Pages:
Author

Topic: IOTA - the scheme is being pumped hard now don't fall for the trap - page 20. (Read 41115 times)

newbie
Activity: 14
Merit: 0
Iota is  the only"coin" who is backed by real big companies such as microsoft,Cisco,Bosch....etc

And iota  has zero Inflation, unlike ethereum

It is the most undervalued Crypto outthere !!!!

How's that market cap looking? Think it just passed the $500M mark on its way down. Seems like it is getting closer to where it always should have been considering how far off anything industry ready it really is. Market cap of $250M or less seems far more reasonable than $1B+.
sr. member
Activity: 448
Merit: 255
Iota is  the only Crypto who is backed by real big companies such as microsoft,Cisco,Bosch....etc

And iota  has zero Inflation, unlike ethereum

It is the most undervalued Crypto outthere !!!!
newbie
Activity: 60
Merit: 0
Instant transactions, quantum proof, no fees, no scability problems, years of development, corporate partnerships, VC investers, foundation members, massive community, no hype (unlike eth with Vitiliks army of shills). You must be pretty a special person if you think Iota is a scam

I am sure you think robots will trade on it too. What corporate sponsors? Whatever you smokin must be some good shi%. Pass the doobie. Puff puff give. Don't mess up the rotation so i can believe this bull too.
newbie
Activity: 60
Merit: 0
Iota

- No blockchain

- No fees

- No scability problems

- Quantum resistant

- Multi billion dollar corporate partnerships



Footballcoin? Really? You dumb fuk

Ya right and you have to do the work validating transactions. Nobody is gonna work for them to do transactions. Thats the dumbest bone head idea I have ever heard of. Whats worse is there is quadzillions of them. Its more then the dam fed printing the US dollar to infinity. It has no value imo. This is only for tech nerds this is not for the average person that is lazy and wants easy ways to do transactions. This is not user friendly. Talking about stupid robots using it. Only tech nerds think this possible. Whatever they smokin let me in on it.
full member
Activity: 336
Merit: 101
Github is not something that most devs use much of the time.  It is really there to provide the open source code for the public.  Any real dev is using a Git server of their own to share with the team or, if there is no team, they may not even need to have up to date code in multiple locations or they use a simpler method.

Git also has some private repositories and Enterprise solutions.

Note: 100% of the devs I know use Github, and mostly the main site with private repositories. (I am based in the Silicon Valley, maybe it is not representative of the global dev community... at least the US one, or maybe I know only bad devs... still overpaid here :-))
legendary
Activity: 2954
Merit: 1159
Github is not something that most devs use much of the time.  It is really there to provide the open source code for the public.  Any real dev is using a Git server of their own to share with the team or, if there is no team, they may not even need to have up to date code in multiple locations or they use a simpler method.

Our old software company put out software for 18 years before we ever touched a github account.  For someone that is working on something and has not finished or released publicly yet, they might as well hang a "steal my idea" sign on the project if they put it on github.  That is a final step and a way to keep the releases up to date for the public, not something that will be used often.
member
Activity: 72
Merit: 10
Can someone give me a list of accounts that would need to be tagged with negative feedback?

No need for that. In a nutshell: the ICO was public indeed (not hyped tho') and lasted for a month. OP missed it, then he asked for a second ICO. CFB refused that and since then Cryptohunter thinks it's a scam. He might or might no right, but AFAIK the IOTA guys put some work into the coin and came up with some real life applications/prototypes, I tend to believe he's wrong on this.

BTW probably it isn't a good investment right now for someone who looking for significant price rise in a short term.

Statement: I have zero (i.e. 0) IOTA, and not planning to change this, so no shilling here.

yes I actually vaguely remember some demented dipshit trying to throw virtual tantrums about a second ICO - turns out the dipshit is this here actual OP!

all documented here:

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.14377191

ah! the arrogance! the hypocrisy!   Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy
legendary
Activity: 1512
Merit: 1000
Can someone give me a list of accounts that would need to be tagged with negative feedback?

No need for that. In a nutshell: the ICO was public indeed (not hyped tho') and lasted for a month. OP missed it, then he asked for a second ICO. CFB refused that and since then Cryptohunter thinks it's a scam. He might or might no right, but AFAIK the IOTA guys put some work into the coin and came up with some real life applications/prototypes, I tend to believe he's wrong on this.

BTW probably it isn't a good investment right now for someone who looking for significant price rise in a short term.

Statement: I have zero (i.e. 0) IOTA, and not planning to change this, so no shilling here.
hero member
Activity: 938
Merit: 559
Did you see that ludicrous display last night?
Can someone give me a list of accounts that would need to be tagged with negative feedback?
Not necessary if you ask me.  IOTA is not the most legitimate coin out there but it's not a "scam" per se, nor is it a pump and dump - it's been trading peer-to-peer for a long time before this exchange release.

IOTA is shit because it requires proof-of-work from each client in order to have "zero fees".  This means that the IoT devices that it claims will connect to it will find it very difficult to use IOTA without doing the PoW, and the battery life would be bad.  I wouldn't recommend it, but it's a project which has been going for a long time and hasn't just appeared out of nowhere like people are claiming.
legendary
Activity: 1190
Merit: 1024
Github is not something that most devs use much of the time.  It is really there to provide the open source code for the public.  Any real dev is using a Git server of their own to share with the team or, if there is no team, they may not even need to have up to date code in multiple locations or they use a simpler method.
newbie
Activity: 70
Merit: 0
Guys i do not care about what ahappened in 2015

Bottomline is: daily volume is 0.2% of market cap. Compared to other currencies, this has ridiculous low volume.
There are very big whales in here that are waiting for order books to fill.
When they dump, this will destroy the price and market cap. (and dont tel me they will not. They made 1000x on their investment. Imagine you had put a thousand bucks and you can sell it for a million. Would you rather not?)


Avoid this like plague. Not per se because founders are scammers (not sure if they are or not), but because of the short simple story i posted above ce.
legendary
Activity: 2674
Merit: 2965
Terminated.
Can someone give me a list of accounts that would need to be tagged with negative feedback?
jr. member
Activity: 95
Merit: 4
The scammier something is, the more likely it's going to increase

People actually look to invest in scams because they know people are ready to be fucked in the cryptospace

In 2-5 years people will be smarter. Until then, let the scamming commence
newbie
Activity: 52
Merit: 0
Compared to Byteball (which is also working with a DAG) as a fast, lightweight speedboat IOTA seems like a big, massy, unmaneuvrable containership regarding not only the technology...
member
Activity: 72
Merit: 10
Just a serious question, I'm having a look at IOTA.

I wonder, Dominik Schiener is a developer, but I don't see how he is a developer all of a sudden?
This is the guy from abondoning the asset holders of Bithaus/NXThaus?
Not able to build or deliver anything practical/useful?


But more important, the lead dev Come-From-Beyond is not doing anything, it seems?
This is the lead dev of the huge IOTA project, but no creation from his side?

https://github.com/Come-from-Beyond





you can find a lineup of the IOTA foundation here:

http://iotasupport.com/foundation_de.shtml


Serguei Popov has developed the mathematical model behind IOTA and largely written the whitepaper.

Sergey Ivancheglo (CfB) is the software engineer that has implemented it in the reference implementation.

Dominik Schiener does API related things and also represents the IOTA foundation externally
  

I am fairly sure that I got that mostly right, correct me anybody if I am wrong

legendary
Activity: 1181
Merit: 1002
Just a serious question, I'm having a look at IOTA.

I wonder, Dominik Schiener is a developer, but I don't see how he is a developer all of a sudden?
This is the guy from abondoning the asset holders of Bithaus/NXThaus?
Not able to build or deliver anything practical/useful?


But more important, the lead dev Come-From-Beyond is not doing anything, it seems?
This is the lead dev of the huge IOTA project, but no creation from his side?

https://github.com/Come-from-Beyond


https://github.com/domschiener

Come-from-Beyond is currently not working on iri, AFAIK.
https://github.com/iotaledger
newbie
Activity: 13
Merit: 0
Just a serious question, I'm having a look at IOTA.

I wonder, Dominik Schiener is a developer, but I don't see how he is a developer all of a sudden?
This is the guy from abondoning the asset holders of Bithaus/NXThaus?
Not able to build or deliver anything practical/useful?


But more important, the lead dev Come-From-Beyond is not doing anything, it seems?
This is the lead dev of the huge IOTA project, but no creation from his side?

https://github.com/Come-from-Beyond



legendary
Activity: 1181
Merit: 1002
^
You see, that's exactly what I mean with talk but don't listen.

But thanks for reminding us all of Footballcoin, again.
legendary
Activity: 2100
Merit: 1167
MY RED TRUST LEFT BY SCUMBAGS - READ MY SIG

This has been covered before. In many threads with cfb and YOU directly.
I never claimed I did not know about the project before the ico. I did not know the ico had taken place or has started.
[...]

I know, it's just an information for everyone who hasn't seen it before.

In my opinion this simply shows, that you should have been well aware of all the goings (because this was a very "slow" thread), but because you talk a lot, but listen little, you have missed the ICO.
I can only speculate on the cause, but probably that's the fate of a signature spammer/troll...

Your opinion/speculation means little zero since you're a known Iota pumping scammer. So since you're known to be an iota insider and will obviously pump/protect your investment/scam at all costs why would anyone take what you say at face value

How much more clear can i make it that it is not about 1 person who is on this board daily actually knowing there is an iota thread somewhere in the ann section??
And far more about the overall awareness of the entire board? who voted they never heard of it whilst they had heard of all the other big icos and many wanted a 2nd round of ico..... i mean was i meant to invest another 7500 BTC myself to make it equal lisk? is that what you are proposing? even if i did then that would still mean the initial distribution would be narrow. You get that right?

Can I make it more simple for you? that is the crux of the matter the stealth like ico in the context of other icos FOR THE ENTIRE BOARD NOT ONE PERSON. Are you starting to get the idea yet? initial distribution is to be wide so as to stop this kind of 2000x ico scam situation you have induced right here the same situation i predicted days after the end of the ICO.

I see a lot of noise but no other explanation of the main points that I have raised. Let me post them here again. I see a lot of excuses and bullshit and still that litecoincollecting imbecile running on about football coin with some diversionary crap and yet he is afraid to make a thread about it because he realises he has no grounding or merit to his blabbering on. Make your own thread and let people know what you think you know?? how much more clear can I be about it. Why are you hiding on this iota thread calling scam about a project that is not related to iota in anyway ?? yes we know you are trying to divert from the topic but still even though this simple ploy of yours has been rumbled you continue to push on with it.

Do you not get it that even if you proved other projects were possible or probable scams or even if they turned out to be scams then it does not mean your project is not a scam. You do realise this do you not?

I challenge you now ltcollector make a thread with corroborating events or something where anyone could relate to your theories and see something in them other than an iota insider or sockpuppet trying to divert from his own devious and self enriching scheme.

I actually want you to make a thread about it to see what you have...... do it now i challenge you. Perhaps the football coin devs will come over and show you want you want to see.

Diverting to other projects instead of tackling the real issues make it look even more like a scam. I see this in the supporters of many scams. Divert to other projects calling them scams or just say everyone who was not in on the scam and objects to the scam are butthurt. That is ALL the arguments you have.

Try something new.

Liquio is stuck on trying to prove one person (from the entire board) knew there was an iota thread.
ltc collector  is more desperate and trying to divert to a non proven scam as if that makes iota to me a proven scammy self enrichment scheme from the same people that did the same with nxt

neither tackles any of the important points i have made and which i will highlight here again and ask for the last time tackle these points and not try to focus on one person nor on other non related projects. Try again.


ltc collector you do realise that you have a far more probable scam in your sig right? I mean you need to bring a lot of evidence to a new thread to bring awareness to this information only you seem privy to proving or even corroborating your theory of footballcoin scam.

I have been told since this thread started that footballcoin ico has almost gone 8x what it had in all the previous weeks. I hope they are going to give me one fucking huge ico token reward for this. I may even share it with you ltc collector if they do you are doing great work for that project.

Then again I await you thread proving it is a scam because all my footballcoin tokens are going to be worth little after you get finished with them right lol....i wonder how long I will be waiting for that thread to be started. I keep waiting and yet you keep disappointing me.


hero member
Activity: 656
Merit: 500
In my opinion this simply shows, that you should have been well aware of all the goings (because this was a very "slow" thread), but because you talk a lot, but listen little, you have missed the ICO.
I can only speculate on the cause, but probably that's the fate of a signature spammer/troll...

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.19629999

Thanks to 2 big investors, we've just passed 716 BTC!

We've been tricked! Well played  Grin
Pages:
Jump to: