Pages:
Author

Topic: Is anyone willing to help me? - page 2. (Read 407 times)

legendary
Activity: 4522
Merit: 3426
July 06, 2023, 06:12:48 PM
#5
Running the same software is not a problem, as long as the consensus rules that this software are decentralized.
Agreed. If we couldn't trust Bitcoin Core, we'd have bigger problems to worry about. And even if the developers ever go evil and add bad stuff, we'll just stick to the older version and go from there.

The problem is not just trust. If everyone is running the same software then there is a risk of a serious bug that could take down the entire network. With multiple implementations, that risk is limited.
legendary
Activity: 3290
Merit: 16489
Thick-Skinned Gang Leader and Golden Feather 2021
July 06, 2023, 06:29:13 AM
#4
Running the same software is not a problem, as long as the consensus rules that this software are decentralized.
Agreed. If we couldn't trust Bitcoin Core, we'd have bigger problems to worry about. And even if the developers ever go evil and add bad stuff, we'll just stick to the older version and go from there.
legendary
Activity: 1568
Merit: 6660
bitcoincleanup.com / bitmixlist.org
July 06, 2023, 05:29:40 AM
#3
Creating a full-node is very hard work which is akin to maintaining a large enterprise software repository. That's probably why you don't see that many Bitcoin clients popping up everywhere. Unlike, say, Ethereum, where it is companies who are the ones maintaining all the different reference clients.

But if you're still looking for an alternate full node client, you can use Bitcoin Knots (by luke dash-jr). I cannot vouch for it though, as I have never used it.
legendary
Activity: 2352
Merit: 6089
bitcoindata.science
July 05, 2023, 12:49:37 PM
#2
I am a fan of Bitcoin, I believe that to maintain the robustness of the Bitcoin network, independent and distinct full-node clients are particularly important. Imagine how horrible it would be if all the nodes of Bitcoin used the same software, the same version. Can Bitcoin still talk about decentralization?I noticed that libbitcoin, a standalone full-node client for Bitcoin, now has only one node running. I have a cloud server that runs bitcoin full node all year round, running bitcoin core software, and would like to switch to "libbitcoin". My cloud server is Windows operating system. I downloaded the related software for libbitcoin, but it does not work, prompting me to initialize it first. I still can't run this client after a lot of effort, is anyone willing to help me?

Running the same software is not a problem, as long as the consensus rules that this software are decentralized.  Nobody really has the power to chance those consensus rules alone.

And there are also dozens of different bitcoin nodes, not only core. There are many spv wallets, prune nodes,  other full nodes implementations, etc...

Why do you want to run libbitcoin?

If you want to run a full node, you should run bitcoin core which is the most used one, unless you really need something else.
https://bitcoincore.org/en/download

 bitcoin is the most decentralized cryptocurrency that exists and there are thousands of full nodes running 24/7
newbie
Activity: 5
Merit: 0
July 05, 2023, 08:38:16 AM
#1
I am a fan of Bitcoin, I believe that to maintain the robustness of the Bitcoin network, independent and distinct full-node clients are particularly important. Imagine how horrible it would be if all the nodes of Bitcoin used the same software, the same version. Can Bitcoin still talk about decentralization?I noticed that libbitcoin, a standalone full-node client for Bitcoin, now has only one node running. I have a cloud server that runs bitcoin full node all year round, running bitcoin core software, and would like to switch to "libbitcoin". My cloud server is Windows operating system. I downloaded the related software for libbitcoin, but it does not work, prompting me to initialize it first. I still can't run this client after a lot of effort, is anyone willing to help me?
Pages:
Jump to: