Apparently nobody here likes films.
Still trying to confirm this, one way or another.
I like films as far as their ability to entertain me while I watch them. I don't stay for the credits and it's extremely rare I'm interested in cast interviews or "the making of" specials. I also have 0 interest in the actors/writers/producers etc in any context other than them putting on an enjoyable performance for me.
Similarly I don't care about bands either. I like some collections of sounds and not others and I judge them on a case by case basis regardless of the particulars involved in creating them.
There are some interesting people involved in making movies and music I'm sure, but they're strangers and if I'm going to spend time or energy on people, overall I'd rather it be people I have real relationships with.
The background to the making of a movie is about as intriguing to me as the history behind the company that produces the napkins I use to wipe bacon grease off my face (either might potentially make for a great story, which is something I do enjoy).
Not that I'm intending to put down movie buffs, I just don't "get it" I suppose.
Though I doubt this helps you much since historically I've noticed not many share my position on these types of things.
While we're on the topic I actually find credits at the beginning of a movie rather insulting. Each day I use my car to drive to work. My car does more for me than any individual movie has and exists due to the hard work and ingenuity of many people, and yet I don't have sit bored watching a list of names involved in the project before starting the ignition each time. It's only showbiz people with ego large enough to think that everyone should have to see their names scroll by before consuming their product.
I think you've misconstrued the concept of being a movie buff. It's not about following the actors, directors, etc. It's just so not that. Let me try and explain:
You said:
I like films as far as their ability to entertain me while I watch them.
That's all there is to it. As a movie buff, I provided several links to films, with little known facts that other people likely don't know, hence the opportunity to post in this thread - also simultaneously sharing films which are entertaining, enjoyable to watch, etc.
The little known facts are about enjoyable moments or enjoyable feelings or enjoyable synchronizations of music and visuals, etc. Everything about being a movie buff is about getting as much enjoyment out of the film as possible, or...
By knowing the director or actor, you then have a means of finding more films which will give you a similar quality or experience. If one film was great, then another by the same director might be great too, especially if he has a certain quality. As regards actors, you will typically find that enjoying a film actually has a lot to do with simply liking the actor or not. Finding other films with the same actors often yields good results.
As you have said, it makes no sense to care too much about the actor's real world personas or the director's real world persona, except in as much as how successful it is in helping you track down other movies.
Soundtracks and visuals merged together often yield an amazing experience. As an example, Wong Kar-Wai often creates a dreamy/swooney experience as he merges very beautiful cinematography with beautiful soundtracks, hence the reason for posting the following links earlier. Watch them, and you'll understand:
2046:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ePU0KP5vHfoIn the Mood for Love:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9kRQqksluZkFallen Angels:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KZda7nWftQIChungking Express:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K7yez4lXjBIDays of Being Wild:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6cExEkJjyD8In my post about the film
Let Me In, the appreciation is analogous to appreciating a literary form of storytelling in prose, and through repeated viewings (or readings), one can gain additional enjoyment. See this post:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.1189556And a clip from the film:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3jZ671P3u0oRegarding the last scene of Briggite Lin and the first scene of Faye Wong, the meta info adds a unique twist to the story by analogy. Knowledge of it is unnecessary, except perhaps for those who enjoyed the film and wish to use the actress's career trajectory to locate other films, which of course is beneficial to those who like films and seek films to watch.
As for Faye Wong's singing, it is so amazing, that one barely notices the the Cranberries cover is being sung in Cantonese! It's simply a beautiful thing to hear and worth pointing out. See this post:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.1189894Regarding Adagio, Syboney and
2046, it's simply a pointer to the pleasures of watching a pairing of beautiful music and a visually beautiful film. Surely you can appreciate such things, since you seek enjoyment when watching films:
Adagio in
2046:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I6ZKzBc6QTYSiboney, by Connie Francis in
2046:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rNl_8VSmYu8Regarding tributes to a film, within another film: They're typically made to pay homage to a great film, thus a clue that such film is a candidate to put on your list to watch, for purposes of pure enjoyment. Furthermore, it's pleasurable to notice them.
The tribute:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S9OUrAHWOMEThe film being paid homage to:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SpvOUnz4T7Q In closing, I can only say that by following these things, I have discovered new films to watch that have given me great pleasure and enriched my life.