Topic: Is bitcoin a religion? - page 13. (Read 6768 times)
LOL. bitcoin is far my religion. Satoshi is not supernatural being. Although Satoshi remained to be a mystery, he doesn't qualify to be a or possess any supernatural character. We may have followed what he has started and uses it today but it doesn't mean he is a so called "God". Even our belief on the scaling issue is different and there is no universal consensus prove that bitcoin is not a religion. As I said before, we just have to enjoy what he has started which is bitcoin and use it to what purpose it has to served us.
Bitcoin in my opinion is the currency of the future. To religion it has nothing unless of course you are not God. But if so, then you are a heathen and worshiped many gods. Currency in the world a lot.
I would not agree that Bitcoin is a religion, because for something to be a religion you need something that you believe in to, like higher force or something. And Bitcoin is non of that. Bitcoin is made by humans, so it can't be more than human product. It is maintained by humans and used by they also. There is nothing supernatural about bitcoin that can be worshiped as God or something. That is my opinion at least.
I don't think that bitcoin is a religion. Because religion deceives people. Bitcoin is not lying. If he is what he is.
No. Bitcoin it's not a religion. Its just an extraordinary cryptocurrency. Yeah ,because bitcoin is the most powerful among the others.
Bitcoin, itself, is not a religion. At this stage of the Bitcoin game, there are some who act like it is a religion for them.
Satoshism
Quote
7.25.3.6.5 (02-23-1999)
Religious Belief Defined
The term "religious" as used in IRC 501(c)(3) is not subject to precise definition. The leading interpretation of the term was made by the Supreme Court in United States v. Seeger, 380 U.S. 163 (1965), in which the Court interpreted the phrase "religious training and belief" as used in the Universal Military Training and Service Act, 50 U.S.C. section 456 (j), in determining an individual’s eligibility for exemption from military service on religious grounds. The Court formulated the following definition: "A sincere and meaningful belief which occupies in the life of its possessor a place parallel to that filled by the God of those admittedly qualifying for the exemption comes within the statutory definition."
The Court elaborated upon the Seeger definition in Welsh v. United States, 398 U.S. 33 (1970), stating that "f an individual deeply and sincerely holds beliefs that are purely ethical or moral in source and content but that nevertheless impose upon him a duty of conscience to refrain from participating in any war at any time, those beliefs certainly occupy in the life of that individual a place parallel to that filled by... God in the lives of traditionally religious persons." Thus, religious beliefs include many beliefs (for example, Taoism, Buddhism, and Secular Humanism) that do not posit the existence of a Supreme Being in the conventional sense.
Religious Belief Defined
The term "religious" as used in IRC 501(c)(3) is not subject to precise definition. The leading interpretation of the term was made by the Supreme Court in United States v. Seeger, 380 U.S. 163 (1965), in which the Court interpreted the phrase "religious training and belief" as used in the Universal Military Training and Service Act, 50 U.S.C. section 456 (j), in determining an individual’s eligibility for exemption from military service on religious grounds. The Court formulated the following definition: "A sincere and meaningful belief which occupies in the life of its possessor a place parallel to that filled by the God of those admittedly qualifying for the exemption comes within the statutory definition."
The Court elaborated upon the Seeger definition in Welsh v. United States, 398 U.S. 33 (1970), stating that "f an individual deeply and sincerely holds beliefs that are purely ethical or moral in source and content but that nevertheless impose upon him a duty of conscience to refrain from participating in any war at any time, those beliefs certainly occupy in the life of that individual a place parallel to that filled by... God in the lives of traditionally religious persons." Thus, religious beliefs include many beliefs (for example, Taoism, Buddhism, and Secular Humanism) that do not posit the existence of a Supreme Being in the conventional sense.
http://www.irs.gov/irm/part7/irm_07-025-003.html
No. Doesn't have a supernatural element (you can jokingly place Satoshi here), or a sacred/profane division. Lacks many other characteristics of a religion is well.
It could be defined as a social movement, however.
Currency = religion?
there is something wrong with thoughts in your head, this is indeed true, dude !!!
most global human opted for atheists and just assume currency is the best source of happiness in this world, the mindset of hedonic've messed up all physical elements in their bodies.
there is something wrong with thoughts in your head, this is indeed true, dude !!!
most global human opted for atheists and just assume currency is the best source of happiness in this world, the mindset of hedonic've messed up all physical elements in their bodies.
I'll answer a question with a question: Is USD or EURO a religion? Bitcoin is no religion, it is a decentralized currency. Although there seems to be a lot of people who treat it as a religion.
Bitcoin is the only religion which unites people. They are the representatives of all religions and atheists. We argue among themselves there is a God or not, but bitcoin is all we recognize. Maybe our God is a bitcoin?
No its not but Satoshi can be a religious figure if people want to worship whoever he is.
Well no one considers facebook, or twitter or tge dollar as a form of religion. It doesn't mean that if a lot of people is fond or is using it it can pass as something that's being worshipped. People use these things to better their lives much like their use of bitcoin
No its not but Satoshi can be a religious figure if people want to worship whoever he is.
It's not, unless you're a Bitcoinmaximus. And even then, probably not.
Religion is different for everybody. People can go to the same church, read out of the same holy book, and never have the same understanding of their religion.
Because of this, some people have a religion in Bitcoin, and in others Bitcoin is only a part of their religion of life. Those who don't know about Bitcoin certainly don't have a religion in it.
Because of this, some people have a religion in Bitcoin, and in others Bitcoin is only a part of their religion of life. Those who don't know about Bitcoin certainly don't have a religion in it.
Let's be honest, it does have all the makings of a religion, let me just go through the list:
. Mysterious creator that has suddenly vanished off the face of the Earth or doesn't exist - Check
. Celebrities are endorsing it to give it more legitimacy - Check
. Multiple sects splitting off from the main beliefs because they disagree with them or want to form their own cult instead - Check
. Lots and lots of conspiracy theories surrounding it - Check
. Persecution from government organisations that fear it - Check
. Crazy evangelical fringe believers who run around and try to harass people into following it - Check
. Extremely negative mass media attention - Check
Yep, I'd say we're a religion now
. Mysterious creator that has suddenly vanished off the face of the Earth or doesn't exist - Check
. Celebrities are endorsing it to give it more legitimacy - Check
. Multiple sects splitting off from the main beliefs because they disagree with them or want to form their own cult instead - Check
. Lots and lots of conspiracy theories surrounding it - Check
. Persecution from government organisations that fear it - Check
. Crazy evangelical fringe believers who run around and try to harass people into following it - Check
. Extremely negative mass media attention - Check
Yep, I'd say we're a religion now
This.
Extremely well put sir.
The thinking isn't far off...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?edit=vd&v=xnnOtdOcOFk
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/max-keiser-bitcoin-millionaire-heralds-satoshis-bitcoin-as-cyber-christ-151820
http://www.youtube.com/watch?edit=vd&v=xnnOtdOcOFk
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/max-keiser-bitcoin-millionaire-heralds-satoshis-bitcoin-as-cyber-christ-151820
"Bitcoin Millionaire" Max Keiser passionately heralds a 'second coming' in the form of "Cyber Christ", Bitcoin and its anonymous founder Satoshi Nakamoto.
I did laugh my ass off with joy, and actually agree with the sentiment.
Bitcoin has come to free us all with competition against the unchallenged, monopolistic Federal Reserve System.
Cyber Christ has returned, just like all those religions said he would
I did laugh my ass off with joy, and actually agree with the sentiment.
Bitcoin has come to free us all with competition against the unchallenged, monopolistic Federal Reserve System.
Cyber Christ has returned, just like all those religions said he would
Funny you say that (and now that I've checked the youtube video).
Did you know that there existed a Pope that apparently had the gift of prophecy, back in the 12th Century. He predicted numerous popes through the centuries with often amazing accuracy (though not always correct). However, of note, he predicted the previous 6 Popes spot on, and then after these 6;
"The list ends with a pope identified as "Peter the Roman", whose pontificate will allegedly bring the destruction of the city of Rome and usher in the beginning of the Apocalypse."
Who is the now the next pope, and I believe it was 2 days after that youtube video was made that it was official.
The Prophecy of Malachi - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prophecy_of_the_Popes
Seriously, it exists, check it out.
I know the Vatican got taken over by the global banking empire during Napoleon's time, and I do think the Vatican has had a hand in altering 'stuff' and screwing around with stuff (I mean, religion, c'mon). So I expect the truth is actually the opposite of 'anti-christ', pfft, more like it was something like a positive great thing, but vatican and such changed it in the public view 'just in case' there was any truth to it and some dodgy geezer with strange powers appeared
I'm pretty much an atheist btw, but you gotta admit this shit is weird
"Ayn Rand, with trappings"
Let's be honest, it does have all the makings of a religion, let me just go through the list:
. Mysterious creator that has suddenly vanished off the face of the Earth or doesn't exist - Check
. Celebrities are endorsing it to give it more legitimacy - Check
. Multiple sects splitting off from the main beliefs because they disagree with them or want to form their own cult instead - Check
. Lots and lots of conspiracy theories surrounding it - Check
. Persecution from government organisations that fear it - Check
. Crazy evangelical fringe believers who run around and try to harass people into following it - Check
. Extremely negative mass media attention - Check
Yep, I'd say we're a religion now
. Mysterious creator that has suddenly vanished off the face of the Earth or doesn't exist - Check
. Celebrities are endorsing it to give it more legitimacy - Check
. Multiple sects splitting off from the main beliefs because they disagree with them or want to form their own cult instead - Check
. Lots and lots of conspiracy theories surrounding it - Check
. Persecution from government organisations that fear it - Check
. Crazy evangelical fringe believers who run around and try to harass people into following it - Check
. Extremely negative mass media attention - Check
Yep, I'd say we're a religion now
At first I was like:
But then I
and now I'm like:
Let's be honest, it does have all the makings of a religion, let me just go through the list:
. Mysterious creator that has suddenly vanished off the face of the Earth or doesn't exist - Check
. Celebrities are endorsing it to give it more legitimacy - Check
. Multiple sects splitting off from the main beliefs because they disagree with them or want to form their own cult instead - Check
. Lots and lots of conspiracy theories surrounding it - Check
. Persecution from government organisations that fear it - Check
. Crazy evangelical fringe believers who run around and try to harass people into following it - Check
. Extremely negative mass media attention - Check
Yep, I'd say we're a religion now
. Mysterious creator that has suddenly vanished off the face of the Earth or doesn't exist - Check
. Celebrities are endorsing it to give it more legitimacy - Check
. Multiple sects splitting off from the main beliefs because they disagree with them or want to form their own cult instead - Check
. Lots and lots of conspiracy theories surrounding it - Check
. Persecution from government organisations that fear it - Check
. Crazy evangelical fringe believers who run around and try to harass people into following it - Check
. Extremely negative mass media attention - Check
Yep, I'd say we're a religion now
Jump to: