I did read his posts and he stated that the funding would go to one coin not with majority to one and some to all the others.
So I dont think that was "left open"
hence why I said there should be no voting. this is Frank's decision.
there was the first post where he stated all the funding would go to the one coin
then there was the post you quoted - where he said something about 50% loss and the rest to "winner" but he also in that same post stated he like the "Rekt" (which I take as referring to the original - all funding to the one coin)
either way It should be up to Frank not us.
So I dont think that was "left open"
hence why I said there should be no voting. this is Frank's decision.
there was the first post where he stated all the funding would go to the one coin
then there was the post you quoted - where he said something about 50% loss and the rest to "winner" but he also in that same post stated he like the "Rekt" (which I take as referring to the original - all funding to the one coin)
either way It should be up to Frank not us.
And hence where the open comes from in the 1st post from Frank:
"Of course there is still a lot of question: material of the coin, design, price,... this is an open thread"
Agree, it's ultimately up to Frank but the spirit of his words seem to lean toward community involvement, which is why said it appears a vote will be needed. Also, appears doesn't mandate anything but merely hints.
Also, generally speaking, I belive the value of coins with crypto (and may it only be a few bucks) is way higher than unloaded stuff. Just my view.
Yes, it's up to Frank, but it is also up to the community to speak their mind and give input/ideas on the subject. What Frank does with this input is obviously up to him.
I'd like to hear what others think about the general coin funding topic.
Nice teaser pic @ Mopar.
heres the thing - dust is useless as you would possible spend more than its value to transfer it - add in the fact that you have to transfer it once you peel the coin to see you only have "dust" The coins will have no identifying mark nor will you know the address of the coin - the only way to see if you "won" or "lost" will be to peel it.
getting anything would then not be totally "rekt" would it?
my two sats at least.
And at one time 0.01 and 0.001 were considered dust but not really nowadays. I agree with KW's take on dust, scams, and loaded collectables. Also, you can still get rekt and not be totally or wholly wiped out- e.g., significant loss numerically or percentage wise, just look at ftx and luna.
perhaps if you let the coin sit - but with no identifying marks on the coin ie no firstbits - there will be no way to see if you won vs lost. so you peel and you lost and its 1000 sats, you will then spend 2000 to 4000 to transfer it - or would you simply leave it on the peeled and exposed private key?
either way I guess it is still up to Frank. but I will not be participating in buying any of the coins if all the coins are loaded.
