Topic: Interstellar 10/10 (Read 4334 times)
Personally, I loved the film. One of the reasons the 5ths need Cooper is that they no longer are able to communicate, or maybe even think, in just the three dimensions we do now. It's possible they wouldn't think of Saturn as far from Earth at all.
Am I just being stupid or is that a paradox?
If he doesn't get the coordinates to NASA, he doesn't go to NASA. He doesn't go to NASA, he doesn't go to space. He doesn't go to space, he doesn't send NASA's coordinates to the past. He doesn't send NASA's coordinates to the past, he doesn't go to NASA.
If he doesn't get the coordinates to NASA, he doesn't go to NASA. He doesn't go to NASA, he doesn't go to space. He doesn't go to space, he doesn't send NASA's coordinates to the past. He doesn't send NASA's coordinates to the past, he doesn't go to NASA.
Yes that is the paradox, it arises from linear time, where one event must precede the other. In non linear time, events can exist at the same time.
An analogy is 2d and 3d. If you are an ant in a glass and are limited to the ground plane, you are trapped. If you are a smart ant, and are aware of a third orthogonal dimension, you can escape the spatial trap by taking advantage of it.
The idea is the the future humans, aliens, etc...have discovered this orthogonal time dimension, or multiple dimensions.
Am I just being stupid or is that a paradox?
If he doesn't get the coordinates to NASA, he doesn't go to NASA. He doesn't go to NASA, he doesn't go to space. He doesn't go to space, he doesn't send NASA's coordinates to the past. He doesn't send NASA's coordinates to the past, he doesn't go to NASA.
If he doesn't get the coordinates to NASA, he doesn't go to NASA. He doesn't go to NASA, he doesn't go to space. He doesn't go to space, he doesn't send NASA's coordinates to the past. He doesn't send NASA's coordinates to the past, he doesn't go to NASA.
I couldn't finish gravity.. there was no storyline or scifi that got me interested. I don't get it. Interstellar on the other hand.. probably the best space move I've seen. They actually apply quantum mechanics too.
I like Sandra so the plot was not important.
Really the best space movie? What about Space Odyssey, Star Trek, Contact... There's a lot of great space movies out there
The film was bearable inspite of the leads. Sandra was alright, nothing special, but Clooney was terrible.
Comparing Gravity and Interstellar does not make sense. Both very different types of films.
I prefer InterStellar rather than Gravity and Jupiter Ascending
Some body PLease give me the download link
http://torrentbutler.eu/157336-interstellar
Some body PLease give me the download link
very nice movie, I watched from the begining..,
best movies till now in my life..
9/10
best movies till now in my life..
9/10
I couldn't finish gravity.. there was no storyline or scifi that got me interested. I don't get it. Interstellar on the other hand.. probably the best space move I've seen. They actually apply quantum mechanics too.
I like Sandra so the plot was not important.
Really the best space movie? What about Space Odyssey, Star Trek, Contact... There's a lot of great space movies out there
The film was bearable inspite of the leads. Sandra was alright, nothing special, but Clooney was terrible.
Comparing Gravity and Interstellar does not make sense. Both very different types of films.
Any of you have link to mediafire off interstellar, 10/10 
?
?I thought I was in the altcoin section first and that you were talking about Stellar.
lol. That stellar is sort of dead right now. Hearing nothing from the developers
I thought I was in the altcoin section first and that you were talking about Stellar.
Interstellar 9/10
I loved the soundtrack, I loved the story line, I loved the special effects, and I don't understand why some people didn't like it.
I loved the soundtrack, I loved the story line, I loved the special effects, and I don't understand why some people didn't like it.
I think the soundtrack in the movie makes it 10 times better to watch.
CERN didn't make any black holes and we're all still alive, I can't believe people are still actually trying to believe in this bullshit peddled by a science professor from a high school and yes, that's where this 'theory' came from and at best, it's a stupid poorly thought out theory and at it's worse something that was concocted by a religious lunatic to try and shut down the project because it is one more nail in the coffin of creationism.
You're an idiot
Before I even read the rest of the crap you just pooped out here kindly tell me what gave you the right to make a personal remark here ?
Watched interstellar. it was pretty bad.
If some mysterious aliens could drop off a portal that went to a bunch of different habitable planets then you would think they could just save earths climate.
If some mysterious aliens could drop off a portal that went to a bunch of different habitable planets then you would think they could just save earths climate.
They were not mysterious aliens.. It was explained who those people were.
That "mysterious force" came from humans in the future who had access to 5th dimension, which transcended time.
Hahaha you didnt understand shit my friend
The movie said it COULD be humans but who it really was, was never shown.
This is a classical causality paradox that arises when time is considered as a linear entity. If time is considered not linear, where singular events are considered the super position of all events, everything can exist at once.
If your familiar with quantum mechanics this called a wave function collapse. The matter waves exist in all states, until they are observed then lock into a single form.
In the movie, all events exist at the same time, until an observer locks the event by observing it, principle of super position.
The future humans made the worm hole because it always existed, but it didn't exist until they made it. This is the paradox. From one point of view the worm hole never existed, from another it always existed. If these points are view are merged in a particular manner you get causality
Even A caused event B
Yes I know its very confusing and not satisfying..too bad
About worm holes, they are a consequence of particular solutions to Einstein's field equations, but they have never been observed and are only theoretical..The poster above who said nature makes them all the time is lying. Just because they are mathematically possible doesn't mean they are physically possible.
Magnetic mono-poles are mathematically possible in Maxwell's equations, but they have never been observed. A magnet with only a north or south.
Kip Thorne was the science adviser and apparently the modelling of the black hole gargantua was the most realistic simulation ever done and matched very well with the field equations.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kip_Thorne
http://news.discovery.com/space/interstellar-black-hole-is-best-black-hole-in-sci-fi-141029.htm
As someone who studied physics formally, the movie was pure science porn. A+. There was even a correctly placed '-g' for gravity in a particular field equation on a blackboard. Very well done.
I am not sure why you made this post, also, the fact that I know and understand superposition property principle doesnt mean everyone else will. What really confuses me about your post is the reason for it's existence.
Also, do you want me to take you for a trip to the LHC ? Where they were actively recreating mini wormholes and blackholes which are mathematically proved while evidential proof have recently been detected in the form of Higgs particles ?
The fact that we cant yet detect them with that big of an instrument is the sole reason why the LHC is undergoing an upgrade.
Lastly, if you dont want to believe in the existence of something that is mathematically proven but not yet physically observed then that is more of a philosophical standpoint. As human beings we are lucky enough to even comprehend the vastness of this universe, observing it while being Earth-locked is a long shot.
You're an idiot, First provide evidence of wormholes at CERN, please...I'm waiting. Also please provide evidence of mini black holes, which may be created at high enough eV levels, but have not been yet. Again send me the paper from CERN's website. Here I'll get you started. http://home.web.cern.ch/
I never said I believe mathematical constructs aren't possible, I said they may not be possible.
Quote
Just because they are mathematically possible doesn't mean they are physically possible.
Magnetic mono-poles are mathematically possible in Maxwell's equations, but they have never been observed. A magnet with only a north or south.
Magnetic mono-poles are mathematically possible in Maxwell's equations, but they have never been observed. A magnet with only a north or south.
Please show were I said they are not physically possible? Mathematical models don't work in all circumstances, the inverse square law uses mathematical points. A point electron doesn't exist, the model breaks down at 1/r^2 as r->0, additional models are required to resolve this inconsistency. Basic em theory says at r=0, an electron has infinite charge. Maybe a worm hole is analogous, the math shows a worm hole at r=0, but maybe the math is incomplete. Until they can be created at will and verified we won't know.
Here is a link you may find of interest.
http://www.englishforeveryone.org/Topics/Reading-Comprehension.htm
Watched interstellar. it was pretty bad.
If some mysterious aliens could drop off a portal that went to a bunch of different habitable planets then you would think they could just save earths climate.
If some mysterious aliens could drop off a portal that went to a bunch of different habitable planets then you would think they could just save earths climate.
They were people from the future, so they needed us (the people from the past) to figure it out. They gave them the fishing rod instead of the fish.
How could there be future humans if the past humans gone extinct?
They didn't because they figured out how to survive but had to pay a bigger price, so they went back and helped people from the past to save some more and make them understand the theoretical concepts they were working on. In other words they survived in both past and future, but those from the future lost much more and needed more time to get to where they were.
i didn't call it shoddy because i haven't seen it. but many critic reviews have called it poor writing near the end.
Yes because throughout the movie they presented somewhat scientifically accurate fiction, but in the end it just went hooga booga.
Dvd version is already available on torrents.
Interstellar 9/10
I loved the soundtrack, I loved the story line, I loved the special effects, and I don't understand why some people didn't like it.
I loved the soundtrack, I loved the story line, I loved the special effects, and I don't understand why some people didn't like it.
i didn't call it shoddy because i haven't seen it. but many critic reviews have called it poor writing near the end.
Jump to: