Pages:
Author

Topic: Is Bitcoin getting the wrong kind of attention? - page 2. (Read 1874 times)

legendary
Activity: 2352
Merit: 1064
Bitcoin is antisemitic
As we all know, the authorities have a fine tradition of doing the sensible thing and being quick to understand and embrace emerging technologies and wouldn't, for instance, freeze the accounts of every exchange they can find and issue a press release stating they have crippled underground trading by closing the accounts used to channel funds into these criminal organizations...

Another good reason to stay clear from centralized exchanges as much as possible. I expect a similar move any time from now on.
I just hope that the GLBSE has a good backup plan up and ready.

and if anything as heavy handed as that should happen, what does bitcoin have in its defense, what does it have to present to Joe Public as a legal and legitimate usage?

Are we already at the point of having to prove one's innocence?
Yes, I know. My suggestion is to stay as much underground as possible anyway, always deny everything to the "authorithies", and try to keep confidential info confidential.

if the powers that be choose to attack it and close down every exchange development will continue but it will be a big setback to its growth and a huge pain in the butt.

I would see this as free publicity. Many ppl are smarter than that and appreciate real value. In any case if TPTB were not able to stop any form of cybercrime, you can figure what could they do about BTCs.
hero member
Activity: 1078
Merit: 502
^ Good first post!



They should legalize the sale and consumption of certain ilicit drugs.... end of story Tongue
newbie
Activity: 14
Merit: 0
An attack on the exchanges and individual accounts would violate U.S. and International law. It would violate U.S. due process laws to seize the account without first being able to prove suspicion illegal activities associated with the account. Also, cited in the article below, this kind of attack would violate WTO agreements.

Online poker would be a comparable case. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Scheinberg In this case however the primary and only purpose of having an account is for illegal gambling; this is not the case with Bitcoin.


I am not a lawyer.
237
sr. member
Activity: 264
Merit: 250
They just fear Bitcoin, because its not easy to controll.

Everything that Bitcoin is and can be done with it, applies to cash as well.
Just that BTC is harder to fake.
They will keep trying to discredit BTC and, if they succeed other chains.
All the community can do, is creating honest trading-platforms and promote
crypt.cur. as independent, global and great oppertunity.

#237#
sr. member
Activity: 317
Merit: 1012
Man it feels so long since I wrote this, shame to delete it as it was about silkroad and the trouble it might bring down on Bitcoin in those early single-digit days. But whatever, that and lots of other shit happened and Bitcoin's still ticking along nicely... or is it? If you're reading this, well, it might pop up briefly on the "new posts" page after editing but you're more likely interested in my post history for whatever reason so thanks for taking an interest and onwards.

Bitcoin, what a work of genius, we really thought it could make it all happen, break the stranglehold and bring us to a better world without the banks. But then something strange happened, all of a sudden we had stability on the exchanges, ex-banking execs in big startups in the crypto space, interest all the way from the US senate to Paypay and something didn't quite look right.

Move on a while and the banks themselves are getting all friendly but I'm getting a little ahead of myself, I forgot to mention the alt spam. Pages and pages of the damn things, so many you had to put the alt section of this place on ignore 'cos it was all you'd see when checking new posts and if there was any trace of innovation amongst the damn things it'd be buried amongst a hundred shitcoin clones. One made it through the rabble though and we shook our heads in wonder and uttered a collective wtf?! at its rise. Doge, a litecoin clone backed by the full faith and credit of a meme.

Where's all this going? Well, long story short, we missed the ball, we'd let trust based exchanges flourish with no proof of reserves, hundreds of BTC walk away in hacks and heists and to cap it all off we'd let a fscking meme take coins off kids. It gets worse, we shouted and yelled while this was going on but to no avail and then we started to get close to Bitcoins networks limitations and this is where it gets really nasty, even worse than stealing coins from kids.

We tried to discuss it rationally, throw ideas around and see what came out of it but all the time there was a yell and yammer getting louder and louder until rational discussion became impossible and any future chance of rational discussion stood no hope, the devs couldn't utter a word. Sorry, we dropped the ball, the biggest player won the whole pot on the markets and then they killed any hope of evolution, they wanted the inefficiencies kept in because that's where the profit is.

Oh doom and gloom and woe is us, lets pack our bags and go home. Lol, you cant kill ideas that easily, the idea moved on and Bitcoin blew the door wide open for them. Look to the idea, it's out there and its wild and free, we're coming to get you squiddy Wink

Quote
The Times 03/Jan/2009 Chancellor on brink of second bailout for banks

Pages:
Jump to: