Pages:
Author

Topic: Is Bitcoin truly losing its identity? - page 2. (Read 492 times)

sr. member
Activity: 756
Merit: 356
December 05, 2024, 07:17:43 AM
#26
Bitcoin was an anonymous currency, a decade ago it was almost impossible to track Bitcoin transactions but now we have found that there are flaws and blockchain analysis companies are getting better with tracking.
We had a KYC-free service years ago and now almost every bitcoin-related business asks their users to submit KYC documents.
Years ago we could mine Bitcoin at home but today it's a commercial business and only big mining companies can mine it.
Bitcoin mixers were legal and now you are a criminal if you use them.
Decentralized Exchanges are also getting banned.
What's the next step?
This is why I think that Bitcoin is losing its identity.

These things you mentioned do not prove that bitcoin has lost its identity. Bitcoin is still what it was when it was first created. It is still a decentralised currency that can be transferred across any person irrespective of border. Bitcoin is still not owned or controlled by a single entity, it is still controlled by the market. Bitcoin supply is still limited so there is no inflation with bitcoin.

How people use bitcoin is not what defines it, it's what it is that defines it. People said bitcoin was bad because it was used for illegal activities, is that what bitcoin is?
You can still transfer Bitcoin via peer-to-peer without any centralised exchange; that hasn't changed. The fact that people prefer to use centralised exchanges does not diminish Bitcoin's decentralised nature.

Btw, bitcoin transactions being transparent is one of the may great features of  bicoin.
legendary
Activity: 2100
Merit: 1042
HODL
December 05, 2024, 06:52:45 AM
#25
Bitcoin is not losing its identity, it’s only innovating to become more effective and productive.

"Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System" - Source: https://bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf

It lost it's identity long time ago, right now it's "Bitcoin: A CeX-to-CeX Electronic Real-Estate System" - or as I call it: doodoo.

To be fair, if we rely on the original purpose that satoshi created it for, it is clear that bitcoin has lost its identity, it is just that many people do not want to admit this so they say that it has not lost its identity.

But in my opinion, that is not so important. Even though it didn't become the currency it was originally intended to be, it still benefits us and the world, which is what matters. Bitcoin is an asset, an investment and it has changed many people's lives for the better. It helps us realize the importance of privacy and having complete control over our assets...For me, that's enough, we shouldn't be too greedy and ask for too much.
Instead of being concerned with whether it is being used for its original purpose, we should be concerned with the benefits it brings and the use cases it can bring.
sr. member
Activity: 1400
Merit: 268
Enjoy 500% bonus + 70 FS
December 05, 2024, 06:27:06 AM
#24
Bitcoin has always been viewed not only as currency for exchange but also to perceive value, pretty much similar to the USD, which is functioning as both an asset and a currency. Even in their early days, many had invested in Bitcoin with prospects for appreciation. Countries like El Salvador expose Bitcoin for its dual usage as legal tender and a tool for long term investment.

Although volatility and uncertain regulatory positions are testing Bitcoin for mainstream adoption, that does not strip Bitcoin of utility.  Bitcoin has evolved into many usecases, including as an essential part of DeFi and probably many more in the new era of financial world. This extends from the initial ethos of decentralization and financial sovereignty that the underlying cryptocurrency represents, which proves Bitcoin is adapting, not dying.

I also used to extremely against Bitcoin as a speculative assets, but I think we need to accept the reality that when Bitcoin is widely adopted and highly demanded, it will always become a tool for speculative investors, and it doesn't mean that Bitcoin is not used as a decentralized currency whcih is the original purpose.
hero member
Activity: 1190
Merit: 901
Livecasino.io
December 05, 2024, 06:11:28 AM
#23
How many times are we going to keep on emphasizing that we may not have to totally agrees with what other people are saying over the internet about bitcoin, a normal person who has the knowledge of what bitcoin is and how it was been invented by it creator will not come up with the idea of it losing its identity without having anything to back things up, so far so good, bitcoin is both an investment asset and a digital currency which is decentralized and there is nothing anyone can do about these than to let it remain as it has always been.
I agree with you. The person who came to the conclusion that bitcoin is losing its identity is only quite ignorant (not in an abusive intention) of what is happening or that person chose to ignore it and come to the conclusion just to gain some attention. Even if the person don't want to read just ask one of those AI agents and your answers will be provided in less than a minute. As at today bitcoin's price is over $100k when the topic was created its price was over $95k. The other day the president of Russia was talking about bitcoin. Theres' also a debate about bitcoin being a reserve asset for some countries. What more do we need to write or what evidence is needed to show just to prove a point, well none is needed.
hero member
Activity: 2856
Merit: 644
https://duelbits.com/
December 04, 2024, 04:06:37 PM
#22
I feel that instead of bitcoin losing its identity, they are now developing in a more positive direction because they are now not only considered as a digital currency that can be used as a payment option but also as a form of savings and investment that is very good to do because of its value and price.

I don't really care what other people think about bitcoin because in the end, things like this depend on each person's mindset and opinion so when it comes to viewpoints, it is clear that everyone can express what they think without us intervening.
But on the other hand, by looking at this, of course we realize that we also have our own thoughts on bitcoin so that what others say will not have any impact if we are sure of the choice that being in bitcoin is very right for us.

jr. member
Activity: 28
Merit: 37
December 04, 2024, 03:54:51 PM
#21
Bitcoin is not losing its identity, it’s only innovating to become more effective and productive.

"Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System" - Source: https://bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf

It lost it's identity long time ago, right now it's "Bitcoin: A CeX-to-CeX Electronic Real-Estate System" - or as I call it: doodoo.
hero member
Activity: 3094
Merit: 606
BTC to the MOON in 2019
December 04, 2024, 03:52:17 PM
#20
Bitcoin is not losing its identity, it’s only innovating to become more effective and productive. In fact, it becomes even more valuable than just sticking to only one method. The important thing is, bitcoin can actively perform in both ways, to act as an asset when needed and to be considered as a currency in countries where bitcoin is accepted as a payment method.
hero member
Activity: 714
Merit: 521
DGbet.fun - Crypto Sportsbook
December 04, 2024, 02:44:44 PM
#19
So I've been seeing a lot of talks about how Bitcoin has lost or is losing its identity because it is now regarded as an asset and not as a currency.

How many times are we going to keep on emphasizing that we may not have to totally agrees with what other people are saying over the internet about bitcoin, a normal person who has the knowledge of what bitcoin is and how it was been invented by it creator will not come up with the idea of it losing its identity without having anything to back things up, so far so good, bitcoin is both an investment asset and a digital currency which is decentralized and there is nothing anyone can do about these than to let it remain as it has always been.
sr. member
Activity: 756
Merit: 276
December 04, 2024, 02:29:07 PM
#18
So I've been seeing a lot of talks about how Bitcoin has lost or is losing its identity because it is now regarded as an asset and not as a currency. I used to see the discourse a lot before but recently I've been seeing it more (don't know if it's just me). I have made a couple of replies on posts related to something like this on the forum.
So I really want to understand how Bitcoin has lost its identity.
There is nothing that has stopped bitcoin from being used as a currency. Certain factors make it difficult for businesses to accept bitcoin as a means of payment but I don't think the fact that it's regarded as an asset is one of them

From what I understand, these two features are not mutually exclusive. In the sense that Bitcoin can be an asset and can also be a currency. Just as the dollar is an asset and also a current. The difference, Bitcoin is a better asset than the dollar. I was not opportune or smart enough to be among the early adopters of bitcoin, so I'm going to ask a question to people who were, was there ever a time that people bought bitcoin for the sole purpose of using it just as a currency?
Like when they bought the coin, they had no expectation or hope of bitcoin appreciating so they could make a profit? I doubt that and if they did, then Bitcoin was always an asset from the beginning and also a currency.
So at what point did bitcoin start losing its identity?
People always like to run along with the wrong narrative, right from the onset bitcoin has always been a digital currency that has the potential of appreciating in value over time, although i haven't read about any story concerning bitcoin losing its identity, because for anybody to come up with that kind of concept clearly shows that the person hasn't been involved with cryptocurrency or bitcoin anytime. Bitcoin can be stored as an asset that appreciate over time and bitcoin can as well be used as a digital currency, there are lots of outlets out there that accept payment in Bitcoin so at what point did bitcoin lose its identity?
legendary
Activity: 4424
Merit: 4794
December 04, 2024, 02:15:12 PM
#17
Bitcoin is not commonly used as a currency

bitcoin is used as currency... thats the whole point of the blockchain to log and transcribe the transfers

i think you mean its not commonly used as a domestic money/international money/niche community money/common money
jr. member
Activity: 28
Merit: 37
December 04, 2024, 02:08:22 PM
#16
Bitcoin is not commonly used as a currency because it is too slow or too expensive if you want your tx to have priority, and this will only worsen over time unless the protocol is updated through a hard fork - which is unlikely to ever happen.

Just go with the flow and treat it as an asset. It will never become a practical option for small purchases due to high fees, nor for large purchases due to a lack of privacy.

But hey, that's just my opinion - everyone has one, just like everyone has an ass and you are free to use it as you want.
legendary
Activity: 1512
Merit: 7340
Farewell, Leo
December 04, 2024, 02:01:59 PM
#15
So I really want to understand how Bitcoin has lost its identity.
Bitcoin is the epitome of individual liberty. Its identity is derived from the freedom to define it yourself. It's just that it is now increasingly regarded as an asset.

It is not often very attractive means of payment, because of volatility and on-chain cost, but depending the case, it can be far more comfortable to use than other mediums of exchange. For example, sending money electronically, from one country to the other, or if you want final settlement within 10 minutes, or privacy, or [endless list].  
legendary
Activity: 4424
Merit: 4794
December 04, 2024, 01:51:49 PM
#14
currencies can be anything
its an umbrella term for anything and everything thats used as a medium of exchange

there are commodity currencies, asset currencies, money currencies, etc
heck even in relationships, women can use sex as a currency

the issue is not that bitcoin is losing identity. its that most new users are the young whom have no economics knowledge of identifying things using economic terms correctly.

commodities are traditionally raw materials used to create other products so as for bitcoins status and utility, bitcoin 2009-2017 was a asset currency as it was its own sole product. however with protocol upgrades allowed bitcoin to be also a base unit to then generate other silly data and tokens for subnetworks so became a commodity currency aswell

bitcoin became BOTH a asset and commodity currency dependant on which market it is used
gold also sits in both categories of currencies(store of value market + raw material for manufacturing market)


legendary
Activity: 1666
Merit: 1158
December 04, 2024, 01:28:15 PM
#13
So I've been seeing a lot of talks about how Bitcoin has lost or is losing its identity because it is now regarded as an asset and not as a currency. I used to see the discourse a lot before but recently I've been seeing it more (don't know if it's just me). I have made a couple of replies on posts related to something like this on the forum.
So I really want to understand how Bitcoin has lost its identity.
If lost in your own terms is based on what your insinuating, then you it has to some extent to you and that’s to you.

Even now, it’s not out of context for a commodity to have it serve several purposes,
In the real estate, a property could serve housing purposes or being used as a store house or some place of business and in the same time, it retains value as an asset. That doesn’t limit it to certain functions based on where it’s most frequently used.

Same applies here with Bitcoin,
We must come to terms with the fact that, it’s an evolving commodity and means to finance that is still trying to attain mainstream use and its limited supply provides investors with opportunity to make the most of it while they can, hence the idea of hodling.
hero member
Activity: 574
Merit: 554
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
December 04, 2024, 01:26:34 PM
#12
So at what point did bitcoin start losing its identity?
Bitcoin will always remain an alternative to fiat and I dont think it will ever lose its identity. Many people use Bitcoin as an asset and a hedge against inflation but there are still people who use it as a currency. Some countries have some restrictions placed on banking activities. In my country, you might not be allowed to transfer more than a certain amount per day. There are some businessmen who use Bitcoin to pay their business partners. While some individuals see it as the best means to carry out international business transactions. However, due to its high volatility and unfavorable government policies, might continue to be used as an asset.     
full member
Activity: 238
Merit: 177
Wheel of Whales 🐳
December 04, 2024, 01:13:29 PM
#11
There is nothing to be disappointed about Bitcoin's ups and downs. If you dump a little, you will see many people making many comments and wondering if Bitcoin is really losing its existence, but I have one thing to say, is it so easy that it dumped a little and lost its true identity. Isn't it kind of stupid to think like that?

There will be a market volatility, we will never make such comments because Bitcoin is a permanent coin, it is kind of stupid to make different comments about it. Have faith in it and it will do you good in the long run. Wait and see with patience, then you will understand what situation it will lead to.
legendary
Activity: 1974
Merit: 1150
December 04, 2024, 12:58:22 PM
#10
For most users, I think bitcoin is still a better alternative currency. I'd never know if anyone here has adopted bitcoin as a primary currency in their daily lives, but I think it's unlikely there is. This adoption depends on local regulations, so use cases are hampered by this, especially if the government has not legalized it.

Bitcoin does not lose its identity as a currency, even if you cannot use it as currency in your country. Until now I have not been able to use bitcoin as a currency or means of payment in my country, this is because regulations in my country have not legalized bitcoin as a legal means of payment. While in many other countries, bitcoin has been used as a means of payment and I really don't agree when someone says bitcoin is losing its identity.
hero member
Activity: 784
Merit: 672
Top Crypto Casino
December 04, 2024, 12:53:55 PM
#9
So at what point did bitcoin start losing its identity?
Well, Bitcoin hasn't lost its identity at all and it will never lose it even in future. Bitcoin was always an asset and a digital currency, and it will always remain as an asset and also a digital currency.

It depends on the mindset of the ones who buy it, if they buy it for holding then it's an asset for them, but if they buy it to purchase goods with it then it works as a way of payments for them.
legendary
Activity: 3332
Merit: 1404
Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!
December 04, 2024, 12:52:58 PM
#8
I believe that largely the object's purpose is defined by its usage. Sure, maybe it wasn't the initially intended purpose, but if it works fine and finds it demand, why not? Theatre used to be mass entertainment, sort of like cinemas or even Netflix is now, but now theatre is this highly intellectual thing for people who appreciate culture. Its function changed over time, but we don't say it lost its identity.
Bitcoin can still be a currency for some people, for some purchases, and in some contexts. For many it's more of an asset, though, and it makes sense, considering how much Bitcoin is growing in value over time. So yes, the two aren't mutually exclusive.
hero member
Activity: 2450
Merit: 948
Metawin.com - Truly the best casino ever
December 04, 2024, 12:52:37 PM
#7
So I've been seeing a lot of talks about how Bitcoin has lost or is losing its identity because it is now regarded as an asset and not as a currency. I used to see the discourse a lot before but recently I've been seeing it more (don't know if it's just me). I have made a couple of replies on posts related to something like this on the forum.
So I really want to understand how Bitcoin has lost its identity.
There is nothing that has stopped bitcoin from being used as a currency. Certain factors make it difficult for businesses to accept bitcoin as a means of payment but I don't think the fact that it's regarded as an asset is one of them

From what I understand, these two features are not mutually exclusive. In the sense that Bitcoin can be an asset and can also be a currency. Just as the dollar is an asset and also a current. The difference, Bitcoin is a better asset than the dollar. I was not opportune or smart enough to be among the early adopters of bitcoin, so I'm going to ask a question to people who were, was there ever a time that people bought bitcoin for the sole purpose of using it just as a currency?
Like when they bought the coin, they had no expectation or hope of bitcoin appreciating so they could make a profit? I doubt that and if they did, then Bitcoin was always an asset from the beginning and also a currency.
So at what point did bitcoin start losing its identity?
Bitcoin was an anonymous currency, a decade ago it was almost impossible to track Bitcoin transactions but now we have found that there are flaws and blockchain analysis companies are getting better with tracking.
We had a KYC-free service years ago and now almost every bitcoin-related business asks their users to submit KYC documents.
Years ago we could mine Bitcoin at home but today it's a commercial business and only big mining companies can mine it.
Bitcoin mixers were legal and now you are a criminal if you use them.
Decentralized Exchanges are also getting banned.
What's the next step?
This is why I think that Bitcoin is losing its identity.
Pages:
Jump to: