Not quite, he is saying that it depends on # of buyers vs. # of sellers at any given moment. Speculation creates value, and this in turn creates more demand, mainstream media attention, etc.
The amount of Bitcoin being bought is always the same as the amount being sold. All that "more buyers" or "more sellers" means is that the prices are changing to reflect what people are willing to buy/sell it for. Shortening it to buyers vs. sellers would be an oversimplification.
There are no "fundamentals" in Bitcoin in that nothing really pegs the price down and it does what it wants. There could be a very slow increase over several months which was still a bubble, and there could also be a very slow decline which was not a death - you're right in that regard - but if merchant adoption doesn't match these trends, the increases are speculation-fuelled and are not "real" growth.
When the price just doubled in the past couple months, which of those buyers actually intended to spend Bitcoin in stores? If the answer is not a lot, then the price growth is just a self-fulfilling prophecy, and will end as soon as people feel like they won't get rich. That kind of media attention is extremely unhealthy because as soon as Bitcoin's price is going down, they turn on us and so does the market.
Yup, that's the disadvantage of it. Like how they say you'd know which alt would be crashing soon when you see it being shilled here in the forum as well as trollboxes.
I just try to be more optimistic as I can. Though I probably wouldn't be able to buy in bulk during crashes, I just keep telling myself that somehow, others manage to buy low and stay for the next cycle.
I'm not sure about the microtransactions. I know very little of how most of the tech works but it really would be helpful if people can also freely spend their bitcoins without much worry of delays and high fees. That could actually encourage more merchant to accept them, increasing penetration in the mind of the public.