Pages:
Author

Topic: Is a campaign manager responsible for preventing low quality posting? - page 3. (Read 827 times)

legendary
Activity: 3766
Merit: 4554
Contact @yahoo62278 on telegram for marketing
Please correct me if I am wrong but I believe the answer is yes. However there are campaigns out there in which the managers only look at the number of posts in the profiles, so it is clear that they are not bothering to read any of the posts. Should those campaigns be allowed? Does anyone know any of those campaigns?

If the campaign manager is only looking at the number of posts a user has when they go to grade the campaign and subtracting it from the number they had the previous week, then that manager is severely screwing over campaign participants.

The moderators have been doing an excellent job lately and deleting or locking a bunch of the mega spam threads making users posts counts change drastically throughout each week. So the managers, if they're doing their jobs correctly, should be opening each and every users profile and getting the post counts correct for each week. This also will allow them to take a glance at what a user is or has been posting.

member
Activity: 240
Merit: 10
Those campaign managers aren't going to waste their time reading every post.  Most of them are lazy and will just look at the post count.  The people with signatures always have the worst posts. They don't even contribute to the conversation they just post for their sig campaign.
legendary
Activity: 2366
Merit: 1624
Do not die for Putin
Please correct me if I am wrong but I believe the answer is yes. However there are campaigns out there in which the managers only look at the number of posts in the profiles, so it is clear that they are not bothering to read any of the posts. Should those campaigns be allowed? Does anyone know any of those campaigns?
Pages:
Jump to: