Topic: Influence of bounty - page 5. (Read 899 times)
Influence of bounty hunters can't be underestimated, using bounty hunters for promotions is cheaper and that is reason why many team go for it than using a marketing company, i disagree with you that bounty doesn't influence project positively.
yes it still depend on how well the ICO / PROJECT known to others, some bounty program are tend to make a community
Well, everything depends of course on the team, if the team is known and has already achieved success in cryptocurrency, then I think the bounty is not necessary, such projects collect a lot of money during the ico
Of course, bounty alone will not be able to pull out a project, but as a component of more global marketing it is very useful tool. And the projects themselves determine how they better promote the project and whether it is worth spending time and energy on bounties.
I think bounty influence is huge in any project because it provides necessary publicity necessary for the growth of a project
Even established projects also conduct bounty programs to further make their selves known and also to trend and advertise the greatness of their platform
Even established projects also conduct bounty programs to further make their selves known and also to trend and advertise the greatness of their platform
If the team of a project is unable to to create enough hype around their own ICO, the bounty hunters will dump the token price directly after the first listing. The teams should pay bounty hunters with Bitcoin or Ethereum to avoid such things.
Bounties are typically 1 or 2 per cent of the entire float. If your coin can't handle 1 or 2 percent of your coins being sold after it gets listed then you have done a very poor job of convincing people about your project. Most dumping is actually done by people who bought in at a steep discount during the private or presale. I have seen discounts of 30% to 90% offered to early investors with no hold period. 
Practice is shoving that even good bounty cannot save dead project. Good practive not is launching boutny program after reaching exchanges.
Many project comes without bounty success and the project with bounty didn't, why? Bounty participant only give hype of the project not giving any contribution to the product development. after the hype is build then many people comes to buy after the got the money the development will go slowly.
The success of a project depends mainly on the team and the idea of the project, the bounty will not affect too much on the success of a project.
Top quality projects doesn't do bounty or doing very limited one.
Last year bounties were working awareness brought lots of funds. This year it doesn't work because no-one have anything to invest.
He is right.. Now, successful ICO is not depends on bounty because a lot of ICO is coming day by day.. bounty participant is increased and i think investor is reduced cause a lot of scam of ICO.. Last year bounties were working awareness brought lots of funds. This year it doesn't work because no-one have anything to invest.
Top quality projects doesn't do bounty or doing very limited one.
Last year bounties were working awareness brought lots of funds. This year it doesn't work because no-one have anything to invest.
Last year bounties were working awareness brought lots of funds. This year it doesn't work because no-one have anything to invest.
this certainly has a connection, the project that was built without ico was a project that would not last long, because from ico there was usually a wider promotion to be introduced to a number of people, but those who failed could be because they did not get good sales.
sometimes even without a bounty campaign they can succeed, that's right. But in my opinion the existence of a bounty campaign can help a project to become more widely known in the larger crypto community.
-Snip-
The success of a project is depend on its nature. Marketing or bounty campaign is just a part of this success. If they fail at the begining - project's concept, they cannot succeed though they have the support of millions of bounty hunters.
Some projects didnt go through a bounty and yet they became successful.
Its just a norm nowadays that bounty is a good part to expose their projects with the help of thousands of bounty hunters.
Its just a norm nowadays that bounty is a good part to expose their projects with the help of thousands of bounty hunters.
If the team of a project is unable to to create enough hype around their own ICO, the bounty hunters will dump the token price directly after the first listing. The teams should pay bounty hunters with Bitcoin or Ethereum to avoid such things.
You are right, the initial cryptocurrency projects have almost no ICO phase, because they know very well that they can help the market and investors create more business opportunities, such as ETH.XRP. But now that the ICO project has changed, the main reason they created encryption is to raise money, most of which is privately owned rather than used for development projects.
I agree that not all projects need a bounty campaign and not all need an ICO. it all depends on the ratings and capabilities of the project and the team. if the team is already known in the crypto community and showed the results, then they do not need to launch a bounty campaign
Does it really matter? Will a project die without a bounty? It is a big fat lie ,many projects/coins never mind releasing bounty program and the coins still exist with good followers and good price ,Sam goes to ICO ,do you believe that a project can survive without ICO? Yes ,many has done that and they are doing better than ICO ones ,even newer projects, influence of a bounty on a project doesn't mean it will be successful ,many has failed already
Jump to: