Pages:
Author

Topic: Is a passworded WINRAR file an effective encryption method? - page 2. (Read 14899 times)

jr. member
Activity: 42
Merit: 1
7-Zip uses iterated SHA-256 as its key derivation function. This is weak against hardware brute force attacks. If your password really is 18 randomish characters, you should be fine. If it's one English word with a few digits before or after it, you are theoretically vulnerable to that kind of attack.

Are you sure? The version I have (Ver 9.20) says AES-256. And yes, 18 random chars.
legendary
Activity: 1222
Merit: 1016
Live and Let Live
WINRAR is fine... providing you use a secure password...

The password search space for a Uppercas, Lowercase, Digit, and Symbols 12 digit password is 5.46 x 10^23

That would take over 100 years at one hundred trillion guesses per second.  (10x the power of the entire bitcoin network).

useful link: https://www.grc.com/%5Chaystack.htm
legendary
Activity: 1596
Merit: 1012
Democracy is vulnerable to a 51% attack.
7-Zip has 256 bit AES. I'm using that with an 18 char password and storing my wallet completely and permanently offline, so I'm sleeping pretty well at night Wink

Now I just have to fill it with a few BTC haha!
7-Zip uses iterated SHA-256 as its key derivation function. This is weak against hardware brute force attacks. If your password really is 18 randomish characters, you should be fine. If it's one English word with a few digits before or after it, you are theoretically vulnerable to that kind of attack.

On the bright side, you don't really have to worry about someone stealing your wallet today and then breaking it in ten years when the computing power is available to do so. Shortly before the time any encryption scheme you ever used to protect your wallet becomes vulnerable to an attack (due to increasing computing power, a newly-discovered flaw, or whatever), you can simply transfer all your BitCoins to a brand new wallet using an encryption scheme that is stronger.
jr. member
Activity: 42
Merit: 1
7-Zip has 256 bit AES. I'm using that with an 18 char password and storing my wallet completely and permanently offline, so I'm sleeping pretty well at night Wink

Now I just have to fill it with a few BTC haha!
legendary
Activity: 1596
Merit: 1012
Democracy is vulnerable to a 51% attack.
This friend I know  Roll Eyes is using winrar to encrypt his wallets with fairly long passwords.
How secure is winrars password encryption, and what's the next most convenient and more reliable form of file encryption?
How long is fairly long? The weak link would be a brute-force attack, and the plausibility of that will directly depend on how many passwords someone would have to try to get to his.  There already exists hardware used by law enforcement to brute force WinRAR passwords.
http://www.forensic-computers.com/TACC1441.php
hero member
Activity: 700
Merit: 500
Go with TrueCrypt.

I know this shouldn't matter, but I think it would be weird to protect something so valuable with a program everyone has on their desktop.   I am not sure why I feel like it matters to me, but it does, I can't find the logic in it yet.

Only annoying part is that you have to create a volume that is big enough, because re-sizing isn't really possible (I've saw somewhere about someone having a 150MB+ wallet.dat file)

Just create a 1gb volume and have the entire bitcoin datadir in that.
XIU
member
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
Go with TrueCrypt.

I know this shouldn't matter, but I think it would be weird to protect something so valuable with a program everyone has on their desktop.   I am not sure why I feel like it matters to me, but it does, I can't find the logic in it yet.

Only annoying part is that you have to create a volume that is big enough, because re-sizing isn't really possible (I've saw somewhere about someone having a 150MB+ wallet.dat file)
hero member
Activity: 560
Merit: 500
Go with TrueCrypt.

I know this shouldn't matter, but I think it would be weird to protect something so valuable with a program everyone has on their desktop.   I am not sure why I feel like it matters to me, but it does, I can't find the logic in it yet.

Well, just in case my grandma wants to brute force it  Cheesy
hero member
Activity: 630
Merit: 500
Posts: 69
Go with TrueCrypt.

I know this shouldn't matter, but I think it would be weird to protect something so valuable with a program everyone has on their desktop.   I am not sure why I feel like it matters to me, but it does, I can't find the logic in it yet.
XIU
member
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
WinRAR uses an ineffective encryption standard (afaik).

128bit AES... yeah, sure - very ineffective. NOT!

Ok goshh, they didn't use aes last time I used it.

It has changed since v3.0, so together with a strong password, it'll be secure enough for some time Smiley
hero member
Activity: 700
Merit: 500
WinRAR uses an ineffective encryption standard (afaik).

128bit AES... yeah, sure - very ineffective. NOT!

Ok goshh, they didn't use aes last time I used it.
legendary
Activity: 2618
Merit: 1007
WinRAR uses an ineffective encryption standard (afaik).

128bit AES... yeah, sure - very ineffective. NOT!
hero member
Activity: 700
Merit: 500
WinRAR uses an ineffective encryption standard (afaik). Tell him to use truecrypt.
hero member
Activity: 560
Merit: 500
This friend I know  Roll Eyes is using winrar to encrypt his wallets with fairly long passwords.
How secure is winrars password encryption, and what's the next most convenient and more reliable form of file encryption?
Pages:
Jump to: