Topic: Intrinsic value of Bitcoin and Gold (Read 260 times)

 I am not even bothered if Bitcoin has no intrinsic value so far there is a rewarding value (extrinsic) I get my full satisfaction. If we demand an intrinsic value for Bitcoin then we are actually demanding a centralized involvement and a regulatory governing body forfeiting it's intended objective.

Come to think of it it's government agency that attributes value to commodities. If there is an intrinsic value then the peer-to-peer network would have to be forfieted.
Any one with a contrary opinion?

Yes, bitcoin is relatively fragile. Therefore not suitable holding really loooong time (centuries).

That should not matter at all, you just said that if gold collapses, so why does it make a difference if you have for instance 1 pound of gold that is worth nothing in comparison to a couple of bitcoins that have no value?

If you could imagine a future that world crisis reached to a point that there is zero internet connection to work with which is extremely unlikely, I could agree with the statement that gold could be worth more than Bitcoin, but in any other cases I don't see how Gold could have any advantage over Bitcoin in terms of use case or its value for the person, specially when you consider the fact how it is easier to exchange Bitcoin comparing to exchanging your Gold, the only thing you need to make a transaction with bitcoin is just internet and that's it, and this pandemic sort of reminded everyone what is the benefit in using crypto instead of using traditional banking system.

Everything that can be bought / sold, supply / demand has intrinsic value, whether it is a symbolic form, physical or emotional, or spiritual( bitcoin, gold).  Intrinsic of bitcoin in terms of academics:
1. Pulling friction (the driving force due to the needs of each person)
2. Historical origin.

The value of things is subjective. If its useful (or cute/cool) to you at that particular moment, you value it, if not, you don't.

Very simple: diamond in your pocket vs water in the Sahara desert. What good is a diamond when you are about to get dehydrated?

Reason people buy something its because they find it useful for their needs (or taste) at that given moment. The balance of those who think so and those who don't, is reflected in the market.

And yes this is more or less what the austrian school of economy teaches, the rest is nonsense. Time will set things straight.

The features of Bitcoin makes it valuable to a group of people, everyday growing more. They buy it and keep it. There is another group who thinks it doesn't have a future, they sell. The correlation of both is reflected in the market. Care to guess which side is winning? And why is that? The features of Bitcoin cannot change overnight by executive decree, this is one reason, but there are many more. Some people understand it, some don't, again, this gets reflected in the market.

So, stop wasting your time looking at the other schools of economy, they got it wrong, they don't look at history seriously like the austrians did. Time will set things straight sooner or later. Yeah, "intrinsic/extrinsic" is garbage, throw those concepts out.

Do we need everything to be of intrinsic value? While we really like bitcoin, before you know it, I don't think we care either intrinsic or extrinsic. because in the beginning we did something based on our love for bitcoin. so we didn't pay attention to quantitative judgments in the green eyes. we will continue to work on it. That was before the drivers shifted the position and advantage of bitcoin.

Only way that gold will collapse is if the people behind the scenes would let it go down, they know that when that happens, the economy will be on the verge of collapse and it will take more than a Great Depression before gold could ever be useless back then it was the most valuable item and if that ever happens again and the collapse destroys the Gold Wall that protects the economies in the brink of collapse then a real chaos will happen. I do agree, bitcoin is better than gold but we can't underestimate the power of those shiny bars, they can destroy nations.

Are you saying there's no intrinsic value in mental gymnastics?

I disagree.

And you still didn't debunk it. You just pointed out that a large part of gold's value comes from the "store of value" use case rather than its use as a material. And with Bitcoin it's 100% the value coming from the "money" use case, there's literally nothing else you can do it.

Having no intrinsic value is not the same as having no value at all, so there's no reason to make some mental gymnastics to prove that Bitcoin has intrinsic value.

I understand that there will always be a debate whether Bitcoin has an intrinsic value inherent in itself especially in comparison with the real physical gold. Actually, I don't approve that gold and Bitcoin has to be compared side by side. They have different uses and both have different advantages and disadvantages as well. On the other hand, there is also no need to belittle gold as it is one of the most known precious metals and no matter what I think it will never cease to exist in the market unless of course the end of humanity is soon to come and in which case Bitcoin can also be gone.

I did add the caveat "if nothing else".

This was meant to be more of a philosophical discussion about the nature of intrinsic value rather than a direct comparison of Bitcoin and gold.

Agreed. I see the main intrinsic value of Bitcoin as an insurance policy against these sort of threats.

The insurance policy concept it a good one to throw back at the skeptics who equate intrinsic value with physical presence.

The intrinsic value of gold is the mining costs.The intrinsic value of Bitcoin is the same-mining costs.
Gold is being mined in actual mines under the mountains.Bitcoin is being virtually mined by solving complex mathematical tasks.The process is called mining,but in the first case it's real mining,and in the other case is digital "mining".


This sounds like nonsense to me.Let's just not compare the value of Bitcoin and gold.
Let's compare Bitcoin only to all the other crypto coins and let's compare gold only to the precious metals.
Just like I've said it before.Comparing Bitcoin and gold is like comparing apples and bananas.

Although Bitcoin might achieve more value in the short run, it is guaranteed to be worthless someday. Maybe not today, maybe not tomorrow, and may not for centuries, but eventually, it will be worthless, and we can’t predict when that will be. Gold will continue to have value unless something very unexpected happens.

And that is indeed the reason why gold became something in the eyes of humanity. Its being shiny remains forever. It does not corrode. It is beautiful, although I think its beauty is partially due to the fact that it is somewhat scarce. Not to mention its malleability and ductility which makes it precious even in technologies. But if it collapses then everything will be gone as well. No better than a 24-word seed and a Ledger Nano S.

Intrinsic value is made up of production cost (mining gold or bitcoin), maintenance cost (rigs, equipments, infrastructures) and belief of the people. One bitcoin is one bitcoin and one gold bar is one gold bar but price changes from investor belief, from fiat inflation or hyper inflation, from social economic status.

The intrinsic value changes with weather condition, seasons. In the time with available cheap renewable power resources, production cost of bitcoin can be cheaper with same difficulty on the network. Oppositely, you will need higher production cost but do you see the BTC price has a one way positive relation with power costs. I don't see it.

Bitcoin is a mean of storage and a speculating asset.

Newbies need to understand that Bitcoin’s main value-proposition is censorship-resistance, which is only achievable through decentralization. I also believe only a few old Bitcoiners understand this, or tried to care to understand. Reading many of the posts, I know that many of us plebs should give some effort to educate themselves.

Are we back to the whole "Intrinsic value" value thing again. Every time the Bitcoin price goes through the roof.... the fiat slaves wants to debunk Bitcoin, based on it's intrinsic value. I think those people are just butthurt that they did not invest money into it and now wants to air their jealousy by talking shit about Bitcoin.

Yes, you cannot touch it.... and you cannot use it in motherboard circuits... but do we care about that when we can send "value" all over the world in a matter of minutes? (at a fraction of the fees, charged by other payment networks)

We can also bypass the middleman and pay for goods and services ...pseudo anonymously, if you really wanted to. (No government oversight and tracking) Why should every f#$% transaction be transparent to every Tom Dick 'n Harry.... (Marketing firms / Government agencies / Financial institutions / Large global firms)  

That had always been the debate with me and my wife who really loves gold. 
When you are exposed to the internet it's easy to say everything should have value now even without a physical attribute.
"Internet" "data" you could not see it or touch it but now it's difficult to live without it.

Will the world still revolve without gold? Yeah.
The same goes with Bitcoin. The usage and demand are what will keep it going.
But we don't know what the future brings. Maybe someday it will just become history and a better one will float.

Why should everything have intrinsic value? Why does it have to be useful by itself? Bitcoin can't be useful by itself! It's the harmony of its users that makes it valuable. It's the privacy that provides, it's the freedom. It is useful for the people, not because it's a ledger with transactions. The fact that it's censorship resistant, that no one can re-write the transactions, that everyone agrees upon it. This is value.

Gold has an intrinsic value and I agree that bitcoin doesn't. Bitcoin is valuable, because of the agreement of its users.

If all bitcoins of the world, suddenly disappeared, would anyone noticed it except from those that use it?