Topic: India as a developed country by 2047 (Read 434 times)

In my opinion India has great potential to become a developed country in 25 years, of course this will change the map of world economic power so that it becomes more colorful, Europe has been lagging behind and facing economic recession so that India's opportunity to become a developed country can certainly be easily reached in 25 years.

I think it is natural that in 2047 or 25 years from now India will become a developed country, they are supported by many things to become a developed country, many students are studying in many European and American countries and the education budget will continue to be increased so it is appropriate that when they are 100 years independent they will become developed countries.

Based on current statistics I don't India is more populated than China. Maybe you are talking about current population growth based on the birth rate. Just like China, the population of India can be used as an economic advantage. Cheap labor is one of the cardinal factors that attract investors to China and India can equally achieve the same feat. India's population can become an advantage if they are educated and empowered with appropriate skills. India has a high number of out-of-school children and most schools face so many infrastructural challenges. 

Compared to so many countries, India is not doing badly economically and that country has the potential to become a developed country by 2047 if its population becomes more educated and skillful.     

There is some good news finally:

https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/fertility-rate-declined-by-20-in-india-in-10-years-srs-data/articleshow/94464169.cms

The fertility rate across India now stands at 2.0, compared to 3.6 in 1991. Overpopulation still remains a big issue in India, and there is large variation across different states. And the birth rate (19.5 per 1,000) is almost twice that of western nations.

This fall in birth rate will probably translate to greater economic growth and more accessibility to resources.

1. Regarding the revolution, nothing gave Iran - it's just your statement, not supported by anything. Let's connect argems, backed up by facts and verifiable figures? I believe that the indicators of improvements were, and it's easy to check:
- economic development
- attraction of investments
- opening markets
- getting the opportunity to receive a quality education in Western educational institutions
- The status of a country with an actively developing economy
- increase in the standard of living of the population
- freedom
- the absence of strict legislation restricting the rights and freedoms of a person, based on radical Islamism

It seems to me that this is much more attractive than what happened in Iran later ...


2. "I read George Orwell's Animal Farm when I was 8 years old. I'm not a socialist (I believe in a free market economy), but if they make me choose between fascists and socialists, I will choose socialists."
There was no socialism in the USSR, there was red terror, which subsided a little over time, but the repressive system remained at the heart of the state. This was not socialism. It's kind of like war communism. And having made the wrong choice, you are trying to give an example where the choice will be absolutely logical. It's like saying "if I'm offered shit or cheesecake, I'll heroically choose cheesecake." The question can be formulated as follows 6 that you choose fascism or rashism?
I will answer - a normal person with such a choice (fascism or rashism) will not choose either one or the other. Choosing from two evils, you will choose EVIL anyway!


3. "You accuse me of something I didn't say. I think our conversation should end here because I don't want to act like you. Thank you. I should also add that the Taliban are more likely to improve than the colonialists. Lesser evil...
"- no need to twist I'm not saying that you said it, I made the example of your choice more contrasting. You consider the change of the totalitarian regime an evil! "The bourgeois revolution carried out by a few lucky ones in Iran did not give anything to the Iranian people. On the contrary, the wealth belonging to the Iranian people was transferred to other collaborationist bourgeois revolutionaries" - are these your words or am I saying something for you?
Well, about the lesser evil - see p.p. 2, there is already an answer to this question

Every leader has an ambition to its country but Narendra Modi is different, he is very very ambitious and aggressive for India's development. I remember when he just started office, he was setting goals after goals and one of them that caught me by surprise was his plan to send a satellite in space and later a mission to the moon. Modi served long enough that means that many Indians like him. But I am also surprised by the post that Bangladesh until now has higher per capita than India.

Maybe for the country of India to be prosperous, the majority of the politicians in your government should care about your country. Your politicians should have a good program not only for the economy but also for the constituents that your government governs there.

And when that happens, I'm sure your economy will gradually rise and there will be a change in your country. As long as your government leaders are not corrupt, your country is not far from being like Japan, Singapore, and others.

Anyway, happy independence to your country.

The increase in population, such as in India, must also be considered by the government because if it escapes the attention of the government, then the development and the factors needed will be very difficult to build and achieve in conditions like now. India is not so far behind the developing countries or the newly developed countries that it is still easier for India to see other countries that are already developed and also start a better development at this time


From a business and economic point of view, India has that and is still doing very well at the moment so the development will probably be there and it won't take too long for India to make it happen if all businesses and sectors of the economy are always alive.

The hard truth, the government will announce such schemes and later if they feel the scheme is profiting people they'll make changes to the scheme. I don't know how far this is true, but it had a good connect. Recently the usage of electric vehicles increased, but India got an opportunity to buy oil at a much lower price. To profit out of it, there were more and more electric vehicles getting into firing problems. The buying of electric vehicles decreased and the fuel usage increased. So, someway government wants money and for the same they'll do all cheap tactics.

This is a clever observation, we know that first world countries consume way more resources than the rest of the nations, if India was able to develop at the speed which is projected then it's fair to wonder how many resources they'll consume? Can the world even support the demands of so many people? So assuming India is able to reach that goal it would be interesting to see how they deal with such a huge problem.

I hope this would be realized but for now, it was uncertain.
Honestly, it was too hard to imagine what gonna happen 25 years from now, I can't even see it in the crystal ball. I don't want to think negatively in regards to the future of crypto in India but can't hide the doubts as well. Because without the support from the government, business groups, and the community, this way impossible to happen. For now, it was unrealistic but whispering good luck.

This is like a necessity for every nation that wants to increase their GDP and economic status. I think political development should be added to this because it's only where every other development gets implemented and maintained

Does reduction in wealth inequality really count. Paying more attention in improving the various sector of their economy should be more considered and also ensure good accountability of every public funds allocated for projects.

Investing in foreign investment and youth development. I don't see job creation as a major concern. In a society where the youths are empowered with trending technologies it will attract investments and development

My opinion First with assumptions about the population. India's population is increasing. The population is twice that of China. Therefore, its need for earth's resources will increase in the coming years. So obviously India is not as developed as it is now keeping these factors in mind. It may take almost 80-100 years to reach developed countries seeing its current development.

Yes. India needs more foreign businesses to set up in India to save the country's economy and more foreign investment to raise money for their infrastructure.

The thing that slows a country from developing to developed is corruption...

India is one of the countries with the largest population in the world and its citizens are spread in almost all countries but human resources in India are still low because corruption is still high (just like my country), developed countries have clean governments and are far from corruption, that clearly distinguishes that developed countries have luck because their leaders are not greedy.

Being an Indian, here are my concerns:

1. Only around 1.5% of the population pays income tax. Salaried class is heavily taxed and almost everyone is deep in debt.
2. A large part of the population lives off freebies. Stop the freebies and the government will go down.
3. Caste and religion are important factors when people go out to vote. Merit of the candidate seldom matters.
4. Population explosion is a big concern. In a democracy, groups that increase their population ends up with more power.
5. India imports almost everything, including hydrocarbons, electronics and defense equipment.

India is the 3rd largest economy in the world in terms of purchasing power parity, and the 5th largest economy in the world, and the top 10 holders of forex reserves. India is part of the G20, global economic decision making. India's quota has been increased by WB and the IMF. Because this growth, development, and size are different, the economy is growing fast, so it will increase the size of the economy. India's development, so we expect to become a developed country in the future.

India has enormous human resources, so that major developments in the field of education will have a tremendous impact on the country. On the other hand, if public health becomes a major concern as well, there will be more and more productive people, who have high self-awareness in maintaining cleanliness, and ultimately have a high level of health. especially if it is supported by adequate infrastructure, of course it will further reduce production costs

This is great, but there is one thing that comes to mind for us as non-Indians. Where we see social inequality, the caste problem in India which makes social, economic, and cultural inequalities in certain religions will continue to stick where the three castes in India have a limited influence on an economy. I certainly want to know how the government handles culture. Because after all, India has the largest population in the world. Based on Wikipedia sources, India's biggest challenges are still in the sector of gender inequality, child malnutrition, and rising levels of air pollution. The land of India is very diverse, with four biodiversity hotspots. Its forest cover covers 21.7% of its area.

For any country struggles are always part of growth. With the kind of population India has. I think achieving per capita income to the level of developed countries will be a great challenge. However I think Indians focus on education very much and it has helped them a lot. They will keep growing and they might achieve the infrastructure similar to a developed economy, however it's per capita income might not reach to the level of developed countries.

Being an Indian, I am quite skeptical about the chances of India. The biggest problem facing India right now is overpopulation. Population growth has slowed down in most of the states. But 2-3 states which contribute the most to the population (Bihar, UP.etc) still have very high growth rates. This results in very heavy migration from these states to other states and as a result there is a lot of ethnic tension. And the second major issue is brain drain. Every year, some 100,000 to 150,000 of the most qualified people emigrate outside. Main reasons are sky high tax rates and lack of safety within India. India can't become a developed nation, unless these issues are resolved.