Jalapeno was delivered this morning, for what it's worth. Order date of Jan 31st, US customer.
https://i.imgur.com/r0KKzx2.jpg
Topic: Inaba (Josh BFL ) Please pay your debt - Moderators,please take action! (Read 4526 times)
August 28, 2013, 01:07:14 PM
August 27, 2013, 08:47:10 PM
Tracking updated on my package. It was mailed 2 day priority (i didnt pay for the faster shipping) . Also was sent insured to $50 and with signature confirmation.
August 27, 2013, 11:32:45 AM
Where's the 1000 BTC to charity Josh?
Are you referring to this?
https://forums.butterflylabs.com/content/134-butterfly-labs-donates-1000-btc-charity-bitcoin-related-projects.html
First, BitcoinDF is not a charity, so there has been no 1000 btc donation to charity by BFL. Only a fraction of the BitcoinDF funds have actually been donated to charity.
Second, no, I'm referring to the quote I posted, where Josh personally offers 1000 btc to charity. Here, I'll post it again.
I am offering up a guarantee of 1000 BTC to charity (I will take suggestions on which charity to donate this to) if BFL does not meet it's power claims within 10% - meaning if BFL's power consumption is more than 66w for a Single SC, we lose the "bet."
BFL donating some btc to charity doesn't fulfil Josh's promise.
August 27, 2013, 01:50:38 AM
Where's the 1000 BTC to charity Josh?
Are you referring to this?
https://forums.butterflylabs.com/content/134-butterfly-labs-donates-1000-btc-charity-bitcoin-related-projects.html
August 26, 2013, 08:44:27 PM
Still waiting on that proof of your as yet unsubstantiated accusations. You wouldn't have been lying, would you? Why haven't you provided any proof?
Where's the 1000 BTC to charity Josh?
I am offering up a guarantee of 1000 BTC to charity (I will take suggestions on which charity to donate this to) if BFL does not meet it's power claims within 10% - meaning if BFL's power consumption is more than 66w for a Single SC, we lose the "bet."
August 26, 2013, 08:41:15 PM
omg no way really? never would'a guessed.
Still waiting on that proof of your as yet unsubstantiated accusations. You wouldn't have been lying, would you? Why haven't you provided any proof?
August 26, 2013, 07:43:56 PM
And once again Josh is silent on the matter.
He claimed in another thread that Runeks and he worked out a deal. But none of that was ever made public nor publicly confirmed by Runeks.
Is it a surprise that when Josh is actually asked to back up his MOUTH with actual money that he refuses to? Not really. Just look at the business practices of where he works currently.
He claimed in another thread that Runeks and he worked out a deal. But none of that was ever made public nor publicly confirmed by Runeks.
Is it a surprise that when Josh is actually asked to back up his MOUTH with actual money that he refuses to? Not really. Just look at the business practices of where he works currently.
Code:
The burden of proof lies with someone who is making a claim,
and is not upon anyone else to prove the negative. The inability, or disinclination,
to disprove a claim does not render that claim valid, nor give it any credence whatsoever.
The example of not being able to disprove a teapot in orbit serves to illustrate how any
claim, no matter how absurd, could be validated if this faulty logic was accepted.
and is not upon anyone else to prove the negative. The inability, or disinclination,
to disprove a claim does not render that claim valid, nor give it any credence whatsoever.
The example of not being able to disprove a teapot in orbit serves to illustrate how any
claim, no matter how absurd, could be validated if this faulty logic was accepted.
Again he made the claim so he has the burden of proof. Without it he is a liar.
Josh Zerlan, COO, of BFL is a LIAR!
omg no way really? never would'a guessed.
August 26, 2013, 07:18:47 PM
And once again Josh is silent on the matter.
He claimed in another thread that Runeks and he worked out a deal. But none of that was ever made public nor publicly confirmed by Runeks.
Is it a surprise that when Josh is actually asked to back up his MOUTH with actual money that he refuses to? Not really. Just look at the business practices of where he works currently.
He claimed in another thread that Runeks and he worked out a deal. But none of that was ever made public nor publicly confirmed by Runeks.
Is it a surprise that when Josh is actually asked to back up his MOUTH with actual money that he refuses to? Not really. Just look at the business practices of where he works currently.
Code:
The burden of proof lies with someone who is making a claim,
and is not upon anyone else to prove the negative. The inability, or disinclination,
to disprove a claim does not render that claim valid, nor give it any credence whatsoever.
The example of not being able to disprove a teapot in orbit serves to illustrate how any
claim, no matter how absurd, could be validated if this faulty logic was accepted.
Again he made the claim so he has the burden of proof. Without it he is a liar.
Josh Zerlan, COO, of BFL is a LIAR!
August 26, 2013, 05:10:22 PM
Received the tracking number email today. Marked shipped on Thursday 8/22 within BFL's system, label printed Monday 8/26, and has yet to be mailed out (no check-in/origin scan from USPS as of yet).
August 26, 2013, 10:15:13 AM
And once again Josh is silent on the matter.
He claimed in another thread that Runeks and he worked out a deal. But none of that was ever made public nor publicly confirmed by Runeks.
Is it a surprise that when Josh is actually asked to back up his MOUTH with actual money that he refuses to? Not really. Just look at the business practices of where he works currently.
He claimed in another thread that Runeks and he worked out a deal. But none of that was ever made public nor publicly confirmed by Runeks.
Is it a surprise that when Josh is actually asked to back up his MOUTH with actual money that he refuses to? Not really. Just look at the business practices of where he works currently.
Code:
The burden of proof lies with someone who is making a claim,
and is not upon anyone else to prove the negative. The inability, or disinclination,
to disprove a claim does not render that claim valid, nor give it any credence whatsoever.
The example of not being able to disprove a teapot in orbit serves to illustrate how any
claim, no matter how absurd, could be validated if this faulty logic was accepted.
Again he made the claim so he has the burden of proof. Without it he is a liar.
August 26, 2013, 09:53:14 AM
And once again Josh is silent on the matter.
He claimed in another thread that Runeks and he worked out a deal. But none of that was ever made public nor publicly confirmed by Runeks.
Is it a surprise that when Josh is actually asked to back up his MOUTH with actual money that he refuses to? Not really. Just look at the business practices of where he works currently.
He claimed in another thread that Runeks and he worked out a deal. But none of that was ever made public nor publicly confirmed by Runeks.
Is it a surprise that when Josh is actually asked to back up his MOUTH with actual money that he refuses to? Not really. Just look at the business practices of where he works currently.
August 26, 2013, 08:23:46 AM
Are people getting what they paid for? Yes.
Can you point to any customer that has received a USB-power Jalapeno?
Shipping products that don't meet paid-for specs: Scammer.
Lying about shipping dates: Scammer.
Refusing refunds: Scammer.
Failing to pay lost bets: Scammer.
See you in 2014.
August 26, 2013, 01:21:09 AM
Are people getting what they paid for? Yes.
Can you point to any customer that has received a USB-power Jalapeno?
Shipping products that don't meet paid-for specs: Scammer.
Lying about shipping dates: Scammer.
Refusing refunds: Scammer.
Failing to pay lost bets: Scammer.
See you in 2014.
Snapppp!
Oh no you just didn't.
August 25, 2013, 08:57:58 PM
Are people getting what they paid for? Yes.
Can you point to any customer that has received a USB-power Jalapeno?
Shipping products that don't meet paid-for specs: Scammer.
Lying about shipping dates: Scammer.
Refusing refunds: Scammer.
Failing to pay lost bets: Scammer.
See you in 2014.
August 25, 2013, 05:18:55 PM
Are people getting what they paid for? Yes.
Can you point to any customer that has received a USB-power Jalapeno?
Shipping products that don't meet paid-for specs: Scammer.
Lying about shipping dates: Scammer.
Refusing refunds: Scammer.
Failing to pay lost bets: Scammer.
August 25, 2013, 01:29:04 PM
Penis Gauge, are you really going around stealing funds from Bitcoin100?!?! Our esteemed leader, best member of bitcointalk for 2013, Inaba, said so...
August 25, 2013, 01:25:12 PM
Red_Wolf_2, are you going around...
August 25, 2013, 10:50:53 AM
Scammer and a liar.
Bicknellski, are you going around necroing every single anti-bfl (or related) thread you can find? Seriously, its kinda annoying as it fills all the forums up with out of date crap.
August 25, 2013, 09:26:28 AM
No Fizban, Josh needs to also pay his bet with Runeks once the 24 hours test of one of the delivered Jalapeños is completed.
1000 BTC to Runeks. https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/a-bfl-asic-1000-btc-bet-that-looks-like-inaba-lost-191600
The charity 1000BTC is completely different.
1000 BTC to Runeks. https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/a-bfl-asic-1000-btc-bet-that-looks-like-inaba-lost-191600
The charity 1000BTC is completely different.
Better idea: BFL should get together with MtGox to make the Bitcoin Scam Foundation.
Oh snap.
Are you saying...
Inaba = Shady.
BFL = Shady.
MtGox = Shady.
Bitcoin Foundation = Shady.
Ouch.
And then we can get the Bitcoin Scam Foundation to donate to
Oh sn-h-apples.
August 25, 2013, 03:41:55 AM
No Fizban, Josh needs to also pay his bet with Runeks once the 24 hours test of one of the delivered Jalapeños is completed.
1000 BTC to Runeks. https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/a-bfl-asic-1000-btc-bet-that-looks-like-inaba-lost-191600
The charity 1000BTC is completely different.
1000 BTC to Runeks. https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/a-bfl-asic-1000-btc-bet-that-looks-like-inaba-lost-191600
The charity 1000BTC is completely different.
Better idea: BFL should get together with MtGox to make the Bitcoin Scam Foundation.
Oh snap.
Are you saying...
Inaba = Shady.
BFL = Shady.
MtGox = Shady.
Bitcoin Foundation = Shady.
Ouch.
Jump to: