Author

Topic: IOTA - page 737. (Read 1473405 times)

hero member
Activity: 714
Merit: 500
November 08, 2015, 02:59:48 AM
Hi iotatoken,

in which curreny will the ICO take place?
Bitcoin, Nxt oder even US Dollar?

Many thanks in advance!


Bitcoin
hero member
Activity: 1069
Merit: 682
November 08, 2015, 02:47:52 AM
Hi iotatoken,

in which curreny will the ICO take place?
Bitcoin, Nxt oder even US Dollar?

Many thanks in advance!
hero member
Activity: 714
Merit: 500
November 07, 2015, 08:21:06 AM
Scale quantum computers do not exist yet maybe until 3000 year and who knows, While we need things to current devices to be used 2016-2999, So why hurry? What's the rush to “Obsolete” all convert?

https://www.nsa.gov/ia/programs/suiteb_cryptography/

Two security researchers have published a paper compiling the theories about the post-quantum cryptography advisory.

A Riddle Wrapped in an Enigma
Neal Koblitz and Alfred J. Menezes

http://eprint.iacr.org/2015/1018.pdf
http://cacr.uwaterloo.ca/techreports/2015/cacr2015-14.pdf

http://blog.cryptographyengineering.com/2015/10/a-riddle-wrapped-in-curve.html

Very interesting reading. There are indeed breakthroughs in quantum computation almost weekly. Now of course 'breakthrough' is a laden word, but it's not really a controversial thing in academia. Big steps towards practical quantum computers are published wekly. Not too long ago there was still die-hard skeptics that claimed that decoherence made quantum computers IMPOSSIBLE, now of course we know that is bogus. Given that accelerating technology and research it should really be a no-brainer for anyone inventing the future to include protection against this.
legendary
Activity: 2142
Merit: 1010
Newbie
November 07, 2015, 07:37:03 AM
Two security researchers have published a paper compiling the theories about the post-quantum cryptography advisory.

A Riddle Wrapped in an Enigma
Neal Koblitz and Alfred J. Menezes

http://eprint.iacr.org/2015/1018.pdf
http://cacr.uwaterloo.ca/techreports/2015/cacr2015-14.pdf

http://blog.cryptographyengineering.com/2015/10/a-riddle-wrapped-in-curve.html

Could you post here objective part, i.e. not based on politics nor hypotheses?
member
Activity: 89
Merit: 10
November 07, 2015, 07:05:19 AM
Scale quantum computers do not exist yet maybe until 3000 year and who knows, While we need things to current devices to be used 2016-2999, So why hurry? What's the rush to “Obsolete” all convert?

https://www.nsa.gov/ia/programs/suiteb_cryptography/

Two security researchers have published a paper compiling the theories about the post-quantum cryptography advisory.

A Riddle Wrapped in an Enigma
Neal Koblitz and Alfred J. Menezes

http://eprint.iacr.org/2015/1018.pdf
http://cacr.uwaterloo.ca/techreports/2015/cacr2015-14.pdf

http://blog.cryptographyengineering.com/2015/10/a-riddle-wrapped-in-curve.html
legendary
Activity: 2142
Merit: 1010
Newbie
November 07, 2015, 05:00:35 AM
What these figures will make the developers?                                                               .

They show that the client can be written in pure JavaScript, transactions can be generated pretty fast even in a browser.
legendary
Activity: 1344
Merit: 1000
November 07, 2015, 04:20:02 AM
16.5 kH/s chrome
23.4 kH/s firefox

linux
sr. member
Activity: 476
Merit: 250
November 07, 2015, 03:34:48 AM
What these figures will make the developers?                                                               .
hero member
Activity: 596
Merit: 500
November 07, 2015, 02:30:17 AM
19.1 on latest Firefox, Linux Mint, Intel i7

13.3 with Chromium on the same machine.
sr. member
Activity: 378
Merit: 250
November 06, 2015, 11:49:09 PM
Well, guys, Iota needs your help. Run http://188.138.57.93/sam.html and post how many kH/s you've got, please. Mine is 12.1.

23.1 kH/s on Firefox
13 kH/s on Chromium
hero member
Activity: 589
Merit: 500
November 06, 2015, 08:29:28 PM
MacBook Air 2013

sam.js
9.5~10.5Kh/s  @Chrome 46.0.2490.80 m
14.0~15.1Kh/s @firefox 41.0.2

sam.exe  40Kh/s

I will boot on my Raspberry and CubieTruck again and test SaM if I have time.
legendary
Activity: 2142
Merit: 1010
Newbie
November 06, 2015, 05:17:45 PM
Do you have any linux file for checking, try to check my satellite receiver   Grin

Unfortunatelly, no.
legendary
Activity: 1162
Merit: 1005
November 06, 2015, 05:15:58 PM
This may seem silly, but I imagine that an old Blackberry phone from 2000 could be on-par with a very-basic IoT device of 2016/17.

There is a difference in performance of JS and native versions on the same device. Try http://188.138.57.93/sam.exe to see that difference.

PS: https://www.virustotal.com/en/file/0190c0d55fa76ccf6f414a9cc98f7196f978cfc7a89142284acaf58b7d34f88a/analysis/1446842680/

Do you have any linux file for checking, try to check my satellite receiver   Grin
legendary
Activity: 2142
Merit: 1010
Newbie
November 06, 2015, 03:45:54 PM
This may seem silly, but I imagine that an old Blackberry phone from 2000 could be on-par with a very-basic IoT device of 2016/17.

There is a difference in performance of JS and native versions on the same device. Try http://188.138.57.93/sam.exe to see that difference.

PS: https://www.virustotal.com/en/file/0190c0d55fa76ccf6f414a9cc98f7196f978cfc7a89142284acaf58b7d34f88a/analysis/1446842680/
hero member
Activity: 714
Merit: 500
November 06, 2015, 03:43:42 PM
0.7kH/s on Android TV stick  Grin

Hm, it's a good idea, I'll hand over it to our marketing dept.

Lol, if I can find it and a power supply, I'll try to boot up my old Blackberry (from about 5 years ago) and see what it reports. Tongue  This may seem silly, but I imagine that an old Blackberry phone from 2000 could be on-par with a very-basic IoT device of 2016/17.

Also, if anyone else has old WiFi enabled hardware lying around, this could be a fun benchmark to play with.  Everyone wants to be fast, but I think it'd be kind of fun to find the smallest number using standard browser settings on old hardware. Tongue

Great idea!
rlh
hero member
Activity: 804
Merit: 1004
November 06, 2015, 03:39:34 PM
0.7kH/s on Android TV stick  Grin

Hm, it's a good idea, I'll hand over it to our marketing dept.

Lol, if I can find it and a power supply, I'll try to boot up my old Blackberry (from about 5 years ago) and see what it reports. Tongue  This may seem silly, but I imagine that an old Blackberry phone from 2000 could be on-par with a very-basic IoT device of 2016/17.

Also, if anyone else has old WiFi enabled hardware lying around, this could be a fun benchmark to play with.  Everyone wants to be fast, but I think it'd be kind of fun to find the smallest number using standard browser settings on old hardware. Tongue
sr. member
Activity: 466
Merit: 250
November 06, 2015, 03:33:35 PM
Well, guys, Iota needs your help. Run http://188.138.57.93/sam.html and post how many kH/s you've got, please. Mine is 12.1.
14.6 kh/s
Macbook Pro 2012, Nvida GeForce GT 650M
legendary
Activity: 1162
Merit: 1005
November 06, 2015, 03:18:30 PM
OK, fine. Why it is good and how it is good for IOATA? Smiley

For Iota this result doesn't matter, it's just tokens, they don't care. For you it's good because you can use Iota on your TV stick.

Hope my stick will not explode using IOTA and NXT in it same time Smiley
legendary
Activity: 2142
Merit: 1010
Newbie
November 06, 2015, 03:05:36 PM
OK, fine. Why it is good and how it is good for IOATA? Smiley

For Iota this result doesn't matter, it's just tokens, they don't care. For you it's good because you can use Iota on your TV stick.
hero member
Activity: 1069
Merit: 682
November 06, 2015, 02:51:11 PM
0.9 kH/s with Chrome at a Wiko Rainbow 4G LTE Smartphone.
Jump to: