Thank you for that. Sincerely.
I think it should be pointed out here that there is a vast difference between fraud on the one hand, and running afoul of the regulator's restrictions upon exercising the right to contract on the other. Stealing people's holdings through a ponzi scheme is a vastly different thing than crowdfunding a new business (Isn't the mere selling of shares in SatoshiDice the thrust of regulators against Voorhees?).
I hear you, but you can't wake the beast and expect it to sleep until you're ready for it. Shavers ran an illegal security. Voorhees ran an illegal security. Just because Shavers wasn't crafty enough to return a bulk of the funds to investors right before he was caught doesn't make his crime different. It just means Voorhees was more crafty than Shavers and had a better legal team.
The difference between Shavers and Voorhees is a matter of semantics. They were both selling unregistered securities. Shavers became a Ponzi when he failed to return at least a bulk of the money. Voorhees was bright enough to get legal advise. I think they should have gone after him for FeedZeBirds too. He's obviously got a great legal team. Where's the 2,600 Bitcoins for FeedZeBirds Erik?
Yeah that is a bit like poking a bear. A little foresight could have prevented a lot of problems.