Topic: International terrorism (Read 1065 times)
Ceйм Лaтвии пpизнaл Poccию «гocyдapcтвoм, пoддepживaющим тeppopизм».
terrorists are not of Islam, only those who hate Islam who pretend to be Islam and in the name of Islam in their deeds, Islam has never taught killing, Islam like peace..
The cause of terrorism is not in religion, but in interference in Islamic countries.
Terrorism is a real problem
I can't imagine how people kill each other in the name of God
I can't imagine how people kill each other in the name of God
This has been known since the time of the Crusades.
terrorists are not of Islam, only those who hate Islam who pretend to be Islam and in the name of Islam in their deeds, Islam has never taught killing, Islam like peace..
Terrorism is a real problem
I can't imagine how people kill each other in the name of God
I can't imagine how people kill each other in the name of God
I believe that after the terrorist attack with the use of prohibited poisonous substances related to weapons of mass destruction, the West will finally understand that Russia is a terrorist country, a country of universal Evil and Lies that must be isolated in order to save Mankind from the Catastrophe - World War III.
Also, is the Taliban also Arab?
no but arabs were sent to afghanistan with saudi/western money and weapons and the taliban sprung up out of that mess. western intervention is absolutely at the root of islamic terrorism but that in no way exonerates arabs for their own backward ways.This whole western intervention things is one of the tough ones to try to fight on, lets think about that for a second. The US went in to dismantle a regime that they tought had Weapons of Mass Destruction (Saddam Hussein) even if this is a bit flaky on the evidence part, some people swear to them fully thinking at the time that this was true. So even if the West didn't involve themselves, some other nation around them may have stepped in to stop this
Lets go further with this, lets say no other nation came in. I feel as if all of the harsh putting down of dissidence would lead to at some point there being a revolution in these countries that would cause the same sort of hate which is present today - may not against the western nations like it's concentrated right now but the hate would still be there and running.
International Terrorism is always going to be causing a problem, we just have to limit it.
This war began fool Bush, Jr., who instead of eliminating the real cause of the tragedy of September 11, attacked Iraq, which had nothing to do with the terrorist act.
I have ceased to understand something, and here is Trump on September 11? Maybe you tell me exactly what you mean? What is the connection between Trump and the terrorist attack of September 11?
What secrets can there be! It is known that on September 11 the work of the Arab organization Al-Qaeda, whose goal is to fight against Israel and the United States.
Also, is the Taliban also Arab?
no but arabs were sent to afghanistan with saudi/western money and weapons and the taliban sprung up out of that mess. western intervention is absolutely at the root of islamic terrorism but that in no way exonerates arabs for their own backward ways.This whole western intervention things is one of the tough ones to try to fight on, lets think about that for a second. The US went in to dismantle a regime that they tought had Weapons of Mass Destruction (Saddam Hussein) even if this is a bit flaky on the evidence part, some people swear to them fully thinking at the time that this was true. So even if the West didn't involve themselves, some other nation around them may have stepped in to stop this
Lets go further with this, lets say no other nation came in. I feel as if all of the harsh putting down of dissidence would lead to at some point there being a revolution in these countries that would cause the same sort of hate which is present today - may not against the western nations like it's concentrated right now but the hate would still be there and running.
International Terrorism is always going to be causing a problem, we just have to limit it.
This war began fool Bush, Jr., who instead of eliminating the real cause of the tragedy of September 11, attacked Iraq, which had nothing to do with the terrorist act.
I have ceased to understand something, and here is Trump on September 11? Maybe you tell me exactly what you mean? What is the connection between Trump and the terrorist attack of September 11?
Also, is the Taliban also Arab?
no but arabs were sent to afghanistan with saudi/western money and weapons and the taliban sprung up out of that mess. western intervention is absolutely at the root of islamic terrorism but that in no way exonerates arabs for their own backward ways.This whole western intervention things is one of the tough ones to try to fight on, lets think about that for a second. The US went in to dismantle a regime that they tought had Weapons of Mass Destruction (Saddam Hussein) even if this is a bit flaky on the evidence part, some people swear to them fully thinking at the time that this was true. So even if the West didn't involve themselves, some other nation around them may have stepped in to stop this
Lets go further with this, lets say no other nation came in. I feel as if all of the harsh putting down of dissidence would lead to at some point there being a revolution in these countries that would cause the same sort of hate which is present today - may not against the western nations like it's concentrated right now but the hate would still be there and running.
International Terrorism is always going to be causing a problem, we just have to limit it.
This war began fool Bush, Jr., who instead of eliminating the real cause of the tragedy of September 11, attacked Iraq, which had nothing to do with the terrorist act.
I have ceased to understand something, and here is Trump on September 11? Maybe you tell me exactly what you mean? What is the connection between Trump and the terrorist attack of September 11?
I believe there was no Islamic terrorism in the 1960s at all and I wonder where was Islam back then, In a twisted way, the USA and it's fight against communism brought about the emergence of the Taliban who are pioneers in the world of terrorism and they are still using this method in Syria as well.
They never forgot how the West they used to despise and ridicule rose up, surpassed them and then eventually invaded them, the same way they tried conquering Europe before. It was really only a matter of time. For example, they keep on remembering the humiliation after the collapse of the Ottomans but they look back to the Arab caliphate and Ottoman empire as a glorious past, forgetting that involves doing the same actions they blame the Europeans of doing.
The war with Russia simply enabled the fundamentalists to receive arms, they could have been supported by anyone. Remember, America armed them against the Russians, and then they turned and bit the Americans.
The world of terrorism is very difficult to guess, because when they get allies, provide facilities to allies,
They should also be prepared with what will happen next, whether they will turn against or they stay together.
All that is difficult, because war is very sensitive
Recently there was information that Donald Trump was going to voice or even give the public the whole truth about what happened on September 11. If this is really true, and in this case, the special services of the United States are involved, then this is a real bomb. It seems to me that Trump risks losing all And including life.
After becoming the President of the United States, Donald Trump realized the difficulties in staying on that post. He had to make a lot of compromises with all sorts of people. So don't expect him to spill any beans on the 9/11 attacks.
Recently there was information that Donald Trump was going to voice or even give the public the whole truth about what happened on September 11. If this is really true, and in this case, the special services of the United States are involved, then this is a real bomb. It seems to me that Trump risks losing all And including life.
After becoming the President of the United States, Donald Trump realized the difficulties in staying on that post. He had to make a lot of compromises with all sorts of people. So don't expect him to spill any beans on the 9/11 attacks.
Also, is the Taliban also Arab?
no but arabs were sent to afghanistan with saudi/western money and weapons and the taliban sprung up out of that mess. western intervention is absolutely at the root of islamic terrorism but that in no way exonerates arabs for their own backward ways.This whole western intervention things is one of the tough ones to try to fight on, lets think about that for a second. The US went in to dismantle a regime that they tought had Weapons of Mass Destruction (Saddam Hussein) even if this is a bit flaky on the evidence part, some people swear to them fully thinking at the time that this was true. So even if the West didn't involve themselves, some other nation around them may have stepped in to stop this
Lets go further with this, lets say no other nation came in. I feel as if all of the harsh putting down of dissidence would lead to at some point there being a revolution in these countries that would cause the same sort of hate which is present today - may not against the western nations like it's concentrated right now but the hate would still be there and running.
International Terrorism is always going to be causing a problem, we just have to limit it.
This war began fool Bush, Jr., who instead of eliminating the real cause of the tragedy of September 11, attacked Iraq, which had nothing to do with the terrorist act.
Like lock her up? Wait and never see...
Also, is the Taliban also Arab?
no but arabs were sent to afghanistan with saudi/western money and weapons and the taliban sprung up out of that mess. western intervention is absolutely at the root of islamic terrorism but that in no way exonerates arabs for their own backward ways.This whole western intervention things is one of the tough ones to try to fight on, lets think about that for a second. The US went in to dismantle a regime that they tought had Weapons of Mass Destruction (Saddam Hussein) even if this is a bit flaky on the evidence part, some people swear to them fully thinking at the time that this was true. So even if the West didn't involve themselves, some other nation around them may have stepped in to stop this
Lets go further with this, lets say no other nation came in. I feel as if all of the harsh putting down of dissidence would lead to at some point there being a revolution in these countries that would cause the same sort of hate which is present today - may not against the western nations like it's concentrated right now but the hate would still be there and running.
International Terrorism is always going to be causing a problem, we just have to limit it.
This war began fool Bush, Jr., who instead of eliminating the real cause of the tragedy of September 11, attacked Iraq, which had nothing to do with the terrorist act.
Fucking monkey that allow gmos while they have all the communications of all those implicated in the scam are worthless. Btw the clintons are at the center of the gmos scam and nuke cover up.
Then frankly sarah palin has a real military strategy...
Now frankly... now frankly... usa... civil war and reboot, no more potus but a group... this one man poney show isn't working... or put an ai.
Then frankly sarah palin has a real military strategy...
Now frankly... now frankly... usa... civil war and reboot, no more potus but a group... this one man poney show isn't working... or put an ai.
Also, is the Taliban also Arab?
no but arabs were sent to afghanistan with saudi/western money and weapons and the taliban sprung up out of that mess. western intervention is absolutely at the root of islamic terrorism but that in no way exonerates arabs for their own backward ways.This whole western intervention things is one of the tough ones to try to fight on, lets think about that for a second. The US went in to dismantle a regime that they tought had Weapons of Mass Destruction (Saddam Hussein) even if this is a bit flaky on the evidence part, some people swear to them fully thinking at the time that this was true. So even if the West didn't involve themselves, some other nation around them may have stepped in to stop this
Lets go further with this, lets say no other nation came in. I feel as if all of the harsh putting down of dissidence would lead to at some point there being a revolution in these countries that would cause the same sort of hate which is present today - may not against the western nations like it's concentrated right now but the hate would still be there and running.
International Terrorism is always going to be causing a problem, we just have to limit it.
This war began fool Bush, Jr., who instead of eliminating the real cause of the tragedy of September 11, attacked Iraq, which had nothing to do with the terrorist act.
Also, is the Taliban also Arab?
no but arabs were sent to afghanistan with saudi/western money and weapons and the taliban sprung up out of that mess. western intervention is absolutely at the root of islamic terrorism but that in no way exonerates arabs for their own backward ways.This whole western intervention things is one of the tough ones to try to fight on, lets think about that for a second. The US went in to dismantle a regime that they tought had Weapons of Mass Destruction (Saddam Hussein) even if this is a bit flaky on the evidence part, some people swear to them fully thinking at the time that this was true. So even if the West didn't involve themselves, some other nation around them may have stepped in to stop this
Lets go further with this, lets say no other nation came in. I feel as if all of the harsh putting down of dissidence would lead to at some point there being a revolution in these countries that would cause the same sort of hate which is present today - may not against the western nations like it's concentrated right now but the hate would still be there and running.
International Terrorism is always going to be causing a problem, we just have to limit it.
http://www.dailystar.co.uk/news/latest-news/618166/Manchester-Arena-bombing-Salman-Abedi-terror-group-backed-Britain ijs 
Mi6/cia are professionnal of brainwashing, it's not even so hard to track down all this "turn your neightboor into a vegetable suicide bomber in 3 lessons" to nazi experiment with radical brainwashed commandos, and how both cia & kgb got their share of these techniques.
See baku conference 1920, and connection with some turquish nationalist nut, how modern jihadism was created along side with radical communism to destabilize un friendly regims.
To me 95% of guerillas are not endogene but fabricated by a service or another. Until it turn full hellsing .
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_and_state-sponsored_terrorism
The United States has at various times in recent history provided support to terrorist and paramilitary organizations around the world. It has also provided assistance to numerous authoritarian regimes that have used state terrorism as a tool of repression.[1][2]
The CIA wrote a manual for the Contras, entitled Psychological Operations in Guerrilla Warfare (Operaciones sicológicas en guerra de guerrillas), which focused mainly on how "Armed Propaganda Teams" could build political support in Nicaragua for the Contra cause through deceit, intimidation, and violence.[76] The manual discussed assassinations.[77] The CIA claimed that the purpose of the manual was to "moderate" the extreme violence already being used by the Contras.[78]
The manual, Psychological Operations in Guerrilla Warfare, clearly advocated a strategy of terror as the means to victory over the hearts and minds of Nicaraguans. Chapter headings such as ‘Selective Use of Violence for propagandistic Effects' and ‘Implicit and Explicit Terror' made that fact clear enough. ... The little booklet thus violated President Reagan's own Presidential Directive 12333, signed in December 1981, which prohibited any U.S. government employee—including the CIA—from having anything to do with assassinations.[79]
Mi6/cia are professionnal of brainwashing, it's not even so hard to track down all this "turn your neightboor into a vegetable suicide bomber in 3 lessons" to nazi experiment with radical brainwashed commandos, and how both cia & kgb got their share of these techniques.
See baku conference 1920, and connection with some turquish nationalist nut, how modern jihadism was created along side with radical communism to destabilize un friendly regims.
To me 95% of guerillas are not endogene but fabricated by a service or another. Until it turn full hellsing .
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_and_state-sponsored_terrorism
The United States has at various times in recent history provided support to terrorist and paramilitary organizations around the world. It has also provided assistance to numerous authoritarian regimes that have used state terrorism as a tool of repression.[1][2]
The CIA wrote a manual for the Contras, entitled Psychological Operations in Guerrilla Warfare (Operaciones sicológicas en guerra de guerrillas), which focused mainly on how "Armed Propaganda Teams" could build political support in Nicaragua for the Contra cause through deceit, intimidation, and violence.[76] The manual discussed assassinations.[77] The CIA claimed that the purpose of the manual was to "moderate" the extreme violence already being used by the Contras.[78]
The manual, Psychological Operations in Guerrilla Warfare, clearly advocated a strategy of terror as the means to victory over the hearts and minds of Nicaraguans. Chapter headings such as ‘Selective Use of Violence for propagandistic Effects' and ‘Implicit and Explicit Terror' made that fact clear enough. ... The little booklet thus violated President Reagan's own Presidential Directive 12333, signed in December 1981, which prohibited any U.S. government employee—including the CIA—from having anything to do with assassinations.[79]
To limit or eradicate international terrorism, we need to get to the root cause. Why do people feel that this is the only way to solve their problems?
You know? Suggest another.
So, as I understand, you have nothing to offer.
Jump to: