Are we in a middle of "Week of finding Satoshi" going on now or something? Since last week every bitcoin discussion is about Wright (personally I think that guy is not a real Satoshi)
And now I see another candidate for the title of bitcoin creator - Kleiman? Just ask Ira Kleiman about it aluminium case and it all will be clear...
Topic: Interesting Facts About David Kleiman's Life (Read 1683 times)
Doesn't really say much about his ability to create something like Bitcoin. You don't just decide that you're gonna become a computer programmer coming out the army and suddenly do something revolutionary.
That's like saying Einstein decided in his 30's to become a physicist.
That's like saying Einstein decided in his 30's to become a physicist.
You saying nothing good can come from the army then? I would differ from you on that, here is one example of someone coming from the army and making a huge success of his
life --> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Blunt
Your work does not define you as a person, it is only a way to make money to feed you, until you make it big. Let's not judge people, based on what work they did, before they
became famous.
Warren Buffett built his savings as a kid by delivering newspapers. And Donald Trump was made to collect empty soda bottles in exchange for money while Li Ka-Shing worked 16
hours a day making plastic flowers.
Who says Kleiman is Satoshi?
his father?
not sure but i found this his father?
And brother Ira Kleiman now holds the keys to the first million-plus bitcoins mined.
really any source of ira kleiman hold the keys ? http://gizmodo.com/this-australian-says-he-and-his-dead-friend-invented-bi-1746958692
Quote
While he was alive, Kleiman kept an aluminum-encased USB drive on his person at nearly all times. If there really is a cache of Kleiman’s bitcoins or anything else linking him to Satoshi, Paige said, “I guarantee that drive has some shit in it.” According to Paige, when Kleiman died, his brother, Ira Kleiman, took possession of it.
Who says Kleiman is Satoshi?
his father?
not sure but i found this his father?
And brother Ira Kleiman now holds the keys to the first million-plus bitcoins mined.
really any source of ira kleiman hold the keys ? Source: some extortionist; via Gizmodo.
Who says Kleiman is Satoshi?
his father?
not sure but i found this his father?
And brother Ira Kleiman now holds the keys to the first million-plus bitcoins mined.
really any source of ira kleiman hold the keys ? And brother Ira Kleiman now holds the keys to the first million-plus bitcoins mined.
Who says Kleiman is Satoshi?
his father?
his father?
He looks exactly like a police detective.
Who says Kleiman is Satoshi?
The guy seem to look older than 46. is that really him? And he doesn't look like the geek I imagined lol
From 2011, Dave Kleiman definitely not in a hospital room during this interview: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ForkipJu05c
The guy seem to look older than 46. is that really him? And he doesn't look like the geek I imagined lol
I dont think this guy is satoshi. As i say before there is evidence that the time this guy was in hospital Satoshi post comments here in this forum. Satoshi is very alive and still active in my opinion maybe is among us with other nickname.
And yet, in 2014, Kleiman's father makes this comment under a Techcrunch bitcoin article:
Quote
Please send information pertaining to David Kleiman's participation in the development of Bitcoin
http://techcrunch.com/2014/02/10/bitcoin-wins-best-technology-achievement-but-satoshi-doesnt-show/
Nothing interesting you say?
He's asking for information from the article's author. As a relative might do if they thought that evidence of their son having been involved in the development Bitcoin might give them access to large amounts of money.
You forgot the bit about how he clutched his silver metal encased USB the last few years of his life and now his brother has the key to 400M if he was one of the co-authors of the paper.
haha
It appears DK's talent in computers was mostly in the area of HDD fragmentation analysis and how hard it really is to 'erase' anything digitally.
What did Norton Erase used to do, like write 00000 over and over on a file thousands of times to make sure it couldn't be read again.
Nothing in DK's career or limited academic 'career' if his academics can even be called a 'career' show any connection to encryption and other ideas expressed in the original white paper.
DK didn't write it, the fake Satoshi aka Craig Wright didn't write it, neither had even one paper out on encryption and high level math theory.
DK analyzed HDD to try to put back together smashed drives and Wright was nothing but a guy installing canned network software that was good at updating patches.
There's nothing 'interesting' about either DK or CW as to their life.
Neither came up with anything original in their life.
Neither started a major company.
Neither authored a paper or a book worth reading.
The only interesting thing is how gullible the media is to believe Wright could have been Satoshi.
HAHA
haha
It appears DK's talent in computers was mostly in the area of HDD fragmentation analysis and how hard it really is to 'erase' anything digitally.
What did Norton Erase used to do, like write 00000 over and over on a file thousands of times to make sure it couldn't be read again.
Nothing in DK's career or limited academic 'career' if his academics can even be called a 'career' show any connection to encryption and other ideas expressed in the original white paper.
DK didn't write it, the fake Satoshi aka Craig Wright didn't write it, neither had even one paper out on encryption and high level math theory.
DK analyzed HDD to try to put back together smashed drives and Wright was nothing but a guy installing canned network software that was good at updating patches.
There's nothing 'interesting' about either DK or CW as to their life.
Neither came up with anything original in their life.
Neither started a major company.
Neither authored a paper or a book worth reading.
The only interesting thing is how gullible the media is to believe Wright could have been Satoshi.
HAHA
And yet, in 2014, Kleiman's father makes this comment under a Techcrunch bitcoin article:
Quote
Please send information pertaining to David Kleiman's participation in the development of Bitcoin
http://techcrunch.com/2014/02/10/bitcoin-wins-best-technology-achievement-but-satoshi-doesnt-show/
Nothing interesting you say?
From 2011, Dave Kleiman definitely not in a hospital room during this interview: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ForkipJu05c
Where did you get that "he must have entered the hospital for his final stay around April, 2010" ?
Isn't that private information?
Isn't that private information?
Circa 2012: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dn6q0dGrHRY
Was the above interview taken at Dave Kleiman's office or in his hospital room complete with secure wi-fi?
Doesn't really say much about his ability to create something like Bitcoin. You don't just decide that you're gonna become a computer programmer coming out the army and suddenly do something revolutionary.
That's like saying Einstein decided in his 30's to become a physicist.
That's like saying Einstein decided in his 30's to become a physicist.
Or Steven Hawking deciding today to take up bowling.
Fiat fun facts 
Can't really say that those facts are that interesting..
Most of it is indeed a bit too private and personal, but some of it must be known in order to try to trace a line with Satoshi, the fact that he entered the hospital around that time I think it's somewhat interesting because that's when Satoshi started to become less and less active. I think it's too farfetched to say this guy is Satoshi, let alone the other Craig guy.
Can't really say that those facts are that interesting..
Where did you get that "he must have entered the hospital for his final stay around April, 2010" ?
Isn't that private information?
Isn't that private information?
You forgot the bit about how he clutched his silver metal encased USB the last few years of his life and now his brother has the key to 400M if he was one of the co-authors of the paper.
haha
It appears DK's talent in computers was mostly in the area of HDD fragmentation analysis and how hard it really is to 'erase' anything digitally.
What did Norton Erase used to do, like write 00000 over and over on a file thousands of times to make sure it couldn't be read again.
Nothing in DK's career or limited academic 'career' if his academics can even be called a 'career' show any connection to encryption and other ideas expressed in the original white paper.
DK didn't write it, the fake Satoshi aka Craig Wright didn't write it, neither had even one paper out on encryption and high level math theory.
DK analyzed HDD to try to put back together smashed drives and Wright was nothing but a guy installing canned network software that was good at updating patches.
There's nothing 'interesting' about either DK or CW as to their life.
Neither came up with anything original in their life.
Neither started a major company.
Neither authored a paper or a book worth reading.
The only interesting thing is how gullible the media is to believe Wright could have been Satoshi.
HAHA
haha
It appears DK's talent in computers was mostly in the area of HDD fragmentation analysis and how hard it really is to 'erase' anything digitally.
What did Norton Erase used to do, like write 00000 over and over on a file thousands of times to make sure it couldn't be read again.
Nothing in DK's career or limited academic 'career' if his academics can even be called a 'career' show any connection to encryption and other ideas expressed in the original white paper.
DK didn't write it, the fake Satoshi aka Craig Wright didn't write it, neither had even one paper out on encryption and high level math theory.
DK analyzed HDD to try to put back together smashed drives and Wright was nothing but a guy installing canned network software that was good at updating patches.
There's nothing 'interesting' about either DK or CW as to their life.
Neither came up with anything original in their life.
Neither started a major company.
Neither authored a paper or a book worth reading.
The only interesting thing is how gullible the media is to believe Wright could have been Satoshi.
HAHA
Jump to: