Pages:
Author

Topic: IOTA ICO Price? (Read 17955 times)

sr. member
Activity: 630
Merit: 250
January 11, 2018, 06:57:57 AM
#75
The price of IoTa on ICO 2 years ago was 0.00004 BTC

Now it is 0.000065 BTC


Wow I think I should by now?

Any thought about my decision?

I think it will be good investment.
sr. member
Activity: 630
Merit: 250
January 10, 2018, 04:12:13 AM
#74
IOTA is one more example which had shown that some ICOs turn into really good coins.
newbie
Activity: 7
Merit: 0
January 10, 2018, 04:08:44 AM
#73

iota is a good project. Grin Grin Grin Grin
full member
Activity: 602
Merit: 107
November 19, 2017, 11:36:41 AM
#72
IOTA ICO price was $0.000435 (source: https://coincodex.com/crypto/iota/) and it went up 1964x since 25th Nov 2015.

legendary
Activity: 1386
Merit: 1016
November 19, 2017, 11:16:27 AM
#71
Probably a good idea too get some sooner than later. I believe it's going to hit the Chinese exchange tomorrow which usually means a huge bull run.

Even now it's ramping up....1 week ago it was sitting at .35 as of now .87

Iota has been out of the radar for quite some time after the china fud and the discover of flawed coding in the system. Since then, it has been dropped from ATH of $1 to 30cents. The technology is good so it definitely will regain its strength.
newbie
Activity: 39
Merit: 0
November 19, 2017, 10:44:50 AM
#70
Probably a good idea too get some sooner than later. I believe it's going to hit the Chinese exchange tomorrow which usually means a huge bull run.

Even now it's ramping up....1 week ago it was sitting at .35 as of now .87
member
Activity: 73
Merit: 10
October 30, 2017, 02:20:55 PM
#69
The price of IoTa on ICO 2 years ago was 0.00004 BTC

Now it is 0.000065 BTC


Wow I think I should by now?

Any thought about my decision?
legendary
Activity: 2730
Merit: 1288
October 03, 2017, 10:54:48 AM
#68
So IOTA blew up...  Grin Grin

I dont know what you mean by that but price in BTC 300 times increase from ICO. In $ way more. Since ICO happened years ago and BTC was back then way under $1000 probably even under $500.

Community gatherd 1337 BTC (including JINN assets) for 999 999 999 so called "old iotas".
We send BTC without escrow to BTC address, there were no beta at this time, only whitepapper and hope that cfb will write code.

Full crowdsale info and distribution from that time https://tangle.ninja/iota/crowdsale
But it was long long ago.

So one old Iota in ICO was 0.00000133

1 000 000  OLD IOTA != 2 779 531 000 000 IOTA. That number was rounded. Just FYI.


so 1 old IOTA is 2 779 531 new IOTA or 2.78 mIOTA

mIOTA was in ICO 40.65 satoshi.
gIOTA was in ICO 40647 satoshi or 0.00040647 BTC

so price rose 33 times so far.
newbie
Activity: 38
Merit: 0
October 03, 2017, 07:32:39 AM
#67
So IOTA blew up...  Grin Grin
legendary
Activity: 2142
Merit: 1009
Newbie
September 03, 2016, 07:04:36 AM
#66
They will look at the observable events/evidence before them in the real world and make up their own minds.

This is not how human brain works. Think again.
legendary
Activity: 2100
Merit: 1167
MY RED TRUST LEFT BY SCUMBAGS - READ MY SIG
September 03, 2016, 06:53:15 AM
#65
No, it hints to others you are afraid to discuss the real issues here regarding iota being a rigged and manipulated self enrichment scam.

You say "A", I say "not A", whom will the others believe to if you are a confirmed liar? Do you know how it works in the real world? In the REAL, not illusory one.

They will look at the observable events/evidence before them in the real world and make up their own minds. Whatever you or I say we can not alter the observable events that have taken place in the real world.

But I'm not a confirmed liar as I have already pointed out but you are failing to recognise. You on the other hand ran the self enrichment scheme next ...so....not exactly difficult to believe you would attempt the same again.

You are also continually dodging all other more pertinent and important questions posed on this thread.

Have another read through and see if you can improve upon your English language comprehension. That's not meant as any kind of slight against you. You have done very well in that respect considering it's not your 1st language.

Even so it would be nice to converse with someone that can read and reply to questions i pose rather than me  answering all of your accusations and childish personal remarks, whilst you selectively ignore or avoid the real issues concerning iota.

I do appreciate your concerns regarding my retardation and mental illness. However, it is time now to move away from your fixation/fantasising on those matters and answer questions on iota and it's extremely narrow and easy to manipulate initial distribution in comparison to all other large icos ran on this board. Come on cfb even you can see this dodging and diversionary tactics have become all to obvious now. Enough about me or rather your false assumptions regarding me ...let's talk only about iota and the observable super narrow initial distribution and 33x price hike.



legendary
Activity: 2142
Merit: 1009
Newbie
September 03, 2016, 03:30:33 AM
#64
No, it hints to others you are afraid to discuss the real issues here regarding iota being a rigged and manipulated self enrichment scam.

You say "A", I say "not A", whom will the others believe to if you are a confirmed liar? Do you know how it works in the real world? In the REAL, not illusory one.
legendary
Activity: 2100
Merit: 1167
MY RED TRUST LEFT BY SCUMBAGS - READ MY SIG
September 02, 2016, 07:15:21 PM
#63
huh? still you try to divert with this item of personal interest rather than focus on the far larger picture??

I don't divert, I'm just hinting to the others that you are a confirmed liar. This makes most of your words worthless, doesn't it?

No, it hints to others you are afraid to discuss the real issues here regarding iota being a rigged and manipulated self enrichment scam. You see its very simple. I am asking you to comment on real observable events that anyone can see. So regardless of if im actually the devil or not it makes no difference. I am simply asking you to explain real observable events?

You logic is flawed here. A liars words are not worthless at all in certain cases even if he is a liar (which i am not). When you are being directed to examine observable events and make valid comparisons to other observable events then it matters not who directs you to examine them and for what reason. The observer himself must draw his own conclusions. 

Again you are trying to make it personal. But this will not help you because the more you try the more it become obvious you are scared to discuss the questions I have asked you to answer over and over about the ico of iota.

Now once again I await your answers to the important questions posed in this thread regarding the iota ICO not raising anything like the other well advertised ICO's and having such a tiny and narrow initial distribution that is open to manipulation and price hikes of 33x ico before release to the free market.

legendary
Activity: 2142
Merit: 1009
Newbie
September 02, 2016, 07:00:32 PM
#62
huh? still you try to divert with this item of personal interest rather than focus on the far larger picture??

I don't divert, I'm just hinting to the others that you are a confirmed liar. This makes most of your words worthless, doesn't it?
legendary
Activity: 2100
Merit: 1167
MY RED TRUST LEFT BY SCUMBAGS - READ MY SIG
September 02, 2016, 06:41:19 PM
#61
Wow that (lie) fully explains why eth, maid, lisk, waves, etc all had magnitudes greater initial distribution.

Let's first discuss why you lied that you hadn't known about Iota sale so you had been unable to take part in it. After that we'll move ahead, I already have an answer ready for you.

huh? still you try to divert with this item of personal interest rather than focus on the far larger picture??

I never said I had not heard of iota, only that I had not heard the crowd sale had started and finished. If you recall I had great issues like my account being hacked at the time and since I'd only recently been told not to even ask when the ico would start it seemed to suggest it would be way way in the future. Anyway I await your answer on both questions posed.

compare to all large ICO's and we'll hear you answer

I am specifically interested in why you did not employ a signature campaign since this is by far the most effective manner of advertising on this board. Rather you told me you did not want to raise more funds than you had?

Another point of interest is why this is not on exchanges yet? what's stopping it being sold on the free market right now?

I simply do not want to hear it was because of the ethereum hysteria other ico's did way better than iota and distributed better than iota. what about nem and maid, even ethereum itself?

You of all persons after being with the nxt team so tight should have known to make sure the initial distribution was a great as possible. You did not make sure of that at all.

The thing about this is you could have just kept a ton like ethereum devs but been straight about it and gave everyone else on the board a chance to be involved at a level playing field. Doing it this way you give a tiny minority and yourselves opportunity to manipulate the entire market and force the majority to buy in at 33x the ico price. This is not fair and iota should be made a pariah coin as example to others trying the same thing.

When you start your next project just keep a ton of coins for development and reasonable self enrichment but give a fair opportunity to the entire board to buy in at the ico price if they choose to do so.

I am not interested in making it a personal issue with me and neither should you be except if you want to divert from the bigger and more important picture. You are meant to be explaining to the entire board why they did not hear about your ico but heard about every other single big ico since then and are now forced to buy your tokens at 33x ico price.





legendary
Activity: 2142
Merit: 1009
Newbie
September 02, 2016, 04:09:12 PM
#60
Wow that (lie) fully explains why eth, maid, lisk, waves, etc all had magnitudes greater initial distribution.

Let's first discuss why you lied that you hadn't known about Iota sale so you had been unable to take part in it. After that we'll move ahead, I already have an answer ready for you.
legendary
Activity: 2100
Merit: 1167
MY RED TRUST LEFT BY SCUMBAGS - READ MY SIG
September 02, 2016, 04:06:04 PM
#59
blah blah blah - no substance or attempt to discuss the deliberately super narrow initial distribution.

It was already discussed long time ago, this is why you made into that video (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KM36ED544iE), because you knew about Iota sale but because of the retardation you missed the timeframe and then lied that you hadn't known about the sale. And was caught on the lie.

Wow that (lie) fully explains why eth, maid, lisk, waves, etc all had magnitudes greater initial distribution. One person (me) didn't invest another 15500 bitcoins and give it out to everyone else on the board for free. I see, that makes sense now. I commented on the thread and at that time we were told not to even ask when there would be a crowdsale. By the time I checked back in to this board it was over.

Stop trying to make it personal over and over. I am but one person however important you consider me to be. One person only did not miss the iota crowd sale 1000's of others did. Why even mention me? simple you want to divert from the real question of why the vast majority of ico investors in all these other icos missed your ico. (not just me) .

WHY?? because you did not advertise by the same means all the other ICO's did. Minimal advertising on this board - way less than all the other icos.

How do you explain that? why have they all raised 10x + or greater than iota?

Why would i buy iota tokens at a far great assumed market cap than these projects that have 10x more development funds??

How many have you sold under your sock puppet accounts for 33x ico price?





legendary
Activity: 2142
Merit: 1009
Newbie
September 02, 2016, 03:53:46 PM
#58
blah blah blah - no substance or attempt to discuss the deliberately super narrow initial distribution.

It was already discussed long time ago, this is why you made into that video (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KM36ED544iE), because you knew about Iota sale but because of the retardation you missed the timeframe and then lied that you hadn't known about the sale. And was caught on the lie.
legendary
Activity: 2100
Merit: 1167
MY RED TRUST LEFT BY SCUMBAGS - READ MY SIG
September 02, 2016, 03:44:56 PM
#57
I never said that by creating vast numbers of iota had you raised the MC. I said it is best now there are such vast amount of tokens it best be listed on the doge market not the btc market. What was the idea behind this change anyway?

Didn't I show you that Iota tokens supply is of the same level of magnitude as Bitcoin's? I could also show you that we reduced the supply 360-fold but this would be too hard for your brain. Autumn is the time when all mental diseases hit harder, I'll wait for the winter so my replies won't harm you.

blah blah blah - no substance or attempt to discuss the deliberately super narrow initial distribution. More childish and unprofessional personal comments. Your replies only harm you.


Number of Iota tokens =     2'779'530'283'277'761
Number of Bitcoin tokens = 2'100'000'000'000'000


blah blah blah

it's way better suited to the doge market place.

So leaving the novel way of representing your tokens supply compared to every other coin released aside. It is of minor interest to me since the entire project is a scam and I have not taken one moment to even look at the reasons nor the method used to now represent your tokens full minting.

Let's get back on track to the main question since you will take any opportunity to avoid it:

Why was iotas initial distribution so very very narrow compared to other ICO's on this board. Think eth, maid, lisk, waves, nem ETC.

there let me help you find the part I would like you to answer .... see above ^^^^^

Now try hard not to fall back to your usual spouting of childish personal remarks to subvert from answering the important questions iota will face now or will face in the future. Come of cfb you can do it......really focus and apply yourself. Surely one so smart will easily be able to answer this question to the reasonable satisfaction of all on the board. I mean just tell the truth if it's not another nxt type self enrichment scam then surely it must be easy to explain .

Why was iotas initial distribution so very very narrow compared to other ICO's on this board. Think eth, maid, lisk, waves, nem ETC.

Here i post it for you again. I hope you don't have an issue answering with in a semi professional manner.

Also did you say words to the effect that it does not matter if and when it was discovered that many sock puppet accounts were use to purchase iota (making the intial distribution even more narrow and easy to manipulate) that it did not matter because bitcointalk does not matter and you would find many other investors outside of this forum that would be unaware of these events??

Think hard before answering since you never know what evidence one may archive for later use.





legendary
Activity: 2142
Merit: 1009
Newbie
September 02, 2016, 02:40:02 PM
#56
I never said that by creating vast numbers of iota had you raised the MC. I said it is best now there are such vast amount of tokens it best be listed on the doge market not the btc market. What was the idea behind this change anyway?

Didn't I show you that Iota tokens supply is of the same level of magnitude as Bitcoin's? I could also show you that we reduced the supply 360-fold but this would be too hard for your brain. Autumn is the time when all mental diseases hit harder, I'll wait for the winter so my replies won't harm you.
Pages:
Jump to: