need to add to the small list of forum rules that account trading isn't allowed, because it results in loads of scamming.
Bitcointalk = Shady.
BFL = Shady.
Time to get a new forum that is not shady.
Make sure that power is not given to 1 person.
People are rotated in and out of positions of power.
Shared resource.
BFL = Shady.
Time to get a new forum that is not shady.
Make sure that power is not given to 1 person.
People are rotated in and out of positions of power.
Shared resource.
I confirm that I have DiamondCardz':
He will also send me a pic of him showing this data as soon as he can
Code:
Name
Address
Picture
Screenshot of BitMit with his address
He will also send me a pic of him showing this data as soon as he can
The top 500 members, based on post count, would be given a vote on who would become a new moderator
Say goodbye to democracy.
BUT I will support the forum, no funding, sorry
But management, helping it set up, moderating, I can all do. Hopefully this works out and I'll try and join as fast as I can You're already thinking of donator ranks and stuff... You should start small then go towards the cash island. Starting out big won't do you any good, I wouldn't want to buy a rank when there are only like 100 members
Goodbye to democracy? Ehhhh, it's better than me just cherry-picking all of the mods and admins because I like them.
It's better to plan ahead.
Also, I have provided jackjack with my dox, so that he can release it if I scam (or do something along those lines).
Quote
The top 500 members, based on post count, would be given a vote on who would become a new moderator
Say goodbye to democracy.
BUT I will support the forum, no funding, sorry
But management, helping it set up, moderating, I can all do. Hopefully this works out and I'll try and join as fast as I can You're already thinking of donator ranks and stuff... You should start small then go towards the cash island. Starting out big won't do you any good, I wouldn't want to buy a rank when there are only like 100 members
Jump to: