Topic: Is Bitcoin Volatility A Bad Thing? - page 23. (Read 3781 times)
I think its both a bad thing and good thing depends on how it increase and decrease. Its a bad thing when it decrease so much and increased less but a good thing when it increased so much and decreased less. Its a matter of seeing the results in your own way i guess. Volatility is either rapidly increasing or rapidly decreasing , but what i also think is bitcoin is not volatile anymore because it does always increasing.
Steam dropped bitcoin support citing "high volatility" as a motive.
When amazon stock jumped from $18 to $1,200 over a period of years, was this high volatility a bad thing?
If bitcoin's value increases from $6,000 to $16,000 over a period of months, and HODL'ers benefit, this high volatility is bad?
Where does the idea of high volatility being an unnecessary evil come from?
Are there good arguments or evidence which support the concept of high volatility being a negative circumstance?
In a sense, volatility simply means the price of something moves a lot, its not that bad if the vast majority of motion is in an upward direction?
When amazon stock jumped from $18 to $1,200 over a period of years, was this high volatility a bad thing?
If bitcoin's value increases from $6,000 to $16,000 over a period of months, and HODL'ers benefit, this high volatility is bad?
Where does the idea of high volatility being an unnecessary evil come from?
Are there good arguments or evidence which support the concept of high volatility being a negative circumstance?
In a sense, volatility simply means the price of something moves a lot, its not that bad if the vast majority of motion is in an upward direction?
I don't really think so. If bitcoin is not as volatile as it is now, then people will not be able to earn by investment. Perhaps people could just work for them to earn bitcoin. Then that would mean that bitcoin is no different from the money that we are using right now. Therefore, bitcoin's volatility is definitely a positive thing and not just something that should be eliminated.
Volatility isn't good unless you sell the peaks and buy the dips. BTC is young and it's going to be volatile for years to come.
Yes thats true , if Bitxoin is not a volatile currency we should be all worry about it and I think it will not be famous as now it remain as cheap like before, cause Bitxoin became popular because of its price nowadays.
Steam dropped bitcoin support citing "high volatility" as a motive.
When amazon stock jumped from $18 to $1,200 over a period of years, was this high volatility a bad thing?
If bitcoin's value increases from $6,000 to $16,000 over a period of months, and HODL'ers benefit, this high volatility is bad?
Where does the idea of high volatility being an unnecessary evil come from?
Are there good arguments or evidence which support the concept of high volatility being a negative circumstance?
In a sense, volatility simply means the price of something moves a lot, its not that bad if the vast majority of motion is in an upward direction?
The volatility it has a negative impact in the evolution of Bitcoin because it is manipulable. When amazon stock jumped from $18 to $1,200 over a period of years, was this high volatility a bad thing?
If bitcoin's value increases from $6,000 to $16,000 over a period of months, and HODL'ers benefit, this high volatility is bad?
Where does the idea of high volatility being an unnecessary evil come from?
Are there good arguments or evidence which support the concept of high volatility being a negative circumstance?
In a sense, volatility simply means the price of something moves a lot, its not that bad if the vast majority of motion is in an upward direction?
Bitcoin volatility is not a bad thing actually it makes attracts more investors or traders to hold on or buy bitcoin at cheaper price in a possible time. Bitcoin volatility is a usual movement in the exchange that price always fluctuates.
Volatility is something we cannot even rule out in any currency but the rate of bitcoin's volatility has really made it even more interesting most especially for traders who have seen it as a very good way to even make more money than they can imagine from crypto.Every currency fluctuate in price but what makes bitcoin's own huge is the fact that it is new and there is so much of room for it to grow as well as a lot of FUD surrounding the investment for now.
Volatility is a huge disadvantage only on the business sector but for traders just like me, it makes my day feels so good when btc is soaring high but I know one day that btc will slow down its growth when it is so high and a little bit volatile.
Yeah, for those who are looking at investing, then that may be something pretty bad but for those who understand what the long term holds, would believe in it the more and still overlook whatever goes on presently with bitcoin.It is the understanding of bitcoin that counts and that is what will keep the market strengthened and not just some people who just want to get rich overnight. For traders who know what they are doing though, that is something that you can really count on to make the best out of it.
Steam dropped bitcoin support citing "high volatility" as a motive.
When amazon stock jumped from $18 to $1,200 over a period of years, was this high volatility a bad thing?
If bitcoin's value increases from $6,000 to $16,000 over a period of months, and HODL'ers benefit, this high volatility is bad?
Where does the idea of high volatility being an unnecessary evil come from?
Are there good arguments or evidence which support the concept of high volatility being a negative circumstance?
In a sense, volatility simply means the price of something moves a lot, its not that bad if the vast majority of motion is in an upward direction?
When amazon stock jumped from $18 to $1,200 over a period of years, was this high volatility a bad thing?
If bitcoin's value increases from $6,000 to $16,000 over a period of months, and HODL'ers benefit, this high volatility is bad?
Where does the idea of high volatility being an unnecessary evil come from?
Are there good arguments or evidence which support the concept of high volatility being a negative circumstance?
In a sense, volatility simply means the price of something moves a lot, its not that bad if the vast majority of motion is in an upward direction?
The constant rise in the price of bitcoin is good for those who own it. High volatility is a paradise for speculators but it is one of the obstacles to widespread use of bitcoins.
No! bitcoin volatility is not a bad thing instead it is positive way for the real traders of bitcoin, whether the price value goes down or up instead they are both a chance them or opportunity for them to earn big in the near future.
Steam dropped bitcoin support citing "high volatility" as a motive.
When amazon stock jumped from $18 to $1,200 over a period of years, was this high volatility a bad thing?
If bitcoin's value increases from $6,000 to $16,000 over a period of months, and HODL'ers benefit, this high volatility is bad?
Where does the idea of high volatility being an unnecessary evil come from?
Are there good arguments or evidence which support the concept of high volatility being a negative circumstance?
In a sense, volatility simply means the price of something moves a lot, its not that bad if the vast majority of motion is in an upward direction?
When amazon stock jumped from $18 to $1,200 over a period of years, was this high volatility a bad thing?
If bitcoin's value increases from $6,000 to $16,000 over a period of months, and HODL'ers benefit, this high volatility is bad?
Where does the idea of high volatility being an unnecessary evil come from?
Are there good arguments or evidence which support the concept of high volatility being a negative circumstance?
In a sense, volatility simply means the price of something moves a lot, its not that bad if the vast majority of motion is in an upward direction?
I think Bitcoin Volatility is not a bad thing but it serves as the reason why it is interesting. There are no people will invest to Bitcoin if It is not volatile. Volatility makes Bitcoin more challenging and become one step ahead compare to other currencies. In addition, it is good for short term investment.
Bitcoin volatility is not a bad thing actually it makes attracts more investors or traders to hold on or buy bitcoin at cheaper price in a possible time. Bitcoin volatility is a usual movement in the exchange that price always fluctuates.
That’s right, nobody would be interested in investing in Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies if they are not Volatile. It’s just like a game, and what makes up a game is that there are times you have to lose and times you win… without losing and winning, there would be no celebration. So without the Volatility, there would be no profit making.
I am glad that the price range is big because it is short-term trading
Volatility isn't good unless you sell the peaks and buy the dips. BTC is young and it's going to be volatile for years to come.
Yes thats true , if Bitxoin is not a volatile currency we should be all worry about it and I think it will not be famous as now it remain as cheap like before, cause Bitxoin became popular because of its price nowadays.
Volatility isn't good unless you sell the peaks and buy the dips. BTC is young and it's going to be volatile for years to come.
Well for me Volatility is bad when you dont have any holdings ,cause you are losing the chance to become more profitable while you are supposed to be probably rich if you are hold some. Still Volatility makes Bitcoin makes our profit better.
Steam dropped bitcoin support citing "high volatility" as a motive.
When amazon stock jumped from $18 to $1,200 over a period of years, was this high volatility a bad thing?
If bitcoin's value increases from $6,000 to $16,000 over a period of months, and HODL'ers benefit, this high volatility is bad?
Where does the idea of high volatility being an unnecessary evil come from?
Are there good arguments or evidence which support the concept of high volatility being a negative circumstance?
In a sense, volatility simply means the price of something moves a lot, its not that bad if the vast majority of motion is in an upward direction?
If Bitcoin's fluctuation is a bad thing, it's always bad, because Bitcoin is always changing over time. Many people think Bitcoin will rise in the future, but I think if Bitcoin is so small, it will. There are many Bitcoin sellers and investing in a different currency may have a future over Bitcoin When amazon stock jumped from $18 to $1,200 over a period of years, was this high volatility a bad thing?
If bitcoin's value increases from $6,000 to $16,000 over a period of months, and HODL'ers benefit, this high volatility is bad?
Where does the idea of high volatility being an unnecessary evil come from?
Are there good arguments or evidence which support the concept of high volatility being a negative circumstance?
In a sense, volatility simply means the price of something moves a lot, its not that bad if the vast majority of motion is in an upward direction?
Steam dropped bitcoin support citing "high volatility" as a motive.
When amazon stock jumped from $18 to $1,200 over a period of years, was this high volatility a bad thing?
If bitcoin's value increases from $6,000 to $16,000 over a period of months, and HODL'ers benefit, this high volatility is bad?
Where does the idea of high volatility being an unnecessary evil come from?
Are there good arguments or evidence which support the concept of high volatility being a negative circumstance?
In a sense, volatility simply means the price of something moves a lot, its not that bad if the vast majority of motion is in an upward direction?
. Being Volatile of Bitcoin Its not BAD anyway. Getting higher price of Bitcoin gives benefits for those who invest it when the price fall down. It is difficult only for those who invest at Its higher price and sell their Bitcoin when the selling price is Very low. Being volatile comes the good News for those who can wait when the selling price of Bitcoin is too high. That is why we must invest at the right time , in good timing, to gain more profits. When amazon stock jumped from $18 to $1,200 over a period of years, was this high volatility a bad thing?
If bitcoin's value increases from $6,000 to $16,000 over a period of months, and HODL'ers benefit, this high volatility is bad?
Where does the idea of high volatility being an unnecessary evil come from?
Are there good arguments or evidence which support the concept of high volatility being a negative circumstance?
In a sense, volatility simply means the price of something moves a lot, its not that bad if the vast majority of motion is in an upward direction?
Steam dropped bitcoin support citing "high volatility" as a motive.
When amazon stock jumped from $18 to $1,200 over a period of years, was this high volatility a bad thing?
If bitcoin's value increases from $6,000 to $16,000 over a period of months, and HODL'ers benefit, this high volatility is bad?
Where does the idea of high volatility being an unnecessary evil come from?
Are there good arguments or evidence which support the concept of high volatility being a negative circumstance?
In a sense, volatility simply means the price of something moves a lot, its not that bad if the vast majority of motion is in an upward direction?
When amazon stock jumped from $18 to $1,200 over a period of years, was this high volatility a bad thing?
If bitcoin's value increases from $6,000 to $16,000 over a period of months, and HODL'ers benefit, this high volatility is bad?
Where does the idea of high volatility being an unnecessary evil come from?
Are there good arguments or evidence which support the concept of high volatility being a negative circumstance?
In a sense, volatility simply means the price of something moves a lot, its not that bad if the vast majority of motion is in an upward direction?
I don't really think so. If bitcoin is not as volatile as it is now, then people will not be able to earn by investment. Perhaps people could just work for them to earn bitcoin. Then that would mean that bitcoin is no different from the money that we are using right now. Therefore, bitcoin's volatility is definitely a positive thing and not just something that should be eliminated.
It is not about Bitcoin volatility being eliminated because how can you really do that? But it doesn't mean that it is a good thing. Bitcoin's volatility prevents it from being adopted by merchants, as well as incredibly high fees, of course. But real adoption would make Bitcoin grow more consistently and steadily without abrupt crashes and corrections as is the situation today. This would be a genuinely good thing for Bitcoin. Volatility, on the other hand, is tremendously detrimental in the long run.
Steam dropped bitcoin support citing "high volatility" as a motive.
When amazon stock jumped from $18 to $1,200 over a period of years, was this high volatility a bad thing?
If bitcoin's value increases from $6,000 to $16,000 over a period of months, and HODL'ers benefit, this high volatility is bad?
Where does the idea of high volatility being an unnecessary evil come from?
Are there good arguments or evidence which support the concept of high volatility being a negative circumstance?
In a sense, volatility simply means the price of something moves a lot, its not that bad if the vast majority of motion is in an upward direction?
Actually Bitcoin volatility are constantly observed by many people as a negative thing because it makes dumping and lowering of their initial holdings instead of being risen just what like they have been expecting when they enter this kind of currency. But seeing it as a negative, is a positive thing for the other people because it gives them opportunity to buy more bitcoins for more chances of gaining when the price goes back into a pump so we must do it also looking Bitcoin volatility in a positive outlook. When amazon stock jumped from $18 to $1,200 over a period of years, was this high volatility a bad thing?
If bitcoin's value increases from $6,000 to $16,000 over a period of months, and HODL'ers benefit, this high volatility is bad?
Where does the idea of high volatility being an unnecessary evil come from?
Are there good arguments or evidence which support the concept of high volatility being a negative circumstance?
In a sense, volatility simply means the price of something moves a lot, its not that bad if the vast majority of motion is in an upward direction?
Steam dropped bitcoin support citing "high volatility" as a motive.
When amazon stock jumped from $18 to $1,200 over a period of years, was this high volatility a bad thing?
If bitcoin's value increases from $6,000 to $16,000 over a period of months, and HODL'ers benefit, this high volatility is bad?
Where does the idea of high volatility being an unnecessary evil come from?
Are there good arguments or evidence which support the concept of high volatility being a negative circumstance?
In a sense, volatility simply means the price of something moves a lot, its not that bad if the vast majority of motion is in an upward direction?
When amazon stock jumped from $18 to $1,200 over a period of years, was this high volatility a bad thing?
If bitcoin's value increases from $6,000 to $16,000 over a period of months, and HODL'ers benefit, this high volatility is bad?
Where does the idea of high volatility being an unnecessary evil come from?
Are there good arguments or evidence which support the concept of high volatility being a negative circumstance?
In a sense, volatility simply means the price of something moves a lot, its not that bad if the vast majority of motion is in an upward direction?
for the old players the increase can and is very profitable but for new players who already buy expensive will be very depressed because the price of bitcoin can collapse instantly.
Steam dropped bitcoin support citing "high volatility" as a motive.
When amazon stock jumped from $18 to $1,200 over a period of years, was this high volatility a bad thing?
If bitcoin's value increases from $6,000 to $16,000 over a period of months, and HODL'ers benefit, this high volatility is bad?
Where does the idea of high volatility being an unnecessary evil come from?
Are there good arguments or evidence which support the concept of high volatility being a negative circumstance?
In a sense, volatility simply means the price of something moves a lot, its not that bad if the vast majority of motion is in an upward direction?
When amazon stock jumped from $18 to $1,200 over a period of years, was this high volatility a bad thing?
If bitcoin's value increases from $6,000 to $16,000 over a period of months, and HODL'ers benefit, this high volatility is bad?
Where does the idea of high volatility being an unnecessary evil come from?
Are there good arguments or evidence which support the concept of high volatility being a negative circumstance?
In a sense, volatility simply means the price of something moves a lot, its not that bad if the vast majority of motion is in an upward direction?
I don't really think so. If bitcoin is not as volatile as it is now, then people will not be able to earn by investment. Perhaps people could just work for them to earn bitcoin. Then that would mean that bitcoin is no different from the money that we are using right now. Therefore, bitcoin's volatility is definitely a positive thing and not just something that should be eliminated.
The Bitcoin Volatility isn't a terrible thing, But what one must be advised about is the same as there can be a descending incline or fall in the esteem. In any case, one must know the variables relieving against this quick ascent and fall, and afterwards making arrangements for venture won't be a hard assignment, yet that both the negative and positives would be acknowledged in great destiny.
Jump to: