there are plenty of space behind 0.9.9.XXX
it will be live when it is ready
Topic: [IOTA] IOTA Speculation - page 123. (Read 171575 times)
Testing 0.9.9 !! Here it comes. Last, Last Chance!!
Get in at the last minute from the Top Selling, Most Trusted Iota Seller!
8 batches added!! 125G iota per batch.
(125,000,000,000 iota) or 44,972 for those learning new notations
.85 BTC per Batch
Get in at the last minute from the Top Selling, Most Trusted Iota Seller!
8 batches added!! 125G iota per batch.
(125,000,000,000 iota) or 44,972 for those learning new notations
.85 BTC per Batch
===================================================
OLD LIST
OLD NEW PRICE
22,500 NOW 62,539,447,500 0.75 BTC Skormie straight-sale
22,500 NOW 62,539,447,500 0.75 BTC Wesgen straight-sale
46,000 NOW 127,858,426,000 1.50 BTC peer2peer360 Seccour
22,500 NOW 62,539,447,500 0.75 BTC peer2peer360 straight-sale
22,500 NOW 62,539,447,500 0.75 BTC csdndownload straight-sale
22,500 NOW 62,539,447,500 0.75 BTC nextblast straight-sale
22,500 NOW 62,539,447,500 0.75 BTC CryptoMrM straight-sale
22,500 NOW 62,539,447,500 0.75 BTC Nextblast straight-sale
120,000 NOW 333,543,720,000 2.80 BTC BlackFor3st straight-sale
90,000 NOW 250,157,790,000 2.10 BTC Nanuk straight-sale
218,602 NOW 607,611,035,662 5.10 BTC Nextblast straight-sale
180,000 NOW 500,315,580,000 4.20 BTC passtracker straight-sale
270,000 NOW 750,473,370,000 5.70 BTC Ruiz straight-sale
50,000 NOW 138,976,550,000 0.95 BTC AlphaDet straight-sale
100,000 NOW 277,953,100,000 1.90 BTC Emperor of Man straight-sale
150,000 NOW 416,929,650,000 2.85 BTC Aragoon straight-sale
50,000 NOW 138,976,550,000 0.95 BTC Termie straight-sale
45,000 NOW 125,078,895,000 0.95 BTC BlackFor3st straight-sale
500,000 NOW 1,389,765,500,000 BTC Bubbletea789 straight-sale
PRIVATE DEAL 28.5 BTC Bubbletea789 straight-sale
NEW 750G IOTA 5 BTC Ruiz straight-sale
NEW 375G IOTA 2.55 BTC arjen01 straight-sale
NEW 500G IOTA 3.4 BTC bitcoinuserz straight-sale
NEW 125G IOTA 0.85 BTC CryptKeeper straight-sale
NEW 125G IOTA 0.85 BTC koYnsta straight-sale
NEW 250G IOTA 1.7 BTC Niemand straight-sale
Congrats to Niemand on his 2 Batch purchase!!!
Thanks for the business!!
The 8 batches that are left are straight sales directly through me.
Get em while you can!
You too, can still squeak in at the last moment and join us as an early adopter!!! Be Smart and ......
....BUY NOW!!
*The the process is completed when I receive the BTC payment. At that time you will receive confirmation that you have been added to the list of buyers that will be sent Iotas as soon a CFB gives the green light to do so.
My up to date sale amounts:
111,181,240,000.00 @ 1 btc cc001
333,543,720,000.00 @ 3btc schnib
222,362,480,000.00 @ 2btc Metaphilibert
111,181,240,000.00 @ 1 btc Yeash20
333,543,720,000.00 @ 3 btc arjen01
166,771,860,000.00 @ 1.5btc MoneyTeam
11,118,124,000.00 @ 0.1btc tk88one
138,976,550,000.00 @ 1.25 btc proto
22,236,248,000.00 @ 0.2 btc adam9910
222,362,480,000.00 @ 2 btc Dexter12
8,894,499,200,000.00 @ 80 Btc bigiotabig
55,590,620,000.00 @ 0.5 Btc Torn
111,181,240,000.00 @ 1 btc zzzman20
111,181,240,000.00 @ 1 btc transpotime21bus
22,236,248,000 @ 0.2 btc adam9910
333,543,720,000.00 @ 3 btc ramsroyal
222,362,480,000.00 @ 2 btc mr001
113,960,771,000 @ 1.025 btc braelis
544,788,076,000 @ 4.9 btc [anon]
55,590,620,000 @ 0.5 btc SupZ
200G @ 2 btc hasseklas
Selling 4,000G IOTA for sale at a rate of 1 BTC == 120G IOTA. Please contact me if you are interested!
111,181,240,000.00 @ 1 btc cc001
333,543,720,000.00 @ 3btc schnib
222,362,480,000.00 @ 2btc Metaphilibert
111,181,240,000.00 @ 1 btc Yeash20
333,543,720,000.00 @ 3 btc arjen01
166,771,860,000.00 @ 1.5btc MoneyTeam
11,118,124,000.00 @ 0.1btc tk88one
138,976,550,000.00 @ 1.25 btc proto
22,236,248,000.00 @ 0.2 btc adam9910
222,362,480,000.00 @ 2 btc Dexter12
8,894,499,200,000.00 @ 80 Btc bigiotabig
55,590,620,000.00 @ 0.5 Btc Torn
111,181,240,000.00 @ 1 btc zzzman20
111,181,240,000.00 @ 1 btc transpotime21bus
22,236,248,000 @ 0.2 btc adam9910
333,543,720,000.00 @ 3 btc ramsroyal
222,362,480,000.00 @ 2 btc mr001
113,960,771,000 @ 1.025 btc braelis
544,788,076,000 @ 4.9 btc [anon]
55,590,620,000 @ 0.5 btc SupZ
200G @ 2 btc hasseklas
Selling 4,000G IOTA for sale at a rate of 1 BTC == 120G IOTA. Please contact me if you are interested!
IOTA testing of 0.9.9
http://forum.iotatoken.com/t/iota-testing-of-0-9-9-has-commenced/274/1
http://forum.iotatoken.com/t/iota-testing-of-0-9-9-has-commenced/274/1
That's what makes it so damn sexy. I have more hope for IOTA than Ethereum, value and usefulness wise.
me too. I find it extremely interesting what is happening with ETH right now.
This is a speculation hysteria JUGGERNAUT. Now what will happen when it does not scale? Ay Caramba, Once again, there won't be enough popcorn in the universe to go with the ensuing drama.
Opposed to that we have IOTA, which is somehow mostly overlooked by speculators, but which will scale.
Overlooked? It's not released yet and has many speculators. Much more than the over hyped lisk.
This doesn't affect it's potential, however.
That's what makes it so damn sexy. I have more hope for IOTA than Ethereum, value and usefulness wise.
me too. I find it extremely interesting what is happening with ETH right now.
This is a speculation hysteria JUGGERNAUT. Now what will happen when it does not scale? Ay Caramba, Once again, there won't be enough popcorn in the universe to go with the ensuing drama.
Opposed to that we have IOTA, which is somehow mostly overlooked by speculators, but which will scale.
Overlooked? It's not released yet and has many speculators. Much more than the over hyped lisk.
That's what makes it so damn sexy. I have more hope for IOTA than Ethereum, value and usefulness wise.
me too. I find it extremely interesting what is happening with ETH right now.
This is a speculation hysteria JUGGERNAUT. Now what will happen when it does not scale? Ay Caramba, Once again, there won't be enough popcorn in the universe to go with the ensuing drama.
Opposed to that we have IOTA, which is somehow mostly overlooked by speculators, but which will scale.
Just to make one thing clear, IOTA is not a Crypto currency! IOTA is a IOT (Internet Of Things) token/platform.
Crypto currency << Gets value by speculators and usage in Monetary system.
IOT token << Gets Value by usage of IOT devices and big company's using and investing in it.
If foundation won't get funded, not only will adoption be near to zero, but most of all will IOTA be copied by other players/company's. And very likely(and fully understandable) will the devs support this.
I a result the IOTA tokens you bought will get meaningless and at most have a market cap of IPO price. More likely though will value drop way below that!
Should the foundation get funded (and preferably "Big Deal" as well), then your chance of making a profit of a magnitude you cant imagine yet will rise drastically.
Nothing is guaranteed, but one thing is for sure, that if foundation wont get funded IOTA wont go any where (at least not with you and me on the boat).
^^Just for those that think there IOTA tokens are to precious to part with. ^^
Crypto currency << Gets value by speculators and usage in Monetary system.
IOT token << Gets Value by usage of IOT devices and big company's using and investing in it.
If foundation won't get funded, not only will adoption be near to zero, but most of all will IOTA be copied by other players/company's. And very likely(and fully understandable) will the devs support this.
I a result the IOTA tokens you bought will get meaningless and at most have a market cap of IPO price. More likely though will value drop way below that!
Should the foundation get funded (and preferably "Big Deal" as well), then your chance of making a profit of a magnitude you cant imagine yet will rise drastically.
Nothing is guaranteed, but one thing is for sure, that if foundation wont get funded IOTA wont go any where (at least not with you and me on the boat).
^^Just for those that think there IOTA tokens are to precious to part with. ^^
That's what makes it so damn sexy. I have more hope for IOTA than Ethereum, value and usefulness wise.
It would be wise to start accepting the IOTA for the Foundation as soon as possible, but I guess this is already in the works?
Dont worry, when IOTA is stable, count on me to let you know 
Yes, as soon as tasting has come to an point where IOTA is stable enough that a role back is very unlikely, a donation address will be published
It would be wise to start accepting the IOTA for the Foundation as soon as possible, but I guess this is already in the works?
Just to make one thing clear, IOTA is not a Crypto currency! IOTA is a IOT (Internet Of Things) token/platform.
Crypto currency << Gets value by speculators and usage in Monetary system.
IOT token << Gets Value by usage of IOT devices and big company's using and investing in it.
If foundation won't get funded, not only will adoption be near to zero, but most of all will IOTA be copied by other players/company's. And very likely(and fully understandable) will the devs support this.
I a result the IOTA tokens you bought will get meaningless and at most have a market cap of IPO price. More likely though will value drop way below that!
Should the foundation get funded (and preferably "Big Deal" as well), then your chance of making a profit of a magnitude you cant imagine yet will rise drastically.
Nothing is guaranteed, but one thing is for sure, that if foundation wont get funded IOTA wont go any where (at least not with you and me on the boat).
^^Just for those that think there IOTA tokens are to precious to part with. ^^
Crypto currency << Gets value by speculators and usage in Monetary system.
IOT token << Gets Value by usage of IOT devices and big company's using and investing in it.
If foundation won't get funded, not only will adoption be near to zero, but most of all will IOTA be copied by other players/company's. And very likely(and fully understandable) will the devs support this.
I a result the IOTA tokens you bought will get meaningless and at most have a market cap of IPO price. More likely though will value drop way below that!
Should the foundation get funded (and preferably "Big Deal" as well), then your chance of making a profit of a magnitude you cant imagine yet will rise drastically.
Nothing is guaranteed, but one thing is for sure, that if foundation wont get funded IOTA wont go any where (at least not with you and me on the boat).
^^Just for those that think there IOTA tokens are to precious to part with. ^^
My up to date sale amounts:
111,181,240,000.00 @ 1 btc cc001
333,543,720,000.00 @ 3btc schnib
222,362,480,000.00 @ 2btc Metaphilibert
111,181,240,000.00 @ 1 btc Yeash20
333,543,720,000.00 @ 3 btc arjen01
166,771,860,000.00 @ 1.5btc MoneyTeam
11,118,124,000.00 @ 0.1btc tk88one
138,976,550,000.00 @ 1.25 btc proto
22,236,248,000.00 @ 0.2 btc adam9910
222,362,480,000.00 @ 2 btc Dexter12
8,894,499,200,000.00 @ 80 Btc bigiotabig
55,590,620,000.00 @ 0.5 Btc Torn
111,181,240,000.00 @ 1 btc zzzman20
111,181,240,000.00 @ 1 btc transpotime21bus
22,236,248,000 @ 0.2 btc adam9910
333,543,720,000.00 @ 3 btc ramsroyal
222,362,480,000.00 @ 2 btc mr001
113,960,771,000 @ 1.025 btc braelis
544,788,076,000 @ 4.9 btc [anon]
55,590,620,000 @ 0.5 btc SupZ
200G @ 2 btc hasseklas
Selling 4,000G IOTA for sale at a rate of 1 BTC == 120G IOTA. Please contact me if you are interested!
let's all give 10 procent
(cfb can take 10% from my genesis account)
imho, give is right thing 4 all, give to, not vote to
(cfb can take 10% from my genesis account)
imho, give is right thing 4 all, give to, not vote to
can we just get a vote from all the iota holders to allocate 5% of their holding to the foundation in the genesis?
there are several advantages to this.
1) it will take into account the opinion of the majority of active stakeholders, which is good enough.
2) if we truly care about the tech and the direction of the project then the future should *only* lie on the hands of those who really care.
3) it will happen at the genesis distribution, so it is much easier than collecting all the pledges.
Also, "calling for donation" is a lengthy and ineffective process because the message and the gravity of the matter may not reach all the targeted audience. while the announcement of a vote and and the voting process will be more effective and more accurately gauging the interest of the active stakeholders.
If we cannot reach the target fund required, we cannot say that the "community" is not interested. because clearly the "Active community" is interested while only the "idle and speculator part" remains inactive and could be counted out. Just like if you do not cast your vote at the election, you lose your say on who will be leading the country (you are even penalised in where i come from).
Apparently, decision on the foundation is an easy one, those remain inactive will do so no matter what we do, so just find a way around them. They will have a few choices, vote no and see their hoard going down the drain OR remain silent and let the majority cast their opinions OR say yes and we move on with a favourable decision.
TLDR; I say we just have a vote using the btc address and nxt address used at the crowdsale. one address for yes and one address for no, anyone interested and eligible should send their corresponding votes,by sending a set amount of btc or nxt (a few cents in fiat term), and we can aggregate the result.
there are several advantages to this.
1) it will take into account the opinion of the majority of active stakeholders, which is good enough.
2) if we truly care about the tech and the direction of the project then the future should *only* lie on the hands of those who really care.
3) it will happen at the genesis distribution, so it is much easier than collecting all the pledges.
Also, "calling for donation" is a lengthy and ineffective process because the message and the gravity of the matter may not reach all the targeted audience. while the announcement of a vote and and the voting process will be more effective and more accurately gauging the interest of the active stakeholders.
If we cannot reach the target fund required, we cannot say that the "community" is not interested. because clearly the "Active community" is interested while only the "idle and speculator part" remains inactive and could be counted out. Just like if you do not cast your vote at the election, you lose your say on who will be leading the country (you are even penalised in where i come from).
Apparently, decision on the foundation is an easy one, those remain inactive will do so no matter what we do, so just find a way around them. They will have a few choices, vote no and see their hoard going down the drain OR remain silent and let the majority cast their opinions OR say yes and we move on with a favourable decision.
TLDR; I say we just have a vote using the btc address and nxt address used at the crowdsale. one address for yes and one address for no, anyone interested and eligible should send their corresponding votes,by sending a set amount of btc or nxt (a few cents in fiat term), and we can aggregate the result.
I agree with voting! I'd like that foundation will take 50m(old) IOTAs!
Let's start voting!
Cheers.
can we just get a vote from all the iota holders to allocate 5% of their holding to the foundation in the genesis?
there are several advantages to this.
1) it will take into account the opinion of the majority of active stakeholders, which is good enough.
2) if we truly care about the tech and the direction of the project then the future should *only* lie on the hands of those who really care.
3) it will happen at the genesis distribution, so it is much easier than collecting all the pledges.
Also, "calling for donation" is a lengthy and ineffective process because the message and the gravity of the matter may not reach all the targeted audience. while the announcement of a vote and and the voting process will be more effective and more accurately gauging the interest of the active stakeholders.
If we cannot reach the target fund required, we cannot say that the "community" is not interested. because clearly the "Active community" is interested while only the "idle and speculator part" remains inactive and could be counted out. Just like if you do not cast your vote at the election, you lose your say on who will be leading the country (you are even penalised in where i come from).
Apparently, decision on the foundation is an easy one, those remain inactive will do so no matter what we do, so just find a way around them. They will have a few choices, vote no and see their hoard going down the drain OR remain silent and let the majority cast their opinions OR say yes and we move on with a favourable decision.
TLDR; I say we just have a vote using the btc address and nxt address used at the crowdsale. one address for yes and one address for no, anyone interested and eligible should send their corresponding votes,by sending a set amount of btc or nxt (a few cents in fiat term), and we can aggregate the result.
there are several advantages to this.
1) it will take into account the opinion of the majority of active stakeholders, which is good enough.
2) if we truly care about the tech and the direction of the project then the future should *only* lie on the hands of those who really care.
3) it will happen at the genesis distribution, so it is much easier than collecting all the pledges.
Also, "calling for donation" is a lengthy and ineffective process because the message and the gravity of the matter may not reach all the targeted audience. while the announcement of a vote and and the voting process will be more effective and more accurately gauging the interest of the active stakeholders.
If we cannot reach the target fund required, we cannot say that the "community" is not interested. because clearly the "Active community" is interested while only the "idle and speculator part" remains inactive and could be counted out. Just like if you do not cast your vote at the election, you lose your say on who will be leading the country (you are even penalised in where i come from).
Apparently, decision on the foundation is an easy one, those remain inactive will do so no matter what we do, so just find a way around them. They will have a few choices, vote no and see their hoard going down the drain OR remain silent and let the majority cast their opinions OR say yes and we move on with a favourable decision.
TLDR; I say we just have a vote using the btc address and nxt address used at the crowdsale. one address for yes and one address for no, anyone interested and eligible should send their corresponding votes,by sending a set amount of btc or nxt (a few cents in fiat term), and we can aggregate the result.
Why not to patent IOTA technology to our company???
Cheers
Cheers
Looks like we got the old chicken and egg problem.
Everyone knows that the egg appeared first, it was an egg of a dinosaur, but with mutations that created a chicken. Does this help to solve our problem?
Damn, that was good spoilsporting. Here's another one to add to the spoilsport bucket:
"Epimenides made an honest mistake."
if they are looking to become foundation members, they should contribute to the funding also: they will have a good price for the iota they buy, I think it's normal they contribute to the foundation funding too.
They may very well do later on, but you have to understand that these are not small companies, they don't care about chump change. For them this is about being at the forefront of a brand new technology and working out how it can improve their business model down the line. Naturally it is in their interest to fund further development etc. of IOTA down the line, but as it stand right now *we* benefit the most from this mutual relationship.
I'm sure people will heavily invest in foundation when big-deal-buyers will be known. So indeed, if big buyers wait for the foundation to be founded before walking out the wood, we have a problem.
Anyway, the foundation is already well founded: how did you get the 50 million old iota number? is it a request of big buyers?
Then the people who are sitting on the fence is truly clueless, no ifs and buts about it. IOTA is already considered one of the major technological achievements of crypto, it's already 20xed pre-launch, it's already got huge companies interested in it. If those achievements are not enough to sway these people and instead they need some sort of additional 'appeal to authority', then they are literally dumb.
Which huge companies are interested?
Like I have said all along: I will not disclose anything until the papers have been signed and the project is guaranteed. I am doing everything I can to avoid vacuous speculation, like I have said since October. Right now the only thing that everyone should focus on is deciding on the Foundation.
if they are looking to become foundation members, they should contribute to the funding also: they will have a good price for the iota they buy, I think it's normal they contribute to the foundation funding too.
They may very well do later on, but you have to understand that these are not small companies, they don't care about chump change. For them this is about being at the forefront of a brand new technology and working out how it can improve their business model down the line. Naturally it is in their interest to fund further development etc. of IOTA down the line, but as it stand right now *we* benefit the most from this mutual relationship.
I'm sure people will heavily invest in foundation when big-deal-buyers will be known. So indeed, if big buyers wait for the foundation to be founded before walking out the wood, we have a problem.
Anyway, the foundation is already well founded: how did you get the 50 million old iota number? is it a request of big buyers?
Then the people who are sitting on the fence is truly clueless, no ifs and buts about it. IOTA is already considered one of the major technological achievements of crypto, it's already 20xed pre-launch, it's already got huge companies interested in it. If those achievements are not enough to sway these people and instead they need some sort of additional 'appeal to authority', then they are literally dumb.
Which huge companies are interested?
Jump to: