BTCAPPLES provided an incredible amount of 'proof' that his shares were being traded. None of which was requested in any meaningful way. Why is that?
I could provide no proof, you would ask me what is my skepticism of proving a few pictures to ease tension is.
I could provide a moderate amount of proof, you would continue to ask me why I refuse to include every feasible piece of evidence and that I have malicious intentions.
I could provide all the proof in the world, and you would tell me how suspicious it is that I provided it without it being asked.
I'll be sure to include as little information as possible from now on to not arise any suspicions, because if the logic
BTCAPPLES provided an incredible amount of 'proof' that his shares were being traded. None of which was requested in any meaningful way. Why is that?
is credible, then I serve no purpose in justifying my actions.
This is just something that I should do according to you, but I intend on answering everyone's questions with as much detail and "incredible amounts of 'proof'" as possible.