It's not wrong to ask for feedback but one shouldn't demand it or have an exchange (if I give you feedback, you also need to give me feedback). There are many members who actually do that just to build up trust. One should leave feedback if he/she wishes to and in fact not when asked to leave. It's important to not leave feedback just after 1-2 trades as it hurts the trust system if the user abuses it and scams another member.
I would disagree with this. If one person took on zero risk in a transaction then it would be less appropriate to leave trust feedback while if money was risked then a positive rating is almost certainly appropriate. Even if only one trade was done then it would be appropriate to leave trust if money was risked while this would not be the case if no money was risked.
Anyone specifically trading with someone just for the trust that comes with the trade should not receive positive trust and is highly suspicious in my book.
Here you emphasize that trust should be based on the amount of risk undertaken by a party. But just a few posts above you emphasize that this is
trust feedback system not a
trade feedback system. These two viewpoints are incommensurate. In your first opinion you suggest that people can leave feedback for any cause, no matter the risk. The latter opinion tries to correlate the validity of trust with the risk involved. How can you hold both these conflicting opinions simultaneously (or are you just posting to increase your signature pay?---NB: I only add this paranthetical because that is exactly what you have done to me many times when I disagree with you---more recently you took it to even greater extremes, leaving me negative feedback multiple times from multiple accounts just because I disagreed with you).
If you
risked a large amount of money when trading with someone then you obviously needed to
trust them enough to take such a risk. If you take risk with someone then there is no way around the fact that you trust them.
Giving trust because of risk taken is one reason why giving a trust rating is appropriate, however is not the only reason why one is appropriate.
Giving a trust rating when zero is risked, especially for very small transactions makes no sense because you did not need to
trust them to engage in such trades.
Great, got it. So you shouldn't give feedback when you don't risk something, I see.
There are other non-trading reasons to give trust feedback, e.g. you witness someone engaging in trustworthy behavior and/or scammy behavior and/or witness them scamming and/or them admitting to scamming (as in your case).
You are outright lying here. It's doubtful that you were even on the forums 2.5 years ago when TF accused me. How would you have "witnessed" anything? Taking the word of a known scammer isn't witnessing.
I personally find it hard to believe that someone could possibly be thickheaded enough to seriously not see this conclusion based on my posts and the only reasonable conclusion as to the reason for you comments would be that you are trying to stir up trouble
You're cute! I know you can't resist the
ad hominem, but it's fun that you've changed your signature "you are an idiot" for the more Charlie Brown style "thickheaded". With respect to stirring up trouble, is that what you were doing to me when you trolled me on multiple threads with multiple acounts and left multiple negative feedbacks for me using multiple accounts in a (failed) attempt to get me kicked out of a signature ad campaign?
